There’s a fog upon LA and my friends have lost their way..”~George Harrison
So, what incentive could the military industrial complex possibly have for transforming the image of the peaceful, flower children, war protesting ‘hippies’ into raging psychokillers hopped-up on acid?
The question answers itself doesn’t it?
Were the ‘Tate-La Bianca Murders’ actually a PSYOP?
The proposition is certainly not “out of the question”; too impracticable or unlikely to merit discussion, impossible, impracticable, unfeasible, unworkable, inconceivable, unimaginable…
10050 Cielo Drive is the street address of a former mansion in Benedict Canyon, a part of Beverly Crest, north of Beverly Hills, Los Angeles, California, where the Charles Manson “family” committed the Tate murders in 1969.
Some facts about the Sharon Tate murders that have not been widely publicized.
Sharon’s father was high level military intelligence. At the time Bobby Kennedy announced that he was going to run for the presidency, the CIA’s favorite director and Zionist operative, John Frankenheimer, (The Manchurian Candidate, Seconds, Seven Days in May, The Gypsy Moths, French Connection 2, Black Sunday, the Holocroft Covenant, Year of the Gun, Ronin etc.) called Bobby and asked to follow him and film him throughout his election campaign. Frankenheimer went everywhere and filmed everything Bobby did during the campaign. The night prior to the California primary, Bobby Kennedy, Frankenheimer, Sharon Tate and others stayed at the Tate residence, and had dinner and a party there. The following evening, Bobby was driven to the Ambassador hotel along with Tate and Frankenheimer who had kept tabs of Bobby’s every movement during the campaign.
It appears that the Sharon Tate murders were more than an effort to start a race war. Manson was a CIA and Mafia asset, doing hits and black bag jobs for the Boys while running his family using MK-Ultra mind control techniques to manage his “family”. On an early nineties Hard Copy TV program, Manson admitted he killed La Bianco, who was a bookie, because he was holding out money to his superior, Frankie Carbo, the mob boss who was in Federal prison in Illinois at the time and who controlled organized boxing up to Sonny Liston’s time. The interviewer sat there with glazed look while Manson went on how dumb and uninformed the average American is. He denied any connection to the Sharon Tate murder.
There is a strong probability that Sharon Tate was targeted because of her knowledge of the Bobby Kennedy murder and perhaps she was talking to other people about the RFK murder. LAPD did everything they could to stifle the Tate murder investigation but finally had to pick up members of Manson’s “family” who may or may not have been the only killers. The rabbit hole goes deeper than you know.
My understanding is the first time The Beatles stayed at the 10050 Cielo Drive was the night they met Elvis Presley.
Read more: The Manson murders | The King Is Naked! The True Story Of The Beatles
Pipe Dreams on the Road to Serfdom
https://hybridrogue1.wordpress.com/2015/12/14/pipe-dreams-on-the-road-to-serfdom/
Dr Thomas Noguchi: LA coroner confidential
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/film/6126892/Dr-Thomas-Noguchi-LA-coroner-confidential.html
The Tate Murders – The Psyop That Stifled a Generation
Wednesday, March 25, 2015 5:14
by Miles W. Mathis
Operation CHAOS
Special Operations Group- “‘Operation CHAOS”
Responding to Presidential requests to determine the extent of foreign influence on domestic dissidence, the CI,i, upon the instruction of the Director of Central Intelligence, established within the Counterintelligence Staff a Special Operations Group in August 1967, to collect, coordinate, evaluate and report on foreign contacts with American dissidents. The Group’s activities, which later came to be known as Operation CH,4OS, led the CL4 to collect information on dissident Americans from its overseas stations and from the FBI. L41thougll the stated purpose of the Operation was to determine whether there were any foreign contacts with American dissident groups, it resulted in the accumulation of considerable material on dome,stic dissidents and their activities. During six years, the Operation compiled some 13,000 tlifferent’ files, including files on 7,200 American citizens. The clocumcnts in these files ancl related materials included the names of more than 300,000 persons and organizations, which were entered into a computerized index.
This information was kept closely guarded within the CIA to prevent. its use by anyone other than the personnel of the Special Operations Group. Utilizing this information, personnel of the Group prepared 3,500 memoranda for internal use: 3.000 , memoranda for dissemination to the FBI; and 37 memoranda for distribution to high officials. The Operation ultimately had a staff of 52, who were isolated from any substantial review even by the Counterintelligence Staff of which they were technically a part. Beginning in late 1969, Operation CHAOS used a number of agents to collect. intelligence abroad on any foreign connections with American dissident groups. In order to hare sufficient “cover” for these a.gents, the Operation recruited persons from domestic dissident groups or recruited others and instructed them to associate with such groups in this country. Most of these recruits were not directecl to collect information domestically on American dissidents. On a number of occasions, however? sucl~ information was reported by the recruits while they were developing dissident credentials in the I’nited States, and the information was retained in the files of the Operation. On three occasions, agents of the Operation were specifically used to collect domestic intelligence. Part of the reason for these transgressions was inherent in the nat.ure of the task assigned to the Group: to determine the extent of any foreign influence on domestic dissident activities. That task necessarily partook of both domestic and foreign aspects. The question could not be answered adequately without gathering information on the identities and relationships of the American citizens involved in the activities.
Accordingly, any effort by the CIA in this area was bound, from the outset,..to raise problems as to whether the Agency was looking into internal security matters and therefore exceeding its legislative aut,liority. The Presidential demands upon the CIA appear to have caused the ,1gcncy to forego, to some extent. the caution with which it might otherwise hare approached the subject. Two Presidents and their staffs made continuing and insistent requests of the CL\ for detailed evaluation of possible foreign involremerit in the domestic dissident scene. The ,1gency’s repeatetl conclusion in its reports-that it could find no significant foreign connection with domestic disorder-led to further White House demands that the CIA account for any paps in the -1genc;v’s investigation and t’hat, it renictly any lack of resources for gathering information. The cumulative effect of these repeated demands was the addition of more and more resources, including agrnts, to Operation CHAOSas the Agency attempted to support and to confirm the validity of its conclusion. These White House demands also seem to have encouraged top CL4 management to stretch and, on some occasions, to exceed the legislative restrictions. The excessive secrecy surrounding Operation CHAOS, its isolation within the CIA, and its removal from the normal chain of command prevented any effective supervision and review of its acti ities by officers not directly involved in the project.
A. Origins of Operation CHAOS
August 1967 In the wake of racial violence and civil disturbances, President Johnson on ,July 2, 1967, formed the National Commission on Civil Disorders (the Kernel. Commission) and directed it to investigate and make recommendations with respect to the origins of the disorders. ht the same time: the President instructed all other departments and agencies of government to assist the Kerner Commission by supplying information to it. On August 15, 1967, Thomas Karamessines, Deputy Director for Plans, issued a directive to the Chief of the Counterintelligence Staff inst.rncting him to establish an operation for overseas coverage of sub\-crsi\e student activities and related matters. This memorandum relayed instructions from Director Richard Helms, who, according to Helms’ testimony, acted in response to continuing. substantial pressure from the President to determine the cstent of any foreign connections with domestic dissident events. Helms’ testimony is corroborated by a contenlpornneous FBI memorandum which states : The White House recently informed Richard Helms, Director, CIA, that the Bgency should exert every possible effort to collect information concerning U.S. racial agitators who might travel abroad * * * because of the pressure placed upon Helms, a new desk has been created at the Agency for the explicit purpose of collecting information coming into the Agency and having any significant bearing on possible racial disturbances in the U.S. The question of foreign involvement in domestic dissidence combined matters over which the FBI had jurisdiction (domestic disorder) and matters which xere the concern of the CL4 (possible foreign connection). The FBI. unlike. the CIA, generally did not protlncc finished, evaluated intelligence. Apparently for these reasons, the Prrsiclcnt looked to the Director of Central Intelligence to produce a coordinated evaluation of intelligence bearing upon the question of dissidence. When the Kerner Commission’s Executive Director wrote to Helms 011 Aiupust 29. 1967. requestin, (r CTA information on civil disorders Helms offered to supply only information on foreign connections with domestic disorder. Ultimntely. the CIA furnished 26 reports to the Kerner Commission, some of which related largely to domestic dissident activities.
B. Evolution of Operation CHAOS-The November 1967 Study
The officer selected to head what became the Special Operations Group was a person already involved in a counterintelligence effort in connection with an article in Ramparts magazine on CL4 associations with -Amcrican youth orcrseas. In connection with his research and analysis, the officer had organized the beginnings of a computer system for storage and retrieval of information on persons involved in the “New Left.” By October l1967, this officer had begun to establish his operation concerning foreign connections with the domestic dissident scene. In a memoramlum for the record on October 31, 196’7, he indicated that the CT,4 was to prepare a study on the “International Connections of the United States Peace Movement.” The CT.4 immidliately set about collecting all the available government information on dissident groups. ,411 field stations of the CL4 clandistine service were polled for any information they had on the subject of the stutly. Every branch of the intelligence community was called upon to submit whatever information it had on the peace movement to the Special Operations Group for cataloging and storage. Most of the information was supplied by the FRI. ,411 information collected by the Special Operations Group was forwarded to the CIA Office of Current Intelligence, which completed the study by mid-September. Director Helms personally delivered the study to President. ,Johnson on Novembcr 15. 1067, with a covering note stating that ‘?his is the study on the United States Peace Movement you requested.” Thr study showed that there was little evidence of foreign involvement and no evidcnce of any significant foreign financial support of the peace activists within the United States. ,is a result of the information gathered for the study didn’t deliver the Special Operations Group gained an exstensive amounts of data for its later operations. On November 20. 1967, a new study was launched by the CIA at the request of thr Director of Central Intelligence. This study was titled “Demonstration Techniques.” The scope of the study was worldwide. and it concentrated on antiwar demonstrations in the United States and abroad. Thr procedure used on the earlier study was also imployed to gather information for this new project. Thr CIA sent an updated version of the Peace Movement Study to the President on Deccmbet 22, 1967, and on ,January 5, 1968, Director Helms sent to the White House a paper entitled “Student Dissent and Its Techniques in the Unitet States.” Helms cover letter to the president described the ,January 5 study as “part of our continuing exminntion of this general matter”, again the information bank of the Special Operations Group was increased by the intelligence gathered for these studies.
CHAOS in Full-Scale Operation-Mid-1969
By mid-1969, Operation CHhOS took on the organizational form which would continue for ‘the following three years. Its staff had increased to 86. Eventually it. totaled 52.) In June 1969, a Deputy Chief was assigned to the Operation to assist in administrative matters and to assume some of the responsibilities of handling the tightly-held communications. There was a further delegation of responsibility with the appointment of three branch chiefs in the operation. The increase in size and activity of the Operation was accompanied by further isolation and protective measures. The group had already been physically located in a vaulted basement area, and tighter security measures were adopted in connection with communications of the Operation. These measures were extreme, even by normally strict CIA standards. An exclusive channel for communication with the FBI was also established which severely restricted dissemination both to and from the. Bureau of CHAOS-related mat.ters. On September 6, 1969, Director Helms distributed an internal memorandum to the head of each of the directorates within CIA, instructing that support was to be given to the activities of Operation CHAOS. Both the distribution of the memorandum and the nature of the directives contained in it were most unusual. They served to underscore the importance of its substance. Helms confirmed in the September 6 memorandum that the CHAOS group had the principal operat,ional responsibilities for conducting the Agency’s activities in the “radical milieu.” Helms expected that each division of the Agency would cooperate “both in exploiting existing sources and in developing new ones, and that [the Special Operations Group] will have the necessary access to such sources and operat.ional assets.” Helms further stated in the memorandum that he believed the CIA had “the, proper approach in discharging this sensitive responsibility while strictly observing the statutory and de facto preseption on agenc.y domestic. involvements.” The September 6 memorandum, prepared after discussions with the Chief of the Operation. among others, served at. least three important functions: First, it confirmed, beyond question, the importance which Operation CHAOS had attained in terms of Agency objectives. Second, it replied to dissent. which had been voiced within the CIA concerning the Operat.ion. Third, it assured that CHAOS would recriw whatover support it needed. including personnel.
https://www.aarclibrary.org/publib/church/rockcomm/pdf/RockComm_Chap11_CHAOS.pdf
As an American who lived through those times I unfortunately don't find any of these further revelations surprising at all. Living through the 1960's was in way too many ways a preparation for what we deal with today. The long slow descent of America ( and the world) into Hell. Thanks for the essay!