Ivermectin & Hydroxychloroquine v mRNA gene therapy
Ivermectin & Hydroxychloroquine v mRNA gene therapy
William Whiten ©2022
Ivermectin has been hailed as a “wonder drug” and, according to the UNESCO World Science Report, a critical component of “one of the most triumphant public health campaigns ever waged in the developing world.”
However, since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and affiliated health authorities have vociferously recommended against ivermectin as a potential treatment for the virus.
Though the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved ivermectin for human use in treating conditions caused by parasites, it has also insisted that ivermectin “has not been shown to be safe or effective” when it comes to treating COVID-19.
In a social media message that has gone viral, the FDA labeled it as a drug for horses and not fit for human consumption: “You are not a horse. You are not a cow. Seriously, y’all. Stop it.”
Coronavirus Vaccine Problems News Articles – Excerpts of key news articles on coronavirus vaccine problems – Do your research:
Coronavirus Vaccine Problems News Articles
https://www.wanttoknow.info/coronavirus-vaccine-problemsnewsarticles
The fact is that mRNA gene therapies are NOT “vaccines”, they are dangerous pharmaceutical products containing the killer spike protein.
COVID Shots Are Dangerous Gene Therapies
Big Pharma exec: COVID shots are 'gene therapy'
Many skeptics have contended that the mRNA-based Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 shots are not "vaccines" but rather a form of gene therapy that poses untold risks by altering a recipient's DNA.
The federal government and health-care experts have denied that claim. But the president of Bayer's Pharmaceuticals Division is on record describing the mRNA shots as "cell and gene therapy" and acknowledging public wariness of the technology.
Bayer executive Stefan Oelrich, LifeSiteNews reported, made the statement at the World Health Summit, which took place in Berlin Oct. 24-26, drawing 6,000 people from 120 countries.
Oelrich said his company is "really taking that leap" to drive innovation "in cell and gene therapies."
"Ultimately, the mRNA vaccines are an example for that cell and gene therapy," he said.
"I always like to say: If we had surveyed two years ago in the public – 'would you be willing to take a gene or cell therapy and inject it into your body?' – we probably would have had a 95% refusal rate," Oelrich said.
In August, Reuters ran a "fact check" citing experts who contend that the technology in the Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna shots are not gene therapy.
Both shots use a piece of genetic code from SARS-CoV-2 to prompt an immune response in recipients. But Dr. Adam Taylor, a virologist and researcher at Griffith University in Australia, insisted that while it's "a genetic-based therapy," it doesn't alter a person's genes.
“Gene therapy, in the classical sense, involves making deliberate changes to a patient’s DNA in order to treat or cure them," he said. "mRNA vaccines will not enter a cell’s nucleus that houses your DNA genome. There is zero risk of these vaccines integrating into our own genome or altering our genetic makeup."
At the Berlin summit, the Bayer executive said that his company's "successes" over the 18 months of the pandemic "should embolden us to fully focus much more closely on access, innovation and collaboration to unleash health for all, especially as we enter, on top of everything else that is happening, a new era of science – a lot of people talk about the Bio Revolution in this context."
LifeSiteNews noted that, according to the McKinsey Global Institute, the "Bio Revolution" is "a confluence of advances in biological science and accelerating development of computing, automation, and artificial intelligence [that] is fueling a new wave of innovation."
"This Bio Revolution could have significant impact on economies and our lives, from health and agriculture to consumer goods, and energy and materials."
Oelrich said Bayer also is working at reducing the populations of Third World countries, investing $400 million in "long-acting contraceptives" and partnering with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation on "family planning initiatives."
EDITOR'S NOTE: Last year, America's doctors, nurses and paramedics were celebrated as frontline heroes battling a fearsome new pandemic. Today, under Joe Biden, tens of thousands of these same heroes are denounced as rebels, conspiracy theorists, extremists and potential terrorists. Along with massive numbers of police, firemen, Border Patrol agents, Navy SEALs, pilots, air-traffic controllers, and countless other truly essential Americans, they're all considered so dangerous as to merit termination, their professional and personal lives turned upside down due to their decision not to be injected with the experimental COVID vaccines. Biden’s tyrannical mandate threatens to cripple American society – from law enforcement to airlines to commercial supply chains to hospitals. It's already happening. But the good news is that huge numbers of "yesterday’s heroes" are now fighting back – bravely and boldly. The whole epic showdown is laid out as never before in the sensational October issue of WND's monthly Whistleblower magazine, titled "THE GREAT AMERICAN REBELLION: 'We will not comply!' COVID-19 power grab ignites bold new era of national defiance."
https://cqrcengage.com/causeaction/app/document/36532017
COVID Shots Are Dangerous Gene Therapies
Big Pharma exec: COVID shots are 'gene therapy'
Many doctors have reported success in curing the symptoms of Covid using Ivermectin & Hydroxychloroquine.
Hydroxychloroquine is effective, and consistently so when provided early, for COVID-19: a systematic review
C. Prodromos1,∗ and T. Rumschlag2
Abstract
Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) has shown efficacy against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in some but not all studies. We hypothesized that a systematic review would show HCQ to be effective against COVID-19, more effective when provided earlier, not associated with worsening disease and safe. We searched PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, Google Scholar and Google for all reports on HCQ as a treatment for COVID-19 patients. This included preprints and preliminary reports on larger COVID-19 studies. We examined the studies for efficacy, time of administration and safety. HCQ was found to be consistently effective against COVID-19 when provided early in the outpatient setting. It was also found to be overall effective in inpatient studies. No unbiased study found worse outcomes with HCQ use. No mortality or serious safety adverse events were found. HCQ is consistently effective against COVID-19 when provided early in the outpatient setting, it is overall effective against COVID-19, it has not produced worsening of disease and it is safe.
Keywords: Azithromycin, COVID-19, hydroxychloroquine, outpatient, SARS-CoV-2
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7534595/
Use of Ivermectin Is Associated With Lower Mortality in Hospitalized Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019
The Ivermectin in COVID Nineteen Study
• Juliana Cepelowicz Rajter, MD
• Michael S. Sherman, MD, FCCP
• Naaz Fatteh, MD
• Fabio Vogel, PharmD, BCPS
• Jamie Sacks, PharmD
• Jean-Jacques Rajter, MD
Background
Ivermectin was shown to inhibit severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 replication in vitro, which has led to off-label use, but clinical efficacy has not been described previously.
Research Question
Does ivermectin benefit hospitalized coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients?
Study Design and Methods
Charts of consecutive patients hospitalized at four Broward Health hospitals in Florida with confirmed COVID-19 between March 15 and May 11, 2020, treated with or without ivermectin were reviewed. Hospital ivermectin dosing guidelines were provided, but treatment decisions were at the treating physician’s discretion. The primary outcome was all-cause in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included mortality in patients with severe pulmonary involvement, extubation rates for mechanically ventilated patients, and length of stay. Severe pulmonary involvement was defined as need for Fio2 ≥ 50%, noninvasive ventilation, or invasive ventilation at study entry. Logistic regression and propensity score matching were used to adjust for confounders.
Results
Two hundred eighty patients, 173 treated with ivermectin and 107 without ivermectin, were reviewed. Most patients in both groups also received hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin, or both. Univariate analysis showed lower mortality in the ivermectin group (15.0% vs 25.2%; OR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.29-0.96; P = .03). Mortality also was lower among ivermectin-treated patients with severe pulmonary involvement (38.8% vs 80.7%; OR, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.05-0.47; P = .001). No significant differences were found in extubation rates (36.1% vs 15.4%; OR, 3.11; 95% CI, 0.88-11.00; P = .07) or length of stay. After multivariate adjustment for confounders and mortality risks, the mortality difference remained significant (OR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.09-0.80; P = .03). One hundred ninety-six patients were included in the propensity-matched cohort. Mortality was significantly lower in the ivermectin group (13.3% vs 24.5%; OR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.22-0.99; P < .05), an 11.2% (95% CI, 0.38%-22.1%) absolute risk reduction, with a number needed to treat of 8.9 (95% CI, 4.5-263).
Interpretation
Ivermectin treatment was associated with lower mortality during treatment of COVID-19, especially in patients with severe pulmonary involvement. Randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these findings.
Now the system has been permanently rigged as the whole mail-in ballot scheme has been retained even though the so-called ‘pandemic’ has passed. There are a lot of issues about that ‘pandemic’ that need to be revealed as well. The phony Wuhan lab leak tale, the fact that mRNA gene therapies are NOT vaccines, but a deadly bioweapon. The fact that Tony Fauci and Peter Daszak president of EcoHealth Alliance conspired in the “Gain of Function” experiments at Chapel Hill Bioweapon Lab along with Virologists Timothy Sheahan and Ralph Baric.
See: