THE ORIGINS OF AMERICA’S SECRET POLICE
THE ORIGINS OF AMERICA’S SECRET POLICE: ANCIENT ROOTS OF OCCULT SOCIETIES & INTELLIGENCE OPERATIONS
Do leading members of secret societies managing many of the levers of influence throughout history wield genuine “knowledge known only to the inner elites”… or is something else at play?
In this Canadian Patriot Review documentary produced by Jason Dahl, narrated by Matt Ehret and based on the work of Cynthia Chung, you will be introduced to the ancient origins of the occult societies that penetrated the heart of America’s intelligence agencies after the murder of William McKinley in 1901.
This journey will take you into the heart of ancient occult societies that managed wars, financial and cultural policies over two millennia ago. You will learn of the underlying methodology of manipulation used to induce foolish kings and generals into self destruction during the days of the Persian Empire are used to this very day.
With this perspective in mind, you will be introduced to 1) the British roots of the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry founded in 1801 by British grand strategists in South Carolina, 2) a figure named Albert Pike who led in the largest expansion of this foreign agency within the USA after Lincoln’s victory in 1865 and 3) the “seat of government” which 33rd degree FBI director J. Edgar Hoover managed in the USA during the course of eight presidencies.
This dark history is contrasted to the courageous efforts of men who devoted their lives resisting the growth of this occult agency including President Franklin Roosevelt, Senator Thomas J Walsh, Congressman Hale Boggs, Attorney General of New Orleans Jim Garrison, Martin Luther King Jr, Bobby Kennedy and his brother John F Kennedy.
https://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/the-origins-of-americas-secret-police-ancient-roots-of-occult-societies-intelligence-operations/
Hoover’s FBI and Anglo-American Dictatorship
by Anton Chaitkin
In this article, Anton Chaitkin explores the historical emergence of the FBI, and what some have called the modern surveillance state. As Chaitkin demonstrates, this was not some sophisticated plot springing from the head of the monster, J. Edgar Hoover. Rather, its methods and controls were the creation of the British, who, in their preparations for World War I, recruited much of Wall Street directly into the British intelligence services, and went on to establish colonial methods of counterinsurgency as the hegemonic mode of population-control in the United States and elsewhere.
This devolution went through several phases, as the historically direct connection of the United States population to the Constitution, science, and culture was radically transformed. It relied on Wall Street and City of London control over the terrible U.S. Presidents after McKinley’s assassination, but it was interrupted by Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s recruitment of the population to return to American methods, while condemning and limiting speculative finance. The threatened return of another Roosevelt in the form of the Kennedy Administration, was averted by a wave of assassinations in the 1960s. This is not some “objective history.” When the mafia publicly controlled Las Vegas, in the 1950s and 60s, every gambler was treated as a “mark.” After all, why were they in Vegas anyway? What did their very presence say about their morality and sense of principle?
Each mark was carefully experimented upon, utilizing various forms of debauchery, sex of every kind and variety, alcohol, and criminal schemes,—all punctuated by the mesmerizing bell which went off every time someone “won” on the slot machines, the same “ding, ding, ding, ding,” which opens the New York Stock Exchange every day. As soon as the marks had been stripped of all of their money and their dignity, they were provided a “free” ride home. Broken men and women hanging out in the town was, of course, bad for business.
Director Elia Kazan, who famously ratted out almost all his friends in Hollywood as “Communist sympathizers” in the Hoover-engineered 1950s Red Scare, argued that he had no good choices,—there was only the bad, degenerate choice of cooperating with the Inquisition. In so doing, he merely underlined his cowardice and perfidy. There is a choice, as Einstein showed, as other great leaders who have beaten the British police-state methods have consistently shown. Get smart, be a scientist, explore the weaknesses of this machine, which only works because of popular stupidity and cowardice,—and exploit those weaknesses to create a new republic, just as Alexander Hamilton did.—The Editors
Part I: The Beginnings
The Wall Street/London coup which gave birth to J.Edgar Hoover and the modern Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) completed its first phase in 1901 with the assassination of President William McKinley. The murder of President McKinley would then lead to two disastrous future U.S. Presidencies—those of Theodore (“Teddy”) Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson. Each of these men was raised revering his family’s leadership role in the Southern Confederacy, and each was passionately attached to the British aristocracy that had sponsored Southern secession. Both men would be essential to shaping the FBI and the career of J. Edgar Hoover.
Shortly after assuming the Presidency, and with his man William Taft already in Manila, Roosevelt set about transforming the Philippines into America’s first colonial venture. Taft’s sponsors envisioned Philippine plantations with coolie labor, and Anglo-American imperial adventures on the Asian mainland. With Teddy in the White House, a regime of cruelty and despotism was imposed to crush Filipino resistance as Britain’s colonial police did in India and Ireland, and as Emperor Napoleon’s secret police had done.
In his history of this tyranny, historian Alfred McCoy told of “five separate secret services with spies and agents in a ceaseless surveillance of Filipino leaders and their private lives, media monitoring, psychological profiling, disinformation, penetration, manipulation, assassination. Armed resistance was met with mass slaughter [by] artillery and repeating rifles” If they “had something on you,” anything humiliating, it could be used to destroy you or turn you into their spy.
This Philippines experiment had a technical manager, a U.S. Army officer named Ralph Van Deman. He systematized surveillance and dirt-collection on every person publicly active in any way in the country. Van Deman’s secret service methods enabled efficient government by fear, blackmail, and the disappearance of the troublesome.
President Teddy Roosevelt also connived with Britain to bully Latin America for financiers’ debts. He defied Congressional direction to negotiate with Colombia for a canal route through Colombia’s province of Panama: a covert Wall Street team ran a fake revolution stealing Panama from Colombia. Oregon’s Senator John H. Mitchell attacked the Panama adventure as a House of Morgan swindle. The President went after Senator Mitchell with a special prosecutor, private detectives, and the Treasury Department’s Secret Service. The Senator and scores of his political allies were indicted for “land frauds,” with the system of spies, perjury, and blackmail being tried out in the Philippines. Mitchell was convicted, defamed in the press, and died before he could appeal. Teddy Roosevelt now moved to create a permanent national secret police.
He made Charles Bonaparte his Attorney General in1906: Charles was Emperor Napoleon Bonaparte’s great nephew, an Anglophile High Society prince, an admirer of lynching and police shootings. Bonaparte told Congress that the Department of Justice must be given “a force of permanent police under its control.” The idea was to put the Treasury Department’s Secret Service (mandated only to guard the currency and protect the President) into use for general domestic espionage.
Amidst great fear, Congress resisted. Kentucky Democrat Joseph S. Sherley said, “an instrument so dangerous should never be given to an executive unless safeguarded in every way against abuse as a spy system.” America’s Constitution is not “a system of spying on men and prying into what would ordinarily be designated as their private affairs, to determine whether or not a crime has been committed” Teddy replied that interference by Congress “will benefit only one class of people—and that is the criminal class there is no more foolish outcry than this against ‘spies’; only criminals need fear our detectives.” The Congress voted May 27, 1908 to prohibit the use of the Treasury Department’s Secret Service men as police by the Justice or any other department. Roosevelt sneered that it was “of benefit only to the criminal classes .. . . The chief argument in favor of the provision was that the Congressmen did not themselves wish to be investigated by Secret Service men.”
Iowa Republican Walter Smith responded, hitting both Bonaparte’s family record and British imperial crimes: “In a free country, no general system of spying upon and espionage of the people, such as has prevailed in Russia, in France under the empire, and at one time in Ireland, should be allowed to grow up” Straining under the Congressional restriction, Bonaparte, on Teddy Roosevelt’s instructions, created a small investigative agency within the Department of Justice. It was soon thereafter called the Bureau of Investigation (in 1935, the name would be changed to the Federal Bureau of Investigation). But this instrument was insufficient for its intended purpose, and the climate did not then exist for its effective use to suppress opposition to the Anglo-American dictatorship.
--FBI PDF
If you guys know of a good book on skullduggery I'd like to read it. I've heard that spies and secret societies go all the way back to Egypt or beyond. I'd be interested in knowing what part of human nature fuels that.
Until you read MORALS AND DOGMA by Andrew Pike, you should not criticize that great man.