This is Davos' role in 'saving' the world

Davos, Swizerland is the home of the infamous World Economic Forum and its agenda known as the Great Reset.

Before the discussion on what the role Davos has on saving the world it is necessarry to define the term ‘save’ and put it in context. So let us learn by example and look at another situation where the term ‘save’ was used as a descriptor for another important topic. That of the 2020 presidential election, in an article by Mollie Ball in the February 4 2021 issue of TIME Magazine titled; The Secret History of the Shadow Campaign That Saved the 2020 Election.

And now one more discussion on ‘Principles’ ‘Ideals’ the distinctions between the two, and the nature of ‘Truth’ as an ethical standard in the considerations of the study of ‘Sociopolitics’.

An ideal is value that an entity actively pursues as a goal and holds above other concerns perceived as being less meaningful. A principle is a fundamental truth or proposition that serves as the foundation for a system of belief or behavior or for a chain of reasoning. As we can see, there is a distincion between the two terms, there is the principle, and then there is the value of it compared to other evaluations.

Assessment of a particular set of sociopolitical principles extant in the western world as the establishment of the American Republic from the Declaration of Independence in 1776 until 1789 when the present day Constitution went into effect.

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.” — The Declaration of Independence. July 4, 1776

For the United States the principles so eloquently set forth in the Declaration are the ideal and fundamental principles of unalienable rights to Liberty in the United States of America. To establish these ideal principles in constructing the government there were several stages and experements attempted by the founding generation of Americans.

First there was the trial by fire, the War For Independence against Great Britain, 1775-83, also known as the American Revolution.

After considerable debate and alteration, the Articles of Confederation were adopted by the Continental Congress on November 15, 1777. This document served as the United States’ first constitution, and was in force from March 1, 1781, until 1789 when the present day Constitution went into effect. Th same year as the US Constitution was ratified the Northwest Ordinance was authored and established.

The Northwest Ordinance, officially titled “An Ordinance for the Government of the Territory of the United States North West of the River Ohio,” was adopted by the Confederation Congress on July 13, 1787. Also known as the Ordinance of 1787, the Northwest Ordinance established a government for the Northwest Territory, outlined the process for admitting a new state to the Union, and guaranteed that newly created states would be equal to the original thirteen states. Considered one of the most important legislative acts of the Confederation Congress, the Northwest Ordinance also protected civil liberties and outlawed slavery in the new territories.

Now let us attempt to assess the 2020 presidential election, and the article by Mollie Ball; The Secret History of the Shadow Campaign That Saved the 2020 Election.

Ball’s article attempts to describe the rigging of the 2020 in terms of “saving” the election. While the language used by Ms. Ball is necessarily quite Orwellian in its attempt to convince that ths election was “saved” by the manipulations and unlawful means used to accomplish rendering the election to a conclusion steeped in influencing the judicial system with millions of dollars in what might rightly be termed ‘bribes’, although not entirely financial, but often by concincing of the propriety of the cause at hand. It should be recalle that not only the direct conspirators but a huge portion of the administrative state was against President Trump for reasons of existential survival. Trump had declared war on the administrative state, which he lovingly referred to as “the Swamp”

One issue that is at present still in limbo for the administrative state is the status of Hunter Biden’s laptop scandal. It was known to be authentic by any just and fair assessment of the facts of the case, and yet the FBI sat on it, and many so-called ‘Intelligence officials” claimed falsly that the material in the laptop was “Russian disinformation”. Very recently these issues have come to light steming from and interview with Zuckerberg by Joe Rogan wherein Zuckerberg revealed that the FBI contacted Facebook to inform them of “Russian disinformation” that was about to be “dumped” in the press.

At any rate the Laptop scandal is part and parcel of the agenda to manipulate the outcome of the 2020 presidential election, that is to this very day denied by the corporate regime media.

This brings us to the point where we can apply the lessons learned from the 2020 presidential election and apply them to the assertion that ‘Davos’ has a role in “saving” the world. As an alagory to the rigged 2020 election it can be better explained how utterly disingenuous the assertion are that the Great Reset is anything but the newest attempt by the financial elite to establish a global regime meant to be run in a neofeudal fasion by the Technocratic elite represented in Davos as the World Economic Forum headed by Klaus Schwab.

Klaus Schwab is the epetome of the storybook villain, a caricature of the evil madman in a James Bond film with his thick Empirical German accent and arrogant persona. And yet he is real and is truly evil like a long episode of the Twilight Zone come to life.

Born in Ravensburg in 1938, Klaus Schwab is a child of Adolf Hitler’s Germany, a police-state regime built on fear and violence, on brainwashing and control, on propaganda and lies, on industrialism and eugenics, on dehumanisation and “disinfection”, on a chilling and grandiose vision of a “new order” that would last a thousand years.

Schwab seems to have dedicated his life to reinventing that nightmare and to trying to turn it into a reality not just for Germany but for the whole world.

Worse still, as his own words confirm time and time again, his technocratic fascist vision is also a twisted transhumanist one, which will merge humans with machines in “curious mixes of digital-and-analog life”, which will infect our bodies with “Smart Dust” and in which the police will apparently be able to read our brains.

And, as we will see, he and his accomplices are using the Covid-19 crisis to bypass democratic accountability, to override opposition, to accelerate their agenda and to impose it on the rest of humankind against our will in what he terms a “Great Reset“.

Schwab is not, of course, a Nazi in the classic sense, being neither a nationalist nor an anti-semite, as testified by the $1 million Dan David Prize he was awarded by Israel in 2004 [although strangely by October 2021 all reference to Schwab appeared to have been removed from the Dan David Prize website!].

But 21st century fascism has found different political forms through which to continue its core project of reshaping humanity to suit capitalism through blatantly authoritarian means.

This new fascism is today being advanced in the guise of global governance, biosecurity, the “New Normal”, the “New Deal for Nature” and the “Fourth Industrial Revolution”.

Schwab was continuing this approach, when in 1971 he founded the European Management Forum, which held annual meetings at Davos in Switzerland. Here he promoted his ideology of “stakeholder” capitalism in which businesses were brought into closer co-operation with government.

“Stakeholder capitalism” is described by Forbes business magazine as “the notion that a firm focuses on meeting the needs of all its stakeholders: customers, employees, partners, the community, and society as a whole”.

Even in the context of a particular business, it is invariably an empty label. As the Forbes article notes, it actually only means that “firms can go on privately shoveling money to their shareholders and executives, while maintaining a public front of exquisite social sensitivity and exemplary altruism”.

But in a general social context, the stakeholder concept is even more nefarious, discarding any idea of democracy, rule by the people, in favour of rule by corporate interests.

Society is no longer regarded as a living community but as a business, whose profitability is the sole valid aim of human activity.

Schwab set out this agenda back in 1971, in his book Moderne Unternehmensführung im Maschinenbau (Modern Enterprise Management in Mechanical Engineering), where his use of the term “stakeholders” (die Interessenten) effectively redefined human beings not as citizens, free individuals or members of communities, but as secondary participants in a massive commercial enterprise.

The aim of each and every person’s life was “to achieve long-term growth and prosperity” for this enterprise – in other words, to protect and increase the wealth of the capitalist elite.

Now were this not enough to alert the candid mind that this project would be disasterous to the founding principles of America there is the fact that the Biden regime is in fact actively pursuing the Great Reset agenda in the United States. This was revealed by John Kerry in 2011.

John Kerry reveals Biden’s devotion to radical ‘Great Reset’ movement

In June 2011, elites at important international institutions such as the World Economic Forum and the United Nations launched a far-reaching campaign to “reset” the global economy.

The plan involves dramatically increasing the power of government through expansive new social programs like the Green New Deal and using vast regulatory schemes and government programs to coerce corporations into supporting left-wing causes.

The two justifications for the proposal, which has been aptly named by its supporters the “Great Reset,” are the COVID-19 pandemic (the short-term justification) and the so-called “climate crisis” caused by global warming (the long-term justification).

According to the Great Reset’s supporters, the plan would fundamentally transform much of society. As World Economic Forum (WEF) head Klaus Schwab wrote back in June, “the world must act jointly and swiftly to revamp all aspects of our societies and economies, from education to social contracts and working conditions. Every country, from the United States to China, must participate, and every industry, from oil and gas to tech, must be transformed. In short, we need a ‘Great Reset’ of capitalism.”

Internationally, the Great Reset has already been backed by influential leaders, activists, academics and institutions. In addition to the World Economic Forum and United Nations, the Great Reset movement counts among its the International Monetary Fund, heads of state, Greenpeace and CEOs and presidents of large corporations and financial institutions such as Microsoft and MasterCard.

But in America, most policymakers – including President-elect Joe Biden – have been relatively quiet about the Great Reset, leaving many to speculate what a Biden administration would do to support or oppose this radical plan.

There has been some evidence suggesting that Biden and some of his biggest allies back the Great Reset and would attempt to impose it on the United States. But Biden and his team have never explicitly stated that America would be involved — that is, until now.

At a panel discussion about the Great Reset hosted by the World Economic Forum in mid-November, former Secretary of State John Kerry – Biden’s would-be special presidential envoy for climate – firmly declared that the Biden administration will support the Great Reset and that the Great Reset “will happen with greater speed and with greater intensity than a lot of people might imagine.”

When asked by panel host Borge Brende whether the World Economic Forum and other Great Reset supporters are “expecting too much too soon from the new president, or is he going to deliver first day on this [sic] topics?,” Kerry responded, “The answer to your question is, no, you’re not expecting too much.”

“And yes, it [the Great Reset] will happen,” Kerry continued. “And I think it will happen with greater speed and with greater intensity than a lot of people might imagine. In effect, the citizens of the United States have just done a Great Reset. We’ve done a Great Reset. And it was a record level of voting.”

Kerry later argued that the Great Reset is necessary to slow the “climate crisis” and that “I know Joe Biden believes … it’s not enough just to rejoin Paris [the Paris Climate Accords] for the United States. It’s not enough for us to just do the minimum of what Paris requires.”

Kerry also said that because of the Great Reset movement, he believes “we’re at the dawn of an extremely exciting time” and that “the greatest opportunity we have” to address social and economic problems is “dealing with the climate crisis.”

These and the other comments made by Kerry at the WEF event are made more important by the fact that Kerry’s role in a Biden administration would involve working with the very same international institutions that have already expressed their support for the Great Reset on climate change.

This isn’t the first time Kerry has thrown his weight behind the Great Reset. At a June World Economic Forum virtual event, Kerry said the coronavirus pandemic was “a big moment” that opened the door for the Great Reset and that, “The World Economic Forum – the CEO capacity of the Forum – is really going to have to play a front and center role in refining the Great Reset to deal with climate change and inequity — all of which is being laid bare as a consequence of COVID-19.”

The evidence is now crystal clear about Biden’s connection to the Great Reset. He, John Kerry and the rest of the Biden administration are planning to bring the Great Reset to the United States. And if they are successful, the country will never be the same.

Sources:

https://thehill.com/opinion/energy-environment/528482-john-kerry-reveals-bidens-devotion-to-radical-great-reset-movement/