There are many posts and commentaries on these issues spread between several entries on my various blogs, which I hope to consolidate herein on a single entry.
Yes indeed, obvously. In fact I don’t hold out the slightest hope of convincing you of anything concerning the assassination of John Kennedy. You obviously have made up your mind and won’t be moved no matter what evidence might be put before you.
Being stuck in the rut of propagating the 58 year old Warren Report is as bacward looking as one can get…more than half a century has gone by. And in that time many new revelations have come forth concerning the conspiracy to kill president Kennedy. Several government commission as well as citizen researchers have revealed startling things about the assassenation and especially about the accused assassin Lee Oswald.
I watched the movie ‘Parkland’ a few days ago, a Tom Hanks production. Mr. Hanks is a promoter of Bugiosi’s absurd fabulations. In that film Marguerite Oswald was depicted as a cantankerous old nut because she insisted that her son Lee was an agent of the federal government. Now it turns out that Marguerite was correct. Lee Oswald was in fact an agent of ONI. Office of Naval Intellegence.
After leaving the NSA Newman joined the University of Maryland (http://www.umd.edu/) where he taught courses in Soviet, Chinese Communist, East Asian, and Vietnam War history, as well as Sino-Soviet and U.S.-Soviet relations.
A new edition of *Oswald and the CIA* (http://www.amazon.co.uk/Oswald-CIA-Documented-Relationship-Government/dp/1602392536/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1220872471&sr=1-1) was published in 2008. Newman argues that James Angleton (https://spartacus-educational.com/SSangleton.htm) was probably the key figure in the assassination of John F. Kennedy (https://spartacus-educational.com/USAkennedyJ.htm): "In my view, whoever Oswald's direct handler or handlers were, we must now seriously consider the possibility that Angleton was probably their general manager. No one else in the Agency had the access, the authority, and the diabolically ingenious mind to manage this sophisticated plot. No one else had the means necessary to plant the WWIII virus in Oswald's files and keep it dormant for six weeks until the president's assassination. Whoever those who were ultimately responsible for the decision to kill Kennedy were, their reach extended into the national intelligence apparatus to such a degree that they could call upon a person who knew its inner secrets and workings so well that he could design a failsafe mechanism into the fabric of the plot. The only person who could ensure that a national security cover-up of an apparent counterintelligence nightmare was the head of counterintelligence."
Newman has revealed that Lee Oswald was ONI. and was assigned to go to the Soviet Union to learn what the Soviets knew of the U2 spyplane program. Recall that Oswald searved at Atsugi US Naval Base prior to “defecting” to the USSR.
Oswald’s next assignment was to inflitrate the Bannister organization in New Orleans. It was there that Oswald found out the information that led to the raid by US agents on the LaComb training base run by David Ferry
**FBI agents raid LaCombe paramilitary camp 1 Aug 1963**
This seems to be when Angleton discovered Oswald and his infiltration of the Guy Bannister opperation for a second invasion of Cuba by the Anti-Castro Cubans.
Oswald had gone undercover as an anti-Castro supporter. we all know that whole story.
Angleton decided Oswald would be the perfect fall guy for the planned Kennedy hit. and made arrangements with the Paines to get involved with the Oswalds. Ruth Paine was the proximate source of Oswald getting the job at the Texax Book Depository Building in Dallas,
The scene was set, and the other members of the conspiracy in the miiliary and Secret Service put the plan in action for the hit to take place in the trip JFK planned for Dallas.
“Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.”~John F. Kennedy
IN ALL LIKELIHOOD there does not exist a single American community where reside 12 men or women, good and true, who presume that Lee Harvey Oswald did not assassinate President Kennedy. No more savage comment can be made in reference to the breakdown of the Anglo-Saxon system of jurisprudence. At the very foundation of our judicial operation lies a cornerstone which shelters the innocent and guilty alike against group hysteria, manufactured evidence, overzealous law enforcement officials, in short, against those factors which militate for an automated, prejudged, neatly packaged verdict of guilty. It is the sacred right of every citizen accused of committing a crime to the presumption of innocence.
[…]
That which intervenes between the zealous investigator and the jury is due process of law, developed at great cost in human life and liberty over the years. It is the right to have irrelevant testimony barred. It is the right to have facts, not hopes or thoughts or wishes or prejudicial opinions, presented. It is the right to test by cross-examination the veracity of every witness and the value of his testimony. It is, perhaps above all, the right to counsel of one’s own choice, so that all the other rights may be protected. In this defense, Oswald has forfeited all rights along with his life.~Mark Lane – December 19, 1963
Senator Ron Johnson moderated the COVID-19: A Second Opinion roundtable in Washington, D.C., to provide different perspectives on the pandemic response worldwide, the state of early treatment and hospital treatment and efficacy of COVID-19 shots
The panel included an all-star lineup with some of the most brilliant minds in their fields, nearly all of whom have experienced censorship, intimidation or professional reprisal and damage as a result of their advocacy
There are multiple compounds that have been used successfully in early COVID-19 treatment — nearly all of them repurposed or generic — but those who prescribe them risk losing their license
Dr. Mary Talley Bowden, an ENT specialist from Houston estimated that, using protocols such as ivermectin, high-dose IV steroids and vitamin C, she’s kept more than 2,000 people out of the hospital
The continued denial of natural immunity to COVID-19 is unprecedented and furthering the false notion that this is a “pandemic of the unvaccinated”
The roundtable serves as the “second opinion” that Americans need to put the pandemic response into perspective and get answers to questions from real experts who have no stake in the outcome — other than to save lives
That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness . . .
. . . when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty to throw such Government and to provide new Guards for their future security.
DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE
The Man of November 5
The election of the new Prince of the Universe should have had profound and far-reaching consequences for the future of the American people and for the life, liberty and happiness of Mankind.
But in the summer of 1968, the legitimate representatives of the Republican and Democratic Parties decided to pick their candidates for 37th President of the United States from among the merchandise on sale in the bargain basement.
In the decades and in the history books to come, 1968 will be remembered as the year the lights flickered out -- as a year of frustrations, regressions and shattered myths. These reversions to the past -- Prague, the Vatican, Chicago -- are the manifestations of political and economic forces seeking desperately to preserve situations of which they have long since lost control.
But the twilight descending upon the United States will have the gravest consequences of all, for it is America that sets the pace of the world, and often dictates its choices.
As the Sixties draw to a close, the peoples of the earth, left to themselves without gods and without leaders, are awaiting new decisions. The Man of November 5 cannot escape the confrontations before him. By refusing these choices, he will leave the problems unsolved.
Two Americans, John and Robert Kennedy, had the courage to meet these problems head on and break down the doors to the future. They were stopped by the frightened accomplices of the traditions on which they infringed.
When John Fitzgerald Kennedy's head exploded, it was for some the signal for toasts. One November morning the cannon boomed, the Panama Canal was closed, flags everywhere flew at half-mast, and it is said that even Andrei Gromyko wept. Adlai Stevenson declared that he would bear the sorrow of his death till the day of his own, and the Special Forces added a black band to their green berets.
Almost five years passed, and another bullet shattered the brain and stopped the heart of another Kennedy who had taken up the fight.
There was another funeral. Once again the Green Berets formed the Honor Guard; once again the Stars and Stripes flew at half-mast. One evening in June, Robert Kennedy joined his brother beneath the hill at Arlington, and those passing by can bring them flowers.
"Happy Days Are Here Again," they sang at the Chicago Convention. But the scores have not been settled.
Who killed them?
And why?
This book sets out to answer these questions. But beyond the facts and the outcries, behind the assassins and their motives, other culprits appear. The responsibility of American civilization is no longer in doubt.
Europe sometimes speaks of taking up the American challenge. But do the force of arms, the excesses of an economy and the abuses of a political system constitute an adequate example? Washington, Lincoln and the Kennedys gone, never in two centuries have the virtues and hopes on which the young Republic was founded been so gravely endangered as they are today.
By their meditations, by their decisions, by their rebellion, the citizens of the United States will bring about their Renaissance.
We dedicate this book to the youth of the Seventies. Only they will know how to face the crises that lie ahead. May they find in these pages the strength to defy the redoubtable old men and revive the forgotten glories.
America accepted Franklin D. Roosevelt only because she had no other alternative. She found herself again in Harry Truman, a solid citizen with no perverse ambitions who declared that "the combined thought and action of a people always lead in the right direction." (7) Eisenhower was the ideal President. A victorious commander, he dazzled the crowds. Inconsistent, he had no dangerous political philosophy. A petty bourgeois, he dared not oppose the Titans.
And suddenly Kennedy appeared, the first President born in this century, a millionaire, a liberal, and an intellectual. The Democratic candidate nevertheless made no attempt to conceal his aims.
"In the decade that lies ahead -- in the challenging revolutionary sixties -- the American Presidency will demand more than ringing manifestoes issued from the rear of the battle. It will demand that the President place himself in the very thick of the fight, that he care passionately about the fate of the people he leads, that he be willing to serve them at the risk of incurring their momentary displeasure."
"We stand today at the edge of a New Frontier -- the frontier of the 1960's -- a frontier of unknown opportunities and perils -a frontier of unfulfilled hopes and threats." (8)
"Woodrow Wilson's New Freedom promised our nation a new political and economic framework. Franklin Roosevelt's New Deal promised security and succor to those in need. But the New Frontier of which I speak is not a set of promises -- it is a set of challenges. It sums up, not what I intend to offer the American people, but what I intend to ask of them. It appeals to their price, not their pocketbook -- it holds out the promise of more sacrifice instead of more security . . ." (9)
"The Scriptures tell of a time when there were giants on the earth, and that is what our country needs today. This is not the time for futilities. This is not the time for petty complaints and half-measures. This is the time for men of action, not men of words -- this is the time for giant hearts, not faint hearts . . ." (10)
"We have no time for complacency, timidity, or doubt. This is a time for courage and action." (11)
"The old era has ended. The old ways will not do." (12)
It was all so beautiful, so unreal, that no one believed it. They even admired his inscrutability, his ingenuity in using a metaphor borrowed from American folklore, from the myth of the West, to mask a demagogy that was all the more inoffensive because it seemed credible. Others, more cunning, grew concerned when, in West Virginia, under the low roofs of a forgotten America, the Senator from Massachusetts spoke to the abandoned miners, to the unemployed, to the families vegetating in the hills. America began to ask herself if Kennedy was speaking seriously when he bent towards the little people and the forgotten.
Kennedy's socialism aimed at enriching the poor rather than impoverishing the rich, but it was dangerous nevertheless. For one hundred million Americans, the gravest danger, after bankruptcy, is that those just behind may catch up with them. The nouveaux rich are only rich so long as no one grows richer. The have-nots live in constant fear of the down-and-outs, and the hate and fear of the little Puerto Rican for New York are really no more than the hate and fear of half of New York for the little Puerto Rican.
Millions of Americans have risen from the proletariat to the middle class with insufficient intellectual means. They or their sons want to continue to climb the ladder of society. This new American bourgeoisie, which has risen by its own toil, works less today and lives better, and pays less taxes. It claims to be descended from the Pilgrim Fathers, but its origins go back to the washing machine. The Great Society is essentially sectarian and violent. Its mottoes are "each man for himself," "it's none of their business" and "woe to the vanquished."
Today's American is at the mercy of his anxieties. The United States has grown so wealthy that she has lost touch with the rest of the world. America is neither here nor there, be it a question of power or of weakness. She no longer knows what is happening on this earth. Her universe exists in the third person.
The difference continues to widen between the American radicalism of the Thirties and the radicalism of today, whose ethical basis is possession. True, this basis can be traced far back into the American past, and finds its theme song in the ballads of the Far West, where men killed for a horse or a bottle of beer. But Jeffersonian tradition placed, or restored, human values above real estate values.
Although Chomsky appears to be aware that the assassination was the result of a conspiracy, he considers it not to be a significant political event. His opinion of the JFK assassination follows from his conclusion that there was no substantial change in policy between the Kennedy and Johnson administrations:
The core issue in the current Kennedy revival is the claim that JFK intended to withdraw from Vietnam, a fact suppressed by the media; and was assassinated for that reason, it is prominently charged. Some allege further that Kennedy was intent on destroying the CIA, dismantling the military–industrial complex, ending the Cold War, and opening an era of development and freedom for Latin America, among other forms of class treachery that led to his downfall. … there is a shared belief across this spectrum that history changed course dramatically when Kennedy was assassinated in November 1963, an event that casts a grim shadow over all that followed.
(Noam Chomsky, ‘Vain Hopes, False Dreams’, Z Magazine, September 1992)
The article goes on to provide evidence to support Chomsky’s interpretation, a topic he covered fully in his book, Rethinking Camelot: JFK, The Vietnam War, and US Political Culture, South End Press, 1993.
This is the area in which Chomsky differs from his detractors among the JFK assassination community. He finds no evidence of the significant political changes which surely would have happened had the assassination been the result of a high–level conspiracy. Because the assassination was not the result of a high–level conspiracy, it is not of any real importance.
For more on this topic, see The Political Context of the JFK Assassination.
What does it mean to be well adjusted to this pathological society? To go along to get along...to avoid natural curiosity and be willfully blind to the absurdity and madness of the current world situation.
Farewell America: The Plot to Kill JFK Paperback – November 22, 2002
by James Hepburn (Author), William Turner (Author)
Originally published in 1968 in France under the title L’Amerique Brule (America Is Burning), Farewell America quickly became a best-seller in Europe in eleven languages. It was the inside story of the assassination of President John Kennedy. Although borrowing heavily from published critics of the Warren Commission Report, the book describes the roots of the Cold War, the linkage between large corporate and banking interests, the ever-growing American intelligence apparatus, and the international petroleum cartels that were lined up with a bevy of military brass and Mafia chieftains against JFK. A combination of these powerful interests called “The Committee” coordinated all aspects of the murder, from setting the time and place of the shooting to the recruitment of the gunmen and the coverup of the conspiracy afterward. The bottom line was that enemies of JFK collaborated with the CIA to erase the perceived threat to their interests by John and Robert Kennedy. Heady stuff for 1968. So incendiary, in fact, that importation of the book through Canada was squelched, allegedly at the instigation of the FBI. Farewell America wasn’t just another book about the assassination conspiracy; it bristled with restricted information about U.S. intelligence agencies, the White House, global business, and military and political affairs that had to have come from a knowlegdeable source, in this case, French intelligence. It also represented the surreptitious intrusion by those in French government circles into American politics, namely, the 1968 presidential elections.
The Sixth Floor Museum at Dealey Plaza presented an engaging program featuring renowned forensic pathologist, consultant and author Dr. Cyril H. Wecht. In this two-part presentation, Museum Curator Stephen Fagin led Dr. Wecht in conversation on his remarkable career and longtime interest in the assassination. Wecht then delivered a multimedia lecture on key areas of the Warren Commission’s 1964 investigation, including President Kennedy’s autopsy and the controversial single bullet theory.
Dr. Wecht began researching the Kennedy assassination when he was invited to speak before the 1965 meeting of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences. More than half a century later, Wecht continues to lecture and give media interviews on the assassination. As a distinguished elder statesman of the assassination research community and current chairman of the Citizens Against Political Assassinations organization, Wecht remains an outspoken critic of the Warren Commission’s conclusion that Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone.
This video contains adult language and graphic imagery which may be disturbing. Viewer discretion is advised.
This presentation took place on April 11, 2017. To see related films, photos, documents and oral histories from The Sixth Floor Museum's collection, visit our online collections database (http://emuseum.jfk.org). Or make a research appointment to explore the books, DVDs and other materials available in the Museum's Reading Room (http://www.jfk.org/the-collections/re...).
“Well we obviously disagree.”—Mr Roe
Yes indeed, obvously. In fact I don’t hold out the slightest hope of convincing you of anything concerning the assassination of John Kennedy. You obviously have made up your mind and won’t be moved no matter what evidence might be put before you.
Being stuck in the rut of propagating the 58 year old Warren Report is as bacward looking as one can get…more than half a century has gone by. And in that time many new revelations have come forth concerning the conspiracy to kill president Kennedy. Several government commission as well as citizen researchers have revealed startling things about the assassenation and especially about the accused assassin Lee Oswald.
I watched the movie ‘Parkland’ a few days ago, a Tom Hanks production. Mr. Hanks is a promoter of Bugiosi’s absurd fabulations. In that film Marguerite Oswald was depicted as a cantankerous old nut because she insisted that her son Lee was an agent of the federal government. Now it turns out that Marguerite was correct. Lee Oswald was in fact an agent of ONI. Office of Naval Intellegence.
**John M. Newman**
John M. Newman spent 20 years with the U.S. Army Intelligence (http://www.inscom.army.mil/). This included serving in in Thailand (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thailand), the Philippines (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philippines), Japan (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japan), and China (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/China). He eventually became executive assistant to the director of the National Security Agency (NSA).
After leaving the NSA Newman joined the University of Maryland (http://www.umd.edu/) where he taught courses in Soviet, Chinese Communist, East Asian, and Vietnam War history, as well as Sino-Soviet and U.S.-Soviet relations.
Newman is the author of JFK and Vietnam: (http://www.amazon.co.uk/JFK-Vietnam-Deception-Intrigue-Struggle/dp/0446516783/ref=sr_11_1/202-8909125-0335819?ie=UTF8) Deception, Intrigue, and the Struggle for Power (http://www.amazon.co.uk/JFK-Vietnam-Deception-Intrigue-Struggle/dp/0446516783/ref=sr_11_1/202-8909125-0335819?ie=UTF8) (1992) and *Oswald and the CIA* (http://www.amazon.co.uk/Oswald-CIA-John-Newman/dp/0786701315/sr=1-1/qid=1158843611/ref=sr_1_1/202-8909125-0335819?ie=UTF8&s=books) (1995). He also served as served as an adviser to Oliver Stone (https://spartacus-educational.com/JFKstoneO.htm) while he was making *JFK* (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0102138/) and was one of the experts called upon to advise the JFK Assassination Records Review Board (https://spartacus-educational.com/JFKassboard.htm)..
In 1995 Wayne Smith (https://spartacus-educational.com/JFKsmithW.htm), chief of the Centre for International Policy in Washington, arranged a meeting on the assassination of John F. Kennedy (https://spartacus-educational.com/USAkennedyJ.htm), in Nassau, Bahamas. Others in attendance were Gaeton Fonzi (https://spartacus-educational.com/JFKfonzi.htm), Dick Russell (https://spartacus-educational.com/JFKrussellR.htm), Noel Twyman (https://spartacus-educational.com/JFKtwyman.htm), Anthony Summers (https://spartacus-educational.com/JFKsummers.htm), Peter Dale Scott (https://spartacus-educational.com/JFKscottD.htm), Jeremy Gunn, John Judge, Andy Kolis, Peter Kornbluh, Mary and Ray LaFontaine, Jim Lesar, Alan Rogers, Russ Swickard, Ed Sherry, and Gordon Winslow.
Some high-level Cuban officials attended the conference. This included Fabian Escalante (https://spartacus-educational.com/JFKescalante.htm), Carlos Lechuga (https://spartacus-educational.com/JFKlechuga.htm), a former Cuban diplomat, and Arturo Rodriguez, a State Security official. Escalante revealed details of the confession made by Tony Cuesta (https://spartacus-educational.com/JFKcuesto.htm). He also informed the group they had a spy in the anti-Castro community in Miami and knew about the plot to kill Kennedy.
A new edition of *Oswald and the CIA* (http://www.amazon.co.uk/Oswald-CIA-Documented-Relationship-Government/dp/1602392536/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1220872471&sr=1-1) was published in 2008. Newman argues that James Angleton (https://spartacus-educational.com/SSangleton.htm) was probably the key figure in the assassination of John F. Kennedy (https://spartacus-educational.com/USAkennedyJ.htm): "In my view, whoever Oswald's direct handler or handlers were, we must now seriously consider the possibility that Angleton was probably their general manager. No one else in the Agency had the access, the authority, and the diabolically ingenious mind to manage this sophisticated plot. No one else had the means necessary to plant the WWIII virus in Oswald's files and keep it dormant for six weeks until the president's assassination. Whoever those who were ultimately responsible for the decision to kill Kennedy were, their reach extended into the national intelligence apparatus to such a degree that they could call upon a person who knew its inner secrets and workings so well that he could design a failsafe mechanism into the fabric of the plot. The only person who could ensure that a national security cover-up of an apparent counterintelligence nightmare was the head of counterintelligence."
Other books by John Newman include: *Where Angels Tread Lightly: The Assassination of President Kennedy: Volume 1* (https://www.amazon.co.uk/Where-Angels-Tread-Lightly-Assassination/dp/1478302410/ref=sr_1_1?dchild=1&keywords=Where+Angels+Tread+Lightly%3A+The+Assassination+of+President+Kennedy%3A+Volume+1&qid=1619889138&s=books&sr=1-1) (2015), *Countdown to Darkness: The Assassination of President Kennedy Volume II* (https://www.amazon.co.uk/Countdown-Darkness-Assassination-President-Kennedy/dp/1511503947/ref=sr_1_1?dchild=1&keywords=Countdown+to+Darkness%3A+The+Assassination+of+President+Kennedy+Volume+II%3A+Volume+2&qid=1619889189&s=books&sr=1-1) (2017) and *Into the Storm: The Assassination of President Kennedy Volume III* (https://www.amazon.co.uk/Into-Storm-Assassination-President-Kennedy/dp/172264897X/ref=sr_1_1?dchild=1&keywords=Into+the+Storm%3A+The+Assassination+of+President+Kennedy+Volume+III&qid=1619889271&s=books&sr=1-1) (2019).
Newman has revealed that Lee Oswald was ONI. and was assigned to go to the Soviet Union to learn what the Soviets knew of the U2 spyplane program. Recall that Oswald searved at Atsugi US Naval Base prior to “defecting” to the USSR.
Oswald’s next assignment was to inflitrate the Bannister organization in New Orleans. It was there that Oswald found out the information that led to the raid by US agents on the LaComb training base run by David Ferry
**FBI agents raid LaCombe paramilitary camp 1 Aug 1963**
FBI agents raid LaCombe paramilitary camp 1 Aug 1963 - Newspapers.com (https://www.newspapers.com/clip/21781810/fbi-agents-raid-lacombe-paramilitary/)
This seems to be when Angleton discovered Oswald and his infiltration of the Guy Bannister opperation for a second invasion of Cuba by the Anti-Castro Cubans.
Oswald had gone undercover as an anti-Castro supporter. we all know that whole story.
Angleton decided Oswald would be the perfect fall guy for the planned Kennedy hit. and made arrangements with the Paines to get involved with the Oswalds. Ruth Paine was the proximate source of Oswald getting the job at the Texax Book Depository Building in Dallas,
The scene was set, and the other members of the conspiracy in the miiliary and Secret Service put the plan in action for the hit to take place in the trip JFK planned for Dallas.
\\][//
“Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.”~John F. Kennedy
IN ALL LIKELIHOOD there does not exist a single American community where reside 12 men or women, good and true, who presume that Lee Harvey Oswald did not assassinate President Kennedy. No more savage comment can be made in reference to the breakdown of the Anglo-Saxon system of jurisprudence. At the very foundation of our judicial operation lies a cornerstone which shelters the innocent and guilty alike against group hysteria, manufactured evidence, overzealous law enforcement officials, in short, against those factors which militate for an automated, prejudged, neatly packaged verdict of guilty. It is the sacred right of every citizen accused of committing a crime to the presumption of innocence.
[…]
That which intervenes between the zealous investigator and the jury is due process of law, developed at great cost in human life and liberty over the years. It is the right to have irrelevant testimony barred. It is the right to have facts, not hopes or thoughts or wishes or prejudicial opinions, presented. It is the right to test by cross-examination the veracity of every witness and the value of his testimony. It is, perhaps above all, the right to counsel of one’s own choice, so that all the other rights may be protected. In this defense, Oswald has forfeited all rights along with his life.~Mark Lane – December 19, 1963
https://hybridrogue1.wordpress.com/2015/03/28/the-warren-commission-cult/
\\][//
COVID-19 Round Table in DC With Sen. Ron Johnson
Analysis by Dr. Joseph Mercola
4hrs 55min
Senator Ron Johnson moderated the COVID-19: A Second Opinion roundtable in Washington, D.C., to provide different perspectives on the pandemic response worldwide, the state of early treatment and hospital treatment and efficacy of COVID-19 shots
The panel included an all-star lineup with some of the most brilliant minds in their fields, nearly all of whom have experienced censorship, intimidation or professional reprisal and damage as a result of their advocacy
There are multiple compounds that have been used successfully in early COVID-19 treatment — nearly all of them repurposed or generic — but those who prescribe them risk losing their license
Dr. Mary Talley Bowden, an ENT specialist from Houston estimated that, using protocols such as ivermectin, high-dose IV steroids and vitamin C, she’s kept more than 2,000 people out of the hospital
The continued denial of natural immunity to COVID-19 is unprecedented and furthering the false notion that this is a “pandemic of the unvaccinated”
The roundtable serves as the “second opinion” that Americans need to put the pandemic response into perspective and get answers to questions from real experts who have no stake in the outcome — other than to save lives
https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2022/02/12/covid-19-round-table-in-dc.aspx
\\][//
Farewell America
by James Hepburn
for Walter,
the first born of a New America
That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness . . .
. . . when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty to throw such Government and to provide new Guards for their future security.
DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE
The Man of November 5
The election of the new Prince of the Universe should have had profound and far-reaching consequences for the future of the American people and for the life, liberty and happiness of Mankind.
But in the summer of 1968, the legitimate representatives of the Republican and Democratic Parties decided to pick their candidates for 37th President of the United States from among the merchandise on sale in the bargain basement.
In the decades and in the history books to come, 1968 will be remembered as the year the lights flickered out -- as a year of frustrations, regressions and shattered myths. These reversions to the past -- Prague, the Vatican, Chicago -- are the manifestations of political and economic forces seeking desperately to preserve situations of which they have long since lost control.
But the twilight descending upon the United States will have the gravest consequences of all, for it is America that sets the pace of the world, and often dictates its choices.
As the Sixties draw to a close, the peoples of the earth, left to themselves without gods and without leaders, are awaiting new decisions. The Man of November 5 cannot escape the confrontations before him. By refusing these choices, he will leave the problems unsolved.
Two Americans, John and Robert Kennedy, had the courage to meet these problems head on and break down the doors to the future. They were stopped by the frightened accomplices of the traditions on which they infringed.
When John Fitzgerald Kennedy's head exploded, it was for some the signal for toasts. One November morning the cannon boomed, the Panama Canal was closed, flags everywhere flew at half-mast, and it is said that even Andrei Gromyko wept. Adlai Stevenson declared that he would bear the sorrow of his death till the day of his own, and the Special Forces added a black band to their green berets.
Almost five years passed, and another bullet shattered the brain and stopped the heart of another Kennedy who had taken up the fight.
There was another funeral. Once again the Green Berets formed the Honor Guard; once again the Stars and Stripes flew at half-mast. One evening in June, Robert Kennedy joined his brother beneath the hill at Arlington, and those passing by can bring them flowers.
"Happy Days Are Here Again," they sang at the Chicago Convention. But the scores have not been settled.
Who killed them?
And why?
This book sets out to answer these questions. But beyond the facts and the outcries, behind the assassins and their motives, other culprits appear. The responsibility of American civilization is no longer in doubt.
Europe sometimes speaks of taking up the American challenge. But do the force of arms, the excesses of an economy and the abuses of a political system constitute an adequate example? Washington, Lincoln and the Kennedys gone, never in two centuries have the virtues and hopes on which the young Republic was founded been so gravely endangered as they are today.
By their meditations, by their decisions, by their rebellion, the citizens of the United States will bring about their Renaissance.
We dedicate this book to the youth of the Seventies. Only they will know how to face the crises that lie ahead. May they find in these pages the strength to defy the redoubtable old men and revive the forgotten glories.
https://www.jfk-online.com/farewell00.html
\\][//
America accepted Franklin D. Roosevelt only because she had no other alternative. She found herself again in Harry Truman, a solid citizen with no perverse ambitions who declared that "the combined thought and action of a people always lead in the right direction." (7) Eisenhower was the ideal President. A victorious commander, he dazzled the crowds. Inconsistent, he had no dangerous political philosophy. A petty bourgeois, he dared not oppose the Titans.
And suddenly Kennedy appeared, the first President born in this century, a millionaire, a liberal, and an intellectual. The Democratic candidate nevertheless made no attempt to conceal his aims.
"In the decade that lies ahead -- in the challenging revolutionary sixties -- the American Presidency will demand more than ringing manifestoes issued from the rear of the battle. It will demand that the President place himself in the very thick of the fight, that he care passionately about the fate of the people he leads, that he be willing to serve them at the risk of incurring their momentary displeasure."
"We stand today at the edge of a New Frontier -- the frontier of the 1960's -- a frontier of unknown opportunities and perils -a frontier of unfulfilled hopes and threats." (8)
"Woodrow Wilson's New Freedom promised our nation a new political and economic framework. Franklin Roosevelt's New Deal promised security and succor to those in need. But the New Frontier of which I speak is not a set of promises -- it is a set of challenges. It sums up, not what I intend to offer the American people, but what I intend to ask of them. It appeals to their price, not their pocketbook -- it holds out the promise of more sacrifice instead of more security . . ." (9)
"The Scriptures tell of a time when there were giants on the earth, and that is what our country needs today. This is not the time for futilities. This is not the time for petty complaints and half-measures. This is the time for men of action, not men of words -- this is the time for giant hearts, not faint hearts . . ." (10)
"We have no time for complacency, timidity, or doubt. This is a time for courage and action." (11)
"The old era has ended. The old ways will not do." (12)
It was all so beautiful, so unreal, that no one believed it. They even admired his inscrutability, his ingenuity in using a metaphor borrowed from American folklore, from the myth of the West, to mask a demagogy that was all the more inoffensive because it seemed credible. Others, more cunning, grew concerned when, in West Virginia, under the low roofs of a forgotten America, the Senator from Massachusetts spoke to the abandoned miners, to the unemployed, to the families vegetating in the hills. America began to ask herself if Kennedy was speaking seriously when he bent towards the little people and the forgotten.
Kennedy's socialism aimed at enriching the poor rather than impoverishing the rich, but it was dangerous nevertheless. For one hundred million Americans, the gravest danger, after bankruptcy, is that those just behind may catch up with them. The nouveaux rich are only rich so long as no one grows richer. The have-nots live in constant fear of the down-and-outs, and the hate and fear of the little Puerto Rican for New York are really no more than the hate and fear of half of New York for the little Puerto Rican.
Millions of Americans have risen from the proletariat to the middle class with insufficient intellectual means. They or their sons want to continue to climb the ladder of society. This new American bourgeoisie, which has risen by its own toil, works less today and lives better, and pays less taxes. It claims to be descended from the Pilgrim Fathers, but its origins go back to the washing machine. The Great Society is essentially sectarian and violent. Its mottoes are "each man for himself," "it's none of their business" and "woe to the vanquished."
Today's American is at the mercy of his anxieties. The United States has grown so wealthy that she has lost touch with the rest of the world. America is neither here nor there, be it a question of power or of weakness. She no longer knows what is happening on this earth. Her universe exists in the third person.
The difference continues to widen between the American radicalism of the Thirties and the radicalism of today, whose ethical basis is possession. True, this basis can be traced far back into the American past, and finds its theme song in the ballads of the Far West, where men killed for a horse or a bottle of beer. But Jeffersonian tradition placed, or restored, human values above real estate values.
https://www.jfk-online.com/farewell02.html
\\][//
Although Chomsky appears to be aware that the assassination was the result of a conspiracy, he considers it not to be a significant political event. His opinion of the JFK assassination follows from his conclusion that there was no substantial change in policy between the Kennedy and Johnson administrations:
The core issue in the current Kennedy revival is the claim that JFK intended to withdraw from Vietnam, a fact suppressed by the media; and was assassinated for that reason, it is prominently charged. Some allege further that Kennedy was intent on destroying the CIA, dismantling the military–industrial complex, ending the Cold War, and opening an era of development and freedom for Latin America, among other forms of class treachery that led to his downfall. … there is a shared belief across this spectrum that history changed course dramatically when Kennedy was assassinated in November 1963, an event that casts a grim shadow over all that followed.
(Noam Chomsky, ‘Vain Hopes, False Dreams’, Z Magazine, September 1992)
The article goes on to provide evidence to support Chomsky’s interpretation, a topic he covered fully in his book, Rethinking Camelot: JFK, The Vietnam War, and US Political Culture, South End Press, 1993.
This is the area in which Chomsky differs from his detractors among the JFK assassination community. He finds no evidence of the significant political changes which surely would have happened had the assassination been the result of a high–level conspiracy. Because the assassination was not the result of a high–level conspiracy, it is not of any real importance.
For more on this topic, see The Political Context of the JFK Assassination.
http://22november1963.org.uk/noam-chomsky-jfk-assassination
\\][//
Henry A. Wallace
The Century of the Common Man
delivered 8 May 1942, Grand Ballroom, Commodore Hotel, New York, NY
https://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/henrywallacefreeworldassoc.htm
\\][//
What does it mean to be well adjusted to this pathological society? To go along to get along...to avoid natural curiosity and be willfully blind to the absurdity and madness of the current world situation.
Why don't you care?
\\][//
Farewell America: The Plot to Kill JFK Paperback – November 22, 2002
by James Hepburn (Author), William Turner (Author)
Originally published in 1968 in France under the title L’Amerique Brule (America Is Burning), Farewell America quickly became a best-seller in Europe in eleven languages. It was the inside story of the assassination of President John Kennedy. Although borrowing heavily from published critics of the Warren Commission Report, the book describes the roots of the Cold War, the linkage between large corporate and banking interests, the ever-growing American intelligence apparatus, and the international petroleum cartels that were lined up with a bevy of military brass and Mafia chieftains against JFK. A combination of these powerful interests called “The Committee” coordinated all aspects of the murder, from setting the time and place of the shooting to the recruitment of the gunmen and the coverup of the conspiracy afterward. The bottom line was that enemies of JFK collaborated with the CIA to erase the perceived threat to their interests by John and Robert Kennedy. Heady stuff for 1968. So incendiary, in fact, that importation of the book through Canada was squelched, allegedly at the instigation of the FBI. Farewell America wasn’t just another book about the assassination conspiracy; it bristled with restricted information about U.S. intelligence agencies, the White House, global business, and military and political affairs that had to have come from a knowlegdeable source, in this case, French intelligence. It also represented the surreptitious intrusion by those in French government circles into American politics, namely, the 1968 presidential elections.
\\][//
https://youtu.be/G6ZuVa4bmoU?t=8 -- Permindex deep state plot to kill JFK
The Roots of the Great Reset Agenda
https://www.australiannationalreview.com/state-of-affairs/the-roots-of-the-great-reset-agenda/
\\][//
https://youtu.be/mqr8cfATwyo?t=64 -- A Case for Conspiracy with Dr. Cyril H. Wecht
The Sixth Floor Museum at Dealey Plaza presented an engaging program featuring renowned forensic pathologist, consultant and author Dr. Cyril H. Wecht. In this two-part presentation, Museum Curator Stephen Fagin led Dr. Wecht in conversation on his remarkable career and longtime interest in the assassination. Wecht then delivered a multimedia lecture on key areas of the Warren Commission’s 1964 investigation, including President Kennedy’s autopsy and the controversial single bullet theory.
Dr. Wecht began researching the Kennedy assassination when he was invited to speak before the 1965 meeting of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences. More than half a century later, Wecht continues to lecture and give media interviews on the assassination. As a distinguished elder statesman of the assassination research community and current chairman of the Citizens Against Political Assassinations organization, Wecht remains an outspoken critic of the Warren Commission’s conclusion that Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone.
This video contains adult language and graphic imagery which may be disturbing. Viewer discretion is advised.
This presentation took place on April 11, 2017. To see related films, photos, documents and oral histories from The Sixth Floor Museum's collection, visit our online collections database (http://emuseum.jfk.org). Or make a research appointment to explore the books, DVDs and other materials available in the Museum's Reading Room (http://www.jfk.org/the-collections/re...).
\\][//
Jim Garrison Interview with the HSCA, August 3, 1977 -- https://youtu.be/tA0-m2bwf6E?t=39
\\][//
Thoughts on secret service accidental M15 shot from the back?
Red, I find the theory quite unlikely for any of the wounds to Kennedy or Connolly.
The throat shot to JFK was from the front. The JFK head shot was from the front. The shallow wound at T-3 (back wound) had to have been a ricochet.
Three teams of snipers rear side and front.
See: Enemy of the Truth, Myths, Forensics, and the Kennedy Assassination Paperback –
Sherry Fiester
https://hybridrogue1.wordpress.com/2015/03/05/sherry-fiester-on-enemy-of-the-truth/
\\][//