Discussion about this post

User's avatar
William Whitten -- Autodidact,'s avatar

Some of the hidden zippers in these jackets: "If I call you a “conspiracy theorist,” it matters little whether you have actually claimed that a conspiracy exists or whether you have simply raised an issue that I would rather avoid. As part of the machinery of interaction, the label does conversational work (Goffman 1967) no matter how true, false, or conspiracy-related your

utterance is. Using the phrase, I can symbolically exclude you from the imagined community of reasonable interlocutors (Hall 1970:21). Specifically, when I call you a “conspiracy theorist,” I can turn the tables on you: instead of responding to a question, concern, or challenge, I twist the machinery of interaction so that you, not I, are

now called to account. In fact, I have done even more. By labeling you, I strategically exclude you from the sphere where public speech, debate, and conflict occur."

Ginna Husting - Boise State University

Martin Orr - Boise State University

Dangerous Machinery Conspiracy Theorist pdf

\\][//

Expand full comment
William Whitten -- Autodidact,'s avatar

In a culture of fear, we should expect the rise of new mechanisms of social control to deflect distrust, anxiety, and threat. Relying on the analysis of popular and academic texts, we examine one such mechanism, the label conspiracy theory, and explore how it works in public discourse to “go meta” by sidestepping the examination of evidence. Our findings suggest that authors use the conspiracy theorist label as (1) a routinized strategy of exclusion; (2) a reframing mechanism that deflects questions or concerns about power, corruption, and motive; and (3) an attack upon the personhood and competence of the questioner. This label becomes dangerous machinery at the transpersonal levels of media and academic discourse, symbolically stripping the claimant of the status of reasonable interlocutor—often to avoid the need to account for one’s own action or speech. We argue that this and similar mechanisms simultaneously control the flow of information and symbolically demobilize certain voices and issues in public discourse.

Dangerous Machinery: “Conspiracy Theorist” as a Transpersonal Strategy of Exclusion

Ginna Husting

Boise State University

Martin Orr

Boise State University

\\][//

Expand full comment
6 more comments...

No posts