DASZAK: MALTHUSIAN CRYPTO-ECO-FASCIST WHO INTENTIONALLY ORCHESTRATED SARS-2 PANDEMIC
This former Congressional Researcher contracted Covid-19 in March 2000. The medics had to beat on my chest to bring me back to life. I was in Lenox-Hill Hospital for a month with a lung tube. The disease left one of my fingers paralized making it hard to type correctly. I did research which boils down to this: Peter Cottonton Daszak deliberately and intentionally caused a pandemic by finacing all the players, convincing them they work working on a vaccine for the next SARS outbreak then ignoring warning signs of a leak that would be apparent to anyone with his credentials; such as ignoring the fact the experiments and bat virus storage were in a BSL-2 lab with as much safety as a dentists office. It's all here, all referenced with live links to sources, but thanks to the Democratic Party, and the corporate media that keeps them in power, it will be ignored. Even if you believe there was no hidden agenda and if it was just a case gross negligence Daszak still should be tried. This is a draft of a bi-partisan committee to investigate the cause of the pandemic.
OR WORLD CLASS CONMAN?
DASZAK JUNE 2020: “I gave a talk at a government meeting, and the OSTP, the Office of Science and Technology Policy, Director was there from the White House, Franca Jones,” Daszak begins while outlining his efforts to identify and sequence all viruses with pandemic potential. “I kind of faked it a little bit. I said, look, I’ve got a piece of paper here with a number,” he continues before appearing to backtrack: “I did actually… we just calculated the day before.” So I had this piece of paper, and I kind of pulled it out and it says ‘it will only cost 7 billion dollars,’ and I saw her write down the number. I thought wow, this isn’t so crazy,” he added. Commander Franca Jones – who is listed on the White House visitor logs reviewed by The National Pulse – was the director of medical programs for the Department of Defense’s chemical and biological defense program. Under Jones’s tenure, the Defense Department shipped live anthrax spores to labs in several U.S. states and military bases.
CHAPTER 1
EVIDENCE DASZAK ORCHESTRATED THE PANDEMIC
Peter Cottonton Daszak (pronounced “Daysh-ak,”) is a war criminal like his Nazi father, Bohdan, who was a member of the Youth Section of the Ukrainian Nazi party. As one would expect Bohdan volunteered to be an executioner at the Janowska German Nazi death camp combining elements of labor, transit, and extermination camps. It was established in September 1941 on the outskirts of Lwów in Eastern Poland / Western Ukraine. Inmates: Jews Liberated by: The Red Army Operated by: SS. Bohdan was captured by the British and sent to the UK where he was released into the UK population because if was deported to the Ukraine he would be hung, as well he should have been. Bohdan married Ruth Alice Mary Walton. Ian Walton and David Walton of Dukinfield Sons of Ian Walton, also of Dukinfield. AF Police for one, if not both - I think Ian was a dog handler. Grandfather was John Walton. Grandmother Ruth Alice Mary Walton (both of of Dewsnap lane) Aunt was Ruth Daszak Wikitree Bohdan died on February 1996 in Tameside, Greater Manchester, England, where he had worked in Hill's Biscuit Factory. Ruth, a Brit, gave birth to Peter in 1966? There is no DOB listed in his Wiki profile. England & Wales, Civil Registration Marriage Index, 1916-2005 Peter Daszak Spouse Janet D Cottingham (Married Feb 1997) Daszak is a Ukranian Brit expat with a Phd in Zoology specializing in parasites that attack reptiles. Daszak is not a microbiologist. Nor an M.D. What was he doing financing and personally conducting of experiments with bat viruses at the Wuhan Institute of Virology with Fauci's funding? Daszak is slick con man and wormed his way in to Fauci and USG A.I.D. circles despite lack of real credentials. He is Malthusian Eco-Fascist spook determined decrease human population in favor of Flora and Fauna.
Daszak hides his past: His brother John, told a biographer that his father, Bohdan was a Nazi death camp guard in the Ukraine however Daszak claims Bohdan was inscripted into the Nazi Army. Daszak was raised by a mass murderer, a hardcore Nazi and was indoctrinated by Bohdan in Nazi ideology. This gave him a basis to justify mass murder. Daszak is a crypto-Nazi. MORE ON BOHDAN
Daszak is an agent-of-influence for the Nazi-like Chinese Communist Party, that rounds-up Muslims and puts them in concentration camps and forced work camps and re-education camps. Note: Although aligned with the Democratic party, and pretending to be a liberal Democrat, he never mentions CCP human rights abuses.
Daszak visited and worked at the scene of the crime before Covid was first reported. Wuhan China was where the pandemic first started, only CCP stooges deny it.
Daszak financed the collection of viruses found in bat blood, feces and urine, some of which might be deadly to humans, if they "spilled-over" from nature directly to humans or through an intermediate species. He stored them in BSL-2 lab at the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) that has the same bio-security as a dentist's office. Daszak and Shi Zeng-Li's collection numbers more than 20,000 batsamples. But Shi explained that on average only 10% contain coronaviruses, and only 10% of those are closely related to SARS-CoV-1: in all its years, the team has identifi ed approximately 220 suchviruses.
The process of culturing viruses involves providing them with cells they can infect. Several labs around the world have tried to get live bat coronaviruses and failed. Until < href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-20458-9" target="_blank"> January 2021, the Wuhan lab was the only one that had managed the feat, according to Stephen Goldstein, a coronavirus expert at the University of Utah in Salt Lake City. Yang Xinglou, a senior research scientist onShi’s team worked on this.
Daszak intentionally orchestrated the pandemic by financing and initiating dangerous gain-of-function, gain-of-threat experiments with corona bat viruses at the WIV by repurposing NIH grants to WIV. See for yourself where you taxpayer money went Obama banned these proceedures in the USA. Daszak outsourced NIH grants from Fauci and his Deputy, Erik Stemmy to Shi Zeng Li, his anally fixated micro-biologist asset, who believes "The pandemic is nature's punishment for an unsanitary lifestyle." This faceless, mentally ill, robot was Head of Security at the WIV. Why was Daszak so determined to continue these Gain-of Threat experiment? Because he knew they would leak and cause a pandemic.
The experiments he financed were aimed at enhancing Corona virus spike proteins, some found in horseshoe bats that caused the first SARS mini-pandemic, to more easily invade the ACE2 cells in the human lung. "We sequenced the spine protein, the protein that attaches to cells, and then you create pseudo particles, insert proteins from the viruses that combined to human cells. Each step of this you move closer and closer to could the virus becomes pathogenic in people! You narrow down the field. You end up with a small number of viruses that really do look like killers."
Daszak knew a virus would having a good chance of leaking from the BSL-2 WIV lab built in 1956 and never reported it. How did he know other than his conducting experiments there himself? The US State Department had visited the BSL-4 lab built by the French (for experiments with viruses that had no vaccine or cure) and reported major defects in security - so you can imagine what the BSL-2 lab was like.
He introduced Shi Zeng Li to Ralph Baric, a cowboy microbiologist known as "Mr. Gain-of-Function," who developed a method to disguise the fact a virus had been genetically altered, among other things. Baric also developed a method to bring viruses of the past, such as polio, back, through reverse genetic engineering. So a virus could never be wiped off the planet as long as its nucleic code existed. Baric once gave a lecture on how to profit from a pandemic. Baric screwed-up and caused a minor pandemic in the area of the University of North Carolina.
On New Years Day 2019 Daszak was one of the first people in the USA to know of the existence of COVID-19 from his asset at the WIV, Shi Zeng Li. He was first on the scene of the crime.
DASZAZ covered-up his own crime when Daszak led the WHO investigation and cover-up in China that suggested the virus came from Barcelona via frozen meat. Daszak was not allowed on the second WHO panel because of a "conflict-of-interest" due to his WIV connection. “It can take years or even decades to find the cause of a new infectious disease. Sometimes we just never know.”
Daszak tried to cover up the lab leak theory by orchestrating a letter from various micro-biologists, many of whom were on Fauci's grant pad, that did not contain his name. The claimed the virus spilled over from nature. Daszak also became a fact-checker at Facebook, which permanently banned this researcher from advertising.
Daszak had a good cover story to disguise his hidden agenda. Dr. Daszak ran the semi-governmental PREDICT program which was supposed to predict pandemics and got milions of dollars from numerous USG agencies, even from the Department of Fish and Wildlife. He convinced Baric and Li that they were conducting gain-of-threat experiments to see which bat virus was next to spillover from nature so they could develop a vaccine for it before it became a pandemic. In the venacular, he "chumped them off."
Daszak planned to genetically enhance airborne coronaviruses and release aerosols containing nano particles with “novel chimeric spike proteins” among cave bats in Yunnan, China. He was going to do the same with MERS viruses which are 30% more deadly than SARS-19. DARPA refused to fund these experiments because of the danger of creating a pandemic.
Daszak co-authored a paper with A. J. Wakefield, an anti-vaxxer whose medical license was revoked. Convincing people not to get vaccinated is a Malthusian work-around to cut down human population by exposing them to disease. See A. J. Wakefield for more.
Fauci lied under oath and covered up for Daszak when he denied NIH never funded Gain-of-Threat research: Daszak authored a paper stating "This summary contains the information for the 2014 and 2017 NIH and NIAID grants to the Ecohealth Alliance that funded the WIV research on bat conronaviruses. As the grant description shows, this research included gain-of-function / gain-of-threat research to make coronaviruses viruses more pathogenic using techniques including genetic engineering, cell culture, and animal experimentation."
Daszak labeled anyone who attributed the pandemic to a lab leak as a "conspiracy theorist." There is no conspiracy here. Daszak played these microbiologists like a violin.
Daszak violated the law regarding grant subrecipients that required him to "Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward." Daszak allowed gain-of-function, gain-of-threat experiments that were illegal in the US when he repurposed his Fauci / Stemmy grants
Daszak: June 6, 2014 "We will use Spike Protein1 sequence data, infectious clone technology,2 in vitro and in vivo3 infection experiments and analysis of receptor binding to test the hypothesis that % divergence thresholds in Spike Protein sequences predict spillover potential. We will combine these data with bat host distribution, viral diversity and phylogeny, human survey of risk behaviors and illness, and serology to identify SARSr-CoV spillover risk hotspots across southern China." Do the words "spike protein" ring any bells?
The former vice-President of ECO-Health Andrew Huff is bonkers or pretending to be: "For the past 2 months I have been under constant surveillance in all forms, my house has been broken into, hard drives have been stolen, electronic eavesdropping equipment has been installed throughout my home, all my electronic devices have been hacked with drones, culminating with being attacked in my house with microwaves from an aircraft."
The virus has genocidal characteristic: researchers have found that the coronavirus infects both fat cells and certain immune cells within body fat, prompting a damaging defensive response in the body. The United States has one of the highest rates of obesity in the world. Most American adults are overweight, and 42 percent have obesity. Black, Hispanic, Native American and Alaska Native people in the U.S. have higher obesity rates than white adults and Asian Americans; they have also been disproportionately affected by the pandemic, with death rates roughly double those of white Americans.
Why would Daszak risk his daughter's life by doing this? Seventy-five percent of people who have died of the virus in the United States — or about 600,000 of the nearly 800,000 who have perished so far — have been 65 or older. One in 100 older Americans has died from the virus. For people younger than 65, that ratio is closer to 1 in 1,400.
"To monitor New York City for the presence of novel variants, we deep sequence most of the receptor binding domain coding sequence of the S protein of SARS-CoV-2 isolated from the New York City wastewater. Here we report detecting increasing frequencies of novel cryptic SARS-CoV-2 lineages. Cryptic lineages detected from wastewater are resistant to some neutralizing antibodies." Nature
Dr. Daszak: "This summary contains the information for the 2014 and 2017 NIH and NIAID grants to the Ecohealth Alliance that funded the WIV research on bat conronaviruses. As the grant description shows, this research included gain-of-function / gain-of-threat research to make coronaviruses viruses more pathogenic using techniques including genetic engineering, cell culture, and animal experimentation."Source of document: Covid-references-International Center for Technology Assessment
Dr. Fauci told Rand Paul: “Senator, with all due respect, you are entirely and completely incorrect, that the N.I.H. has not ever and does not now fund gain-of-function research in the Wuhan Institute.” The N.I.H. used Daszak as its surrogate to do this. To hold Daszak responsible means holding Fauci responsible which the Democrats and Corporate Media will not do. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/20/science/covid-lab-leak-wuhan.html
This entry (above) refers to https://journals.plos.org/plospathogens/article?id=10.1371/journal.ppat.1006698f DATED NOVEMBER 30, 2017: Daszak claimed this experiment was funded by USAID, NIH etc. This is a lie. It was funded by the ChiComs. Ben Hu, Lei-Ping Zeng, Xing-Lou Yang, Xing-Yi Ge, Wei Zhang, Bei Li, Jia-Zheng Xie, Xu-Rui Shen, Yun-Zhi Zhang, Ning Wang, Dong-Sheng Luo, Xiao-Shuang Zheng, Mei-Niang Wang, Peter Daszak, Lin-Fa Wang, Jie Cui, Zheng-Li Shi.
Most estimates of the transmissibility of the coronaviruses consider these pathogens to be insufficiently transmissible and sufficiently susceptible to control measures such that a global pandemic has a very minimal chance of occurring. For this reason, increasing the transmissibility of the coronaviruses could significantly increase the chance of a global pandemic due to a laboratory accident. Because SARS-CoV is more transmissible than MERS-CoV, a relatively modest increase in transmissibility of SARS-CoV could increase risk, whereas MERS-CoV must be made significantly more transmissible to drive risk. That being said, even if these strains were modified to be as transmissible as pandemic influenza, the susceptibility to control measures of the outbreaks they cause would still contain a majority of the outbreaks initiated. Some researchers have posited that the transmissibility of wild type SARS-CoV is quite high. If they are correct, then increasing the transmissibility of SARS-CoV would not influence risk significantly because the risk of a global pandemic arising from an outbreak is already significant. Increasing the pathogenicity of these strains could also increase risk somewhat through the increase in global deaths expected, especially since most deaths from wild type strains are suffered by those with significant co-morbidities. However, if a coronavirus were modified such that it caused a global pandemic, their long incubation time and disease course lead to a pandemic that unfolds over many years. The fact that the outbreak evolves slowly gives public health authorities more time to adapt and expand their efforts to further contain the outbreak than the modeling conducted in this assessment suggests. If a strain with enhanced growth properties was developed and samples with 1E9pfu/ml or 1E10pfu/ml were routinely manipulated in a laboratory, the risk of a laboratory acquired infection in a coronavirus laboratory would increase by up to ten-fold, respectively. However, it is uncertain if this phenotype is desirable or even achievable given that the wild type coronaviruses grow sufficiently well in culture.
Mr. Heber's aviation career began in 1965 as a U.S. Army aviator and continued to serve in the Army Reserves and attained the rank of Major in the Military Intelligence Branch. In 1971, Mr. Heber continued his civilian education and earned his Bachelor of Science Degree in Aeronautical Science with a minor in Aviation Management, as well as an Associate of Arts Degree in Business Administration. His commercial aviation career began with the Cessna Aircraft Company as a Regional Marketing Manager, where he was responsible for the marketing of Cessna single and multi-engine aircraft and the development of Cessna dealerships and pilot training enters. He continued his aviation career from 1974 to 1979 with the Central Intelligence Agency where he was assigned as an Intelligence Officer within the Directorate of Operations/Special Operations Group. He has had experience in counter-terrorism, counter-narcotics, para-military operations, as well as the overt and covert collection of intelligence. His additional responsibilities included assignment as the Liaison Officer to the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Immigration & Naturalization Service. During this period of time he developed lasting contacts, both domestically and internationally, that have been invaluable to him in his business career. Mr. Heber does have a current TOP SECRET security and is a Special Investigator retained by the United States Government Department of Homeland Security. Mr. Heber is also a licensed Private Investigator with the State of Florida.
DISCOVERY OF A RICH GENE POOL OF BAT SARS-RELATED CORONAVIRUSES PROVIDES NEW INSIGHTS INTO THE ORIGIN OF SARS CORONAVIRUS
THIS DISCOVERY INSPIRED THE FRENCH TO BUILD THE BSL-4 LAB AT THE WIV
"Construction of recombinant viruses: Recombinant viruses with the S gene of the novel bat SARSr-CoVs and the backbone of the infectious clone of SARSr-CoV WIV1 were constructed using the reverse genetic system described previously. The fragments E and F were re-amplified with primer pairs...The fragment Es and Fs were both digested with BglI (NEB) and BsaI (NEB). The Rs4231 S gene was digested with BsmBI. The Rs7327 S gene was digested with BsaI. The other fragments and bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) were prepared as described previously. Then the two prepared spike DNA fragments were separately inserted into BAC with Es, Fs and other fragments. The correct infectious BAC clones were screened. The chimeric viruses1 were rescued as described previously." (Deborah A. Kimbrell is Associate Research Geneticist Emerita and Lecturer Unit Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, College of Biological Sciences U of C Davis).
1. A chimeric virus is a genetic chimerism or chimera is a single organism composed of cells with more than one distinct genotype. These experiments were creating novel viruses like the SARS-CoV19N.
ECO-FASCISM - TAKING ECOLOGY ONE STEP BEYOND RATIONALITY
Doctor "Daszakstein" wanted to see a pandemic engulf humanity to cut down human population in favor of vegitation and animal life, so he convinced Fauci, USAID, Pentagon and others to fund his PREDICT PROGRAM. This is why Daszak will never embrace the lab-leak theory, because he would be incriminating himself. DASZAK: "The implications of wildlife EIDs (Emerging Infectious Diseases) are twofold: emerging wildlife diseases cause direct and indirect loss of biodiversity and add to the threat of zoonotic disease emergence. Since human environmental changes are largely responsible for their emergence, the threats wildlife EIDs pose to biodiversity and human health represent yet another consequence of anthropogenic influence on ecosystems. More and more people are also living and working closer to wildlife. It isn’t about one or two individuals putting people at risk. The risk also comes from clear-cutting rainforests, remote mining, and even widespread suburbanization." Anthropogenic means caused by humans. Daszak tweeted this to IBPES "Most pandemics are linked to wildlife and human-caused environmental change, such as deforestation and wildlife trade." His Zoonotic spill-over from nature cover-story, however, fell apart after "an allied power," (probably France who built the BSL-4 LAB at the WIV), determined several scientists became contaminated with an enhanced SARS virus and brought it, within their bodies, into Wuhan, during its incubation period and after the FBI determined with moderate certainty there was a lab leak.
DASZAK KILLED AND SICKENED SO MANY HUMAN BEINGS HE IS THE NEW HITLER
How could one man cause all this havoc? He is a cunning psychopathic zoologist, although he is sometimes listed as a parasitologist. The lab leak theory has been entwined with politics, rather than science, thanks to Donald Trump who promulgated the theory alongside his bleach drinking remedy, and thanks to Fauci, who has become a target of anti-vaccination types and who must resign or be fired, because he approved Daszak's experiments. Daszak could have blown the whistle on the dangerous conditions at the WIV, cut their funding, and prevented the pandemic, instead he did just the opposite. He didn't do a thing because he is an Eco-Fascist who wanted a pandemic. He must be given a fair trial in USDC/SDNY then face the federal death penalty. There is recedent for charging Daszak: A Brazilian congressional panel recommend President Jair Bolsonaro be charged with “crimes against humanity,” asserting that he intentionally let the coronavirus rip through the country and kill hundreds of thousands in a failed bid to achieve herd immunity and revive Latin America’s largest economy. He was blamed for 300,000 deaths NYT
MINOR VIOLATIONS OF LAW
Daszak violated the law regarding grant subrecipients that required him to "Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: (1) Providing subrecipients with training and technical assistance on program-related matters; and (2) Performing on-site reviews of the subrecipient's program operations; (3) Arranging for agreed-upon-procedures engagements as described in § 75.425. https://www.govregs.com/regulations/title45_chapterA_part75_subpartD_subjgrp28_section75.352
In order to receive the grant Daszak had to sign-off on this declaration: "I am aware that any false, fictitious, or fraudulent information, or the omission of any material fact, may subject me to criminal, civil or administrative penalties for fraud, false statements, false claims or otherwise. (U.S. Code Title 18, Section 1001 and Title 31, Sections 3729-3730 and 3801-3812).” There is no statute of limitations for embezzelment of federal money. Fauci knew where the money was going - straight to the WIV to conduct these "maligned" experiments that Fauci thought might save mankind. Fauci let this GoF research out-sourcing go down. Program Officer Erik J Stemmy probably didn't approve Daszak's grants without showing them to his boss, Fauci. But it was Peter Daszak who caused the pandemic that setback humanity for decades.
Just as Robert Kennedy Jr., an environmental lawyer, uses anti-vaccination propaganda to increase the human death rate, Daszak uses his "small non-profit," as Dr. Fauci calls it, the Eco-Health Alliance, to do the same. Also see Also see robertkennedyjr.org
CHAPTER 2
THE EXPERIMENTS
IS THIS WHAT HAPPENED? "AN UNEXPECTED RESULT OF THE RESEARCH, AS OPPOSED TO SOMETHING THAT THE RESEARCHERS SET OUT TO DO" (LIKE CAUSE THE PANDEMIC)
The limited experiment described in the final progress report provided by EcoHealth Alliance was testing if spike proteins from naturally occurring bat coronaviruses circulating in China were capable of binding to the human ACE2 receptor in a mouse model. All other aspects of the mice, including the immune system, remained unchanged. In this limited experiment, laboratory mice infected with the SHC014 WIV1 bat coronavirus became sicker than those infected with the WIV1 bat coronavirus. As sometimes occurs in science, this was an unexpected result of the research, as opposed to something that the researchers set out to do. Regardless, the viruses being studied under this grant were genetically very distant from SARS-CoV-2. The research plan was reviewed by NIH in advance of funding, and NIH determined that it did not to fit the definition of research involving enhanced pathogens of pandemic potential (ePPP) because these bat coronaviruses had not been shown to infect humans. As such, the research was not subject to departmental review under the HHS P3CO Framework. However, out of an abundance of caution and as an additional layer of oversight, language was included in the terms and conditions of the grant award to EcoHealth that outlined criteria for a secondary review, such as a requirement that the grantee report immediately a one log increase in growth. These measures would prompt a secondary review to determine whether the research aims should be re- evaluated or new biosafety measures should be enacted. EcoHealth failed to report this finding right away, as was required by the terms of the grant. EcoHealth is being notified that they have five days from today to submit to NIH any and all unpublished data from the experiments and work conducted under this award. Additional compliance efforts continue. Lawrence A. Tabak, D.D.S., Ph.D. Principal Deputy Director
Dr. Tabak is the principal deputy director of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the deputy ethics counselor of the Agency. He previously served as acting principal deputy director of NIH (2009), and prior to that as director of the National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research from 2000-2010. Prior to joining NIH, Dr. Tabak was the senior associate dean for Research and professor of Dentistry and Biochemistry & Biophysics in the School of Medicine and Dentistry at the University of Rochester in New York. A former NIH MERIT recipient, Dr. Tabak's major research focus has been on the structure, biosynthesis and function of glycoproteins. Also see New York Times Bat Research Group Failed to Submit Virus Studies Promptly, N.I.H. Says
TABAK LETTER FROM COMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND COMMERCE
We write to continue our oversight of National Institutes of Health (NIH) grant awards to EcoHealth Alliance (EcoHealth). On January 6, 2022, the NIH sent two letters to EcoHealth related to its failure to comply with terms agreed upon for its NIH grants.1 While we appreciate the NIH’s current enforcement efforts to obtain EcoHealth’s compliance, new information from recently disclosed information included in the recent NIH letters raises troubling concerns about EcoHealth’s conduct upon which the NIH is either overlooking or taking insufficient action. Those concerns include withheld data and possible double billing, missing laboratory notebooks and electronic files related to humanized mice research at the Wuhan lab, and EcoHealth’s private donations that may not have been reported to NIH. These concerns raise the prospect of possible fraud that require the NIH’s heightened attention. In June 2014 and during the gain-of-function research pause in the United States, NIH awarded grant R01AI110964 to EcoHealth for bat coronavirus research. EcoHealth then entered into a subaward agreement with scientists at the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) for research assistance. During that time, EcoHealth also received awards from other U.S. agencies, including as a subgrant recipient from the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) to support scientific collaboration at the WIV.2 Through its USAID project work, EcoHealth catalogued human and bat genomic sequence findings into a database used to create predictive maps of potential disease outbreaks and reported finding a high number of SARS-like coronaviruses in bats sampled in China.3 EcoHealth identified several novel bat coronaviruses.4 USAID also supported sampling by EcoHealth and its collaborative partners of more than 7,300 humans and animals in China. The human specimens were obtained from individuals with symptoms of an infectious disease meeting criteria that the most-likely cause had been ruled out through laboratory tests and supporting data was available. READ THE REST OF THIS LETTER
EARLIER EXPERIMENTS INVOLVED THE SPIKE PROTEINS WHICH ARE THE KEYS TO INVADING THE HUMAN RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
IN VITRO AND IN VIVO CHARACTERIZATION OF SARSR-COV SPILLOVER RISK, COUPLED WITH SPATIAL AND PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSES TO IDENTIFY THE REGIONS AND VIRUSES OF PUBLIC HEALTH CONCERN (DASZAK)
JUNE 6, 2014 "We will use Spike Protein1 sequence data, infectious clone technology,2 in vitro and in vivo3 infection experiments and analysis of receptor binding to test the hypothesis that % divergence thresholds in Spike Protein sequences predict spillover potential. We will combine these data with bat host distribution, viral diversity and phylogeny, human survey of risk behaviors and illness, and serology to identify SARSr-CoV spillover risk hotspots across southern China. Together these data and analyses will be critical for the future development of public health interventions and enhanced surveillance to prevent the re-emergence of SARS or the emergence of a novel SARSr-CoV. Project Start 2014-06-01 / Project End 2020-04-24 / Budget Start 2019-07-24 / Budget End 2020-04-24 / Support Year 6 / Fiscal Year 2019 / Total Cost / Indirect Cost" https://grantome.com/grant/NIH/R01-AI110964-06
1. The spike protein is what gives the Corona Virus its unique name. It is the part of the virus that plugs into the ACE2 receptors in human lungs and allows the nano-particle to infect the human body just like plugging a USB cord into a port on your computer.
2. Infectious clones of viral genomes were initially produced in the late 1970s and early 1980s. The first was made in 1978 by inserting a DNA copy of the RNA genome of the bacteriophage QB, made with reverse transcriptase, into a plasmid vector. Infectious virus was produced when the cloned viral DNA was inserted into E. coli. In 1980, infectious cloned retroviral DNA was produced by inserting the integrated viral DNA from the cellular genome into a plasmid vector. The next year, a DNA copy of the RNA genome of poliovirus was produced by reverse transcription and inserted into a plasmid vector. When the cloned copy of the viral genome was introduced into mammalian cells, infectious virus was produced. The infectious viral DNA clone is a double-edged sword. It enables manipulation of the viral genome at will, allowing unprecedented genetic analysis and the use of viruses as vectors for gene therapy. But nearly any virus can now be recovered from the nucleotide sequence – effectively making it impossible to ever truly eradicate a virus from the globe. This was thanks to Baric "reverse genetics."
3. In vitro: The term in vitro refers to a medical study or experiment which is done in the laboratory within the confines of a test tube or laboratory dish. In vivo: The term in vivo refers to a medical test, experiment, or procedure that is done on (or in) a living organism, such as a laboratory animal or human.
DASZAK PROPOSED DOING EXPERIMENTS WITH BAT VIRUSES THAT COULD CAUSE A PANDEMIC: BUT DARPA REFUSED FUNDING BECAUSE:
1. The proposal is considered to potentially involve GoF/DURC research because they propose to synthesize spike glycoproteins which bind to human cell receptors and insert them into SARSr-CoV backbones to assess whether they can cause SARS-like disease.
2. However the proposal does not mention or assess potential risks of Gain of Function (GoF) research.
3. Nor does the proposal mention or assess Dual Use Research of Concern (DURC) issues, and thus fails to present a DURC risk mitigation plan.
4. The proposal hardly addresses or discusses ethical, legal, and social issues (ELSI).
What is SARSr-CoV that is being used to circumvent gain-of-function concerns? "Herein, we report the findings of our 5-year surveillance of SARSr-CoVs in a cave inhabited by multiple species of horseshoe bats in Yunnan Province, China. The full-length genomes of 11 newly discovered SARSr-CoV strains, together with our previous findings, reveals that the SARSr-CoVs circulating in this single location are highly diverse in the S gene, ORF3 and ORF8. Importantly, strains with high genetic similarity to SARS-CoV in the hypervariable N-terminal domain (NTD) and receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the S1 gene, the ORF3 and ORF8 region, respectively, were all discovered in this cave. In addition, we report the first discovery of bat SARSr-CoVs highly similar to human SARS-CoV in ORF3b and in the split ORF8a and 8b."
"Because Of its (now) known nature, the SARSr-CoV-WIV ‘s illness is readily resolved with early treatment that inhibits the viral replication that spreads the spike protein around the body (which induce a harmful overactive immune response as the body tries to clear the spikes from the ACE-2 receptors.) Many of the early treatment protocols ignored by the authorities because they inhibit viral replication or modulate the immune response to the spike proteins which makes sense within the context of what Ec-Health was creating. Some of these treatment protocols also inhibit the action of the engineered spike protein. For instance Ivermectin (Identified a curative in April 2020) is identified in the proposal as a SARS-Cov inhibitor, as is interferon (Identified May 2020 as a curative.)"
DASZAK WAS DIRECTLY AND INDIRECTLY INVOLVED IN RECOMBINANT EXPERIMENTS
Most of the recombinant experiences were carried out by Baric and Shi financed by the NIH and Daszak's re-purposing of Eco-Health grants. NOVEMBER 21, 2019 Daszak tweeted: "We’ve made great progress with bat SARS-related CoVs, ID’ing 50 novel strains, sequencing Spike Protein genes, ID’ing ones that bind to human cells, using recombinant viruses, humanized mice to see SARS-like signs, and showing some don’t respond to MAbs, vaccines."
GIVING A SARS-LIKE VIRUS THE ABILITY TO INFECT HUMANS INVOLVED RECOMBINANT BAT CORONAVIRUSES / NOVEMBER 30, 2017:"DISCOVERY OF A RICH GENE POOL OF BAT SARS-RELATED CORONAVIRUSES PROVIDES NEW INSIGHTS INTO THE ORIGIN OF SARS CORONAVIRUS"
Using the reverse genetics technique we previously developed for WIV1, we constructed a group of infectious bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) clones with the backbone of WIV1 and variants of S genes from 8 different bat SARSr-CoVs. [Ben Hu ,Lei-Ping Zeng , Xing-Lou Yang , Xing-Yi Ge, Wei Zhang, Bei Li, Jia-Zheng Xie, Xu-Rui Shen, Yun-Zhi Zhang, Ning Wang, Dong-Sheng Luo, Xiao-Shuang Zheng, Mei-Niang Wang, Peter Daszak, Lin-Fa Wang, Jie Cui, Zheng-Li Shi]
MANY OF THESE GoF / GoT EXPERIMENTS WERE CONDUCTED WITH VIRUSES FOUND IN HORSESHOE BATS - CLOSE RELATIVES TO THE SARS-CoV-19 VIRUS
Yuan KY et. al. assayed 13 different species of bats. The results proved that SARS-CoV in bats was the most closely related to that in humans. The SARS-like CoV in Chinese horseshoe bats has 88%-92% sequence homology with human SARS-CoV. Moreover, the S2 m motif in its 3'UTRs and the phylogenetic analyses of four fully characterized genomes of SARS-like CoV indicated that the horseshoe bats have great potential to be one of the natural reservoirs. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/ame2.12017
In MAY 2016 the United States Government issued a REPORT that contained a set of strict rules for determining which DURC GoF/GoT experiments should be funded by the National Institute of Health and other relevant USG entities based on Risk v. Benefit. There was a controversy in the scientific community as to the value of these experiments, however, Daszak was fully committed to performing these proceedures and continued to outsource them to the WIV where no such oversight existed.
THE BAT VIRUS STORAGE AND EXPERIMENTS WERE CONDUCTED IN BSL-2 CONSTRUCTED IN 1956 THE ELVIS ERA
Founded in 1956, Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), was initially named as Wuhan Microbiology Laboratory. It was among the earliest national institutions established after the founding of the New China. In 1961, it became the South China Institute of Microbiology of CAS, and was redesignated as Wuhan Microbiology Institute CAS in 1962. In 1970, under the administration of the Hubei Commission of Science & Technology, it was renamed as Microbiology Institute of Hubei Province. In June 1978, it was returned to the administration of CAS, and adopted its current designation.
BEFORE THE CORONA VIRUS OUTBREAK IN 2019 THE GAIN-OF-FUNCTION, GAIN-OF-THREAT EXPERIMENTS WERE PERFORMED IN BSL-2 LAB
For the Shi Zheng Li complete Question and Answer document where she admits to this click HERE
"Wuhan Institute of Virology, Wuhan, China (Zhengli Shi and Xingyi Ge) The Shi laboratory includes 4 rooms totaling (b) (4 , one equipped with two C02 incubators for tissue culture, one equipped facilities including with high speed centrifuge, 2 -20°C, 3 -80°C freezers, 2 PCR machines, 1 ELISA plate reader, one for molecule diagnosis equipped with two biosafety cabinets, and one normal laboratory equipped various small equipment items (mini-centrifuges, gel electrophoresis units, circulating adjustable water baths, and heat blocks). Also available to Dr. Shi's group is a fully equipped biosafety level 3 laboratory, a newly opened BLS-4 laboratory (the first in China) and Institute-supported facility center, which houses full-time staff and equipment for electronic microscopy, ultracentrifugation, confocal microcopy, and sequencing machine. Experiment conducted in BSL-2 Lab
“Everything is assessed on a case-by-case basis.” Studies of SARS-CoV-1 and SARS-CoV-2, for instance, have to be done in BSL-3 labs, whereas the human coronaviruses that cause the common cold are handled under BSL-2 conditions. What about bat viruses? The Wuhan institute’s biosafety committees ruled a decade ago that while work with animals must be carried out in BSL-3, molecular and cell-culture work involving bat coronaviruses can be done in BSL-2, albeit in biosafety cabinets with air filtration and under negative pressure to keep viruses inside. Dr. Richard Ebright regards this as unsafe. Bat coronaviruses are, as he puts it,“uncharacterized agents” with unknown virulence and transmissibility. “The only acceptableapproach is to start with a high biosafety-level assignment … and to lower the biosafety-levelassignment only if and when it is determined it is prudent to do so,” he told me in an email."
The FBI is the one agency whose views were identified in the Biden Report and it stated their was an accidental leak. Yet Carl Zimmer of the NYT continues to put one computer scientist's theory that the virus came from nature on the front page. Daszak is the number one proponent of the "it came from nature" theory to protect himself. Afterall, how could it be co-incidence that of all the places to first break-out, it was in the same city Daszak's experiments were being conducted on Corona viruses? WSJ on the Lab Leak theory
[The FBI] assesses with moderate confidence that the first human infection with SARS-CoV-2 most likely was the result of a laboratory-associated incident, probably involving experimentation, animal handling, or sampling by the Wuhan Institute of Virology. These analysts give weight to the inherently risky nature of work on coronaviruses...For these hypotheses, IC analysts consider an exposure that occurs during animal sampling activity that supports biological research to be a laboratory- associated incident and not natural contact....They also see the potential that a laboratory worker inadvertently was infected while collecting unknown animal specimens...[The FBI] assesses with moderate confidence that COVID-19 most likely resulted from a laboratory- associated incident involving WIV or other researchers—either through exposure to the virus during experiments or through sampling. Some analysts at elements that are unable to coalesce around either explanation also assess a laboratory origin with low confidence. These analysts place emphasis on academic articles authored by WIV employees indicating that WIV scientists conducted research on other coronaviruses under what these analysts consider to be inadequate biosafety conditions that could have led to opportunities for a laboratory-associated incident. These analysts also take into account SARS-CoV-2’s genetic epidemiology and that the initial recorded COVID-19 clusters occurred only in Wuhan—and that WIV researchers who conducted sampling activity throughout China provided a node for the virus to enter the city....[The FBI] finds the laboratory-associated origin theory most likely assess that WIV researchers’ inherently risky work with coronaviruses provided numerous opportunities for them to unwittingly become infected with SARS-CoV-2. Although the IC has no indications that WIV research involved SARS-CoV-2 or a close progenitor virus, [the FBI] notes that it is plausible that researchers may have unwittingly exposed themselves to the virus without sequencing it during experiments or sampling activities, possibly resulting in asymptomatic or mild infection. Academic literature indicates that WIV researchers conducted research with bat coronaviruses or collected samples from species that are known to carry close relatives of SARS-CoV-2. Based on currently available information, the closest known relatives to SARS-CoV-2 in bats have been identified in Yunnan Province, and researchers bringing samples to laboratories provide a plausible link between these habitats and the city. [The FBI] analysts that assess COVID-19 most likely originated from a laboratory-associated incident also place emphasis on information suggesting researchers in China used biosafety practices that increased the risk of exposure to viruses. Academic publications suggest that WIV researchers did not use adequate biosafety precautions at least some of the time, increasing the risk of a laboratory-associated incident.
[The FBI] analysts that find the laboratory-associated origin theory most likely assess that WIV researchers’ inherently risky work with coronaviruses provided numerous opportunities for them to unwittingly become infected with SARS-CoV-2. Although the IC has no indicationsthat WIV research involved SARS-CoV-2 or a close progenitor virus, [the FBI] analysts note that it is plausible that researchers may have unwittingly exposed themselves to the virus without sequencing it during experiments or sampling activities, possibly resulting in asymptomatic or mild infection. Academic literature indicates that WIV researchers conducted research with bat coronaviruses or collected samples from species that are known to carry close relatives of SARS-CoV-2.
• Based on currently available information, the closest known relatives to SARS-CoV-2 in bats have been identified in Yunnan Province, and researchers bringing samples to laboratories provide a plausible link between these habitats and the city.
• [The FBI] analysts also note that China’s investigations into the pandemic’s origin might not uncover evidence of a laboratory-associated incident if it involved only a small number of researchers who did not acknowledge or have knowledge of a potential infection. FBI IC VIEWS REVEALED
FORMER FDA HEAD SCOTT GOTTLIEB ALSO MAKES THE CASE FOR THE LAB LEAK THEORY
Q "What did you learn in the course of your research about the origins of COVID?
A. I learned that we're not going to answer this question absent one of two things happening, either we find the intermediate host, the animal that spread COVID, or there's a whistleblower inside China, or someone close to this who knows that this came out of a lab, comes forward, defects, goes overseas, or we intercept some communication that we shouldn't have had access to. Absent something like that, we're not going to be able to answer this question. This is going to be a battle of competing narratives. I think over time, the side of the ledger that that says that this might have come out of a lab has grown more robust and the side of the ledger that this came out of a natural species has not really moved. And if anything, you can argue that side of the ledger has been diminished by a couple of facts. Number one, we've looked for the intermediate host and we haven't found it. And number two, the idea that the market, this initial market, was the source of the initial spread has been firmly debunked, even the Chinese acknowledged that. And that was a big part of the thesis around the zoonotic origin, the animal origin, because the idea was that the animal was in that market. We now know that market wasn't the source of the spread. It was a path along the spread. Beijing has even acknowledged that-- Beijing had acknowledged it, right.
Q. But when you say intermediate host, you mean what happened between the bat and the human, who came in between.
A. There's an animal, maybe a pangolin, there's some other animal in between and it could have been-- it wasn't necessarily a bat and it could have been a bat to a human, but we haven't found the virus in nature. And there's been a pretty exhaustive search. The Chinese have mounted an exhaustive search, and I don't think that the fact that they've been looking for it proves that they know it didn't come out of a lab. I think that they would be looking for it even if they knew it came out of a lab. And the reality is if it came out of a lab, the number of people who actually are aware of that could be a very small subset of people.
Q. When you say came out of a lab, you were saying through a lab accident, not a construct?
A. Yeah. No, I don't think anyone, and the administration has said this in the intelligence report they put out that they don't believe-- they've sort of firmly debunked the idea that this was something that could have deliberately come out of a lab, or was deliberately engineered. But the possibility is that you've had labs doing research on novel coronaviruses, you had novel coronaviruses being brought to those labs, particularly the Wuhan Institute of Virology. We know that they were doing that research in what's called BSL-2 labs, lower security labs, where tight precautions aren't taken. We also know that the Wuhan Institute of Virology [BSL-4] was a sloppy lab. At the time that it opened, there was an article in the journal Science raising questions about the integrity of that lab where scientists at the time that it opened in 2017 [2018] said, we're worried about the procedures in this lab. We're worried about the training, we're worried about the way it was built. We know that the lab was conducting high-end research with the Chinese military. The French were in that lab and were eventually kicked out. And at the time that they were kicked out, they were aware that the Chinese military had moved into that lab. So there were circumstances created around that facility, and there were operating procedures around that facility that created a lot of risk. That doesn't mean it came out of the lab, but it certainly makes that a suspect location. And there was another lab. The CDC, the Chinese CDC maintained a lab literally blocks from the wet market that was first implicated in this virus that was also conducting coronavirus research in BSL-2 labs.
Q. So other than the whodunit factor, why does it matter? Why do we need to know who patient 0 is? And how will that affect the Biden administration's response?
A. Yeah, it matters a lot because if we determine-- first of all, if we determine that this came out of a lab or we even assess that there's a high probability that this came out of a lab, I think it changes how we try to govern research internationally. We're going to need something like the International Atomic Energy Agency for BSL 4 labs. We're going to have to look much more carefully about who's creating BSL 4 labs, the kind of research going on in those labs.
Q. On the global response, you wrote, COVID crushed the global order of public health cooperation. Are you saying WHO is just not up to the task?
A. Well, it's not just the WHO. I mean, past epidemics crushed the global order of cooperation. We just didn't learn the lesson.
Q. Was there quashing of information by the WHO?
A. I think the WHO, for too long--
Q. Did they cover up for China, is the allegation.
A. They weren't willing to confront China, right? They put out statements extolling China's behavior and how forthcoming China was. I mean, it's part of the record now. Tedros, it's in his Twitter feed, it's in the Twitter feed of the head of the WHO giving props to China for how forthcoming they were. Now, was some of that an attempt to try to give them public praise because privately you were giving them a harder sell? I think some of that was going on in the US with some of the tweets and the statements that we were putting out. I don't know that that was happening at the WHO level because I was talking to some WHO officials at the time and have talked to a number since. And I think the WHO really did believe China was behaving in sort of an appropriate way and was providing cover for them as they were getting criticized by other parts of the world. Clearly, they weren't. And I think that that was knowable at the time. I mean, China didn't share the source strains. Tedros of WHO didn't want to push China on sharing the source strains publicly because he said, well, they have no commitment to do it. And he's right. Under the International Health Regulations, there was no requirement that you had to share the samples. But there were requirements that you had to share samples of novel emerging respiratory pathogens and other settings. So clearly, the spirit of the International Health Regulations was that this should be shared. But because it wasn't the letter of the law, the WHO didn't want to push China publicly to do it, even though that would have been very helpful for other countries.
Q. You're talking about actual viral samples not the sequence--
A. Right. Actual samples of the virus because the sequence alone isn't good enough if you want to develop a vaccine or a diagnostic. You actually at some point need the live virus. Now, we eventually got the live virus because we had spread here in the United States but, you know, at least publicly we didn't have the virus until there was a case in Seattle. It's possible we got the virus earlier from one of China's neighbors where there was some earlier spread.
Q. That part of the equation being dealt with now?
A. No, I don't think the WHO has taken any steps to reform how it operates in a global crisis like this. Whether or not they're able to-- whether or not the organization has a self-awareness to do that and is able to self-organize to actually implement meaningful reform, I'm not sure. I think the Biden administration lost an opportunity to compel different behavior at the WHO by simply rejoining the WHO. I was critical at the time that President Trump made the decision to pull out of the WHO, I had actually spoken with him directly, urging him not to do it, suggested that there were other ways he could send a strong message to China short of pulling out of the WHO. But once we pulled out of the WHO, and we were going to re-enter, we should have used the reentry to extract some kind of agreement about the WHO engaging in some reform process. And as best I know, and as best we all know based on what's public, that wasn't done. The leverage was given up.
CHAPTER 4
FAUCI, NIH, STEMMY, DASZAK, COLLINS DOCUMENTS AND INVOLVEMENT IN THE PANDEMIC
FAUCI IS A PROPONENT OF THE ANIMAL SPILL OVER THEORY BECAUSE THE LAB LEAK ONE LEADS BACK TO HIM
A group of virologists, many of whom receive funding from Fauci's NIH, or as we say in the venacular, were on Fauci's pad, wrote: "The suspicion that SARS-CoV-2 might have a laboratory origin stems from the coincidence that it was first detected in a city that houses a major virological laboratory that studies coronaviruses." They claim it started in the Wet Market there. A large city in China typically has a few hundred wet markets. Why this particular one near the WIV? If the disease came from rural China, as Daszak suggests, why didn't anyone get infected along the way? But because Trump the Hump said the pandemic was caused by a lab leak, it became a partisan issue.
FRANCIS COLLINS RESIGNS
Claims it has nothing to do with his approval of Daszak's experiments! Ha! Ha! The Human Genome Project, which James Watson helped initiate in 1988, assembled a composite 'reference' genome of DNA from many individuals. Francis Collins was NIH director part of the time the study was conducted and did not participate in the actual research. Watson, who discovered DNA’s double helix structure alongside Francis Crick and Rosalind Franklin in the 1950s, said that genes cause a difference on IQ tests between blacks and whites. African-Americans represent just 1.5 percent of grant applications to the N.I.H. which Collins headed, but none of these grant applications involved Gain-of-Threat research, so what race are stupid, evil ones from? Scientists and public health experts have criticized [Collins’] efforts at studying Covid-19 treatments, saying some that ultimately did not show strong results — such as convalescent plasma and hydroxychloroquine — were prioritized over more rigorous research. NYT
ON SANJAY GUPTA'S CNN ORIGINS OF COVID DASZAK SAID IN THE VENACULAR: "FAUCI HE BE MY HOMEBOY"
GUPTA: These exchanges seem to assert that U.S. taxpayer dollars, via the NIH through your organization went to the Wuhan Institute of Virology and funded gain of function research.
DASZAK: Yes.
GUPTA: Which may, not definitively by any means, but may have been a source of this pandemic. What do you say?
DASZAK: That's just plain not true. Dr. Fauci testified publicly under oath that that's not true and he's right. We didn't do work that run against any of the rules.
Daszak knew they were being conducted in a leaky BSL-2 lab because he had been there many times in person. Was Daszak just negligent, or is there something sinister going on here? The answer lies in Entire EcoFascist Manifesto he co-authored along with his close associate Aleksei Chmura.
If the fallen angels [in the BRUEGEL painting] represent the evil mirror image of St. Michael and his cohort, so they also represent the mirror image of our own genetic kind—pathogenic organisms which are otherwise just like us, but have fallen from grace through an evolutionary (not spiritual) pathway that takes them to a netherworld where they can feed only on our genes, our cells, our flesh...In Bruegel’s curious chimeras, we find yet another analogy—for the genetic recombination, mutation and evolution that negative-stranded RNA viruses in particular undergo as they shift, morph and adapt to their changing habitat—animal cells... Perhaps he reminds us also that it is the nature of our interactions with wildlife—here represented as an evil entity for humanity to vanquish—which cause new zoonoses to emerge in the first place. Perhaps the EcoHealth view is that if we tread carefully, we might avoid those nasty little pincers waiting to nip!
CHAPTER 5
KEY UNWITTING PERSONNEL
There was no COVID conspiracy: Daszak manipulated several unwitting key figures and a SARS virus found in bats was genetically enginered to be a novel Covid virus or a natural virus, that shouldn't have been in the BSL-2 lab, escaped. The original SARS already had caused a minor pandemic: SARS surfaced in the fall of 2002 in Guangdong Province, China. The original SARS-CoV spread worldwide within a few months, though it was quickly contained. SARS-CoV was shown to be transmitted from civet cats to humans. In 2015 Baric and Shi Zheng Li discovered the civets contracted the virus from bats, then authored a scientific peer-reviewed paper that stated that virologists better keep a close watch on the bat viruses in China because they were poised to spill over and cause a pandemic. Daszak is not listed in this paper which was credible. The Chinese China built the BSL-4 the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) in 1956 but didn't give them the BSL-4 Lab, the highest bio-security lab, until 2018 because of dual use biowarfare concerns. The BSL-4 Lab is for diseases for which there is no known vaccine, cure or therapeutic. The gain-of-threat experiments should have been conducted there. This aspect brought the MIT Tech Review to it's senses about "conspiracy theory" being an excuse for a lab leak:
The CDC recognizes four levels of biosafety and recommends which pathogens should be studied at which level. Biosafety level 1 is for nonhazardous organisms and requires virtually no precautions: wear a lab coat and gloves as needed. BSL-2 is for moderately hazardous pathogens that are already endemic in the area, and relatively mild interventions are indicated: close the door, wear eye protection, dispose of waste materials in an autoclave. BSL-3 is where things get serious. It’s for pathogens that can cause serious disease through respiratory transmission, such as influenza and SARS, and the associated protocols include multiple barriers to escape. Labs are walled off by two sets of self-closing, locking doors; air is filtered; personnel use full PPE and N95 masks and are under medical surveillance. BSL-4 is for the baddest of the baddies, such as Ebola and Marburg: full moon suits and dedicated air systems are added to the arsenal. “There are no enforceable standards of what you should and shouldn’t do. It’s up to the individual countries, institutions, and scientists.”Dr. Daszakstein's unwitting assistant was Ralph "Igor" Baric, a former college swim team champ, a micro-biologist who specializes in Gain-of-Threat experiments. Just as Igor erred and stole the brain of a criminal rather than a normal person's brain for Dr. Frankenstein's experiments Baric erred by teaching the Bat Lady recombinant experiments that may have led to the creation of a highly contagious virus, not a vaccine, assuming that a natural bat virus didn't escape the WIV.Ralph Steven Baric, (born 1954) Daszak's former unwitting accomplise, who believed he was working to develop a vaccine, Dr. Ralph Baric, stated: "The experiments that they did under the conditions that they did them were risky. They're working on bats SARS like viruses that have never been shown to cause human infection. Well, there are some scientists speaking up, that can't rule out the possibility of a lab leak. Their papers indicate that they did much of their work with these bat viruses under biological safety two conditions. There are many more laboratory accidents or laboratory acquired infections BSL-2 as compared to BSL-3. We do all the research in our lab on bat related coronaviruses under biological safety three enhanced conditions. We wear portable air breathing apparatuses with tied back suits so the workers are protected from anything that might be in the laboratory."BARIC: “You can engineer a virus without leaving any trace. The answers you are looking for, however, can only be found in the archives of the Wuhan laboratory.”
Baric was able to increase the virulence of viruses by cutting their RNA into strips and altering each individual piece of genetic material. Baric was also known for his senseless experiments such as the creation of "no-see-um" viruses, through passaging1, that showed no traces of genetic manipulation. This technique, which was taught to Shi Zheng Li thanks to Daszak, was instrumental in making it difficult to determine the lab origin SARS-CoV-19, since virus was passaged to make it infect new hosts in an effort to determine which virus will spillover to humans. Baric also developed a method to bring viruses of the past, such as polio, back, through reverse genetic engineering. So a virus could never be wiped off the planet as long as its nucleic code existed. Nucleic acid is a complex organic substance present in living cells, especially DNA or RNA, whose molecules consist of many nucleotides linked in a long chain. Baric once gave a lecture on how to profit from a pandemic. Baric erred and caused a minor SARS outbreak in North Carolina 2003. Look at the document. Later, one of his SARS-infected lab rats bit a student's hand. Baric applied for patents for his inventions and had a large staff at the University of North Carolina. Baric visited the WIV and the Bat Lady visited his lab - thanks to Daszak bringing them together. It should be noted that "although GoF experiments can make a virus more deadly and transmittable many gain-of-function experiments were worthwhile. In 1937, researchers found that when they passed the yellow fever virus through chicken cells, it lost the ability to cause disease in humans — a discovery that led to a vaccine for yellow fever." But Baric's creations were often pointless. Baric's base salary is $190,300.00 a year.
At a regular basis, Dr. Baric will report the results of the teams research to Dr. Daszak and Dr. Shi and together, they will use this information to identify additional research priorities and design downstream studies. Ors. Daszak, Shi and Barie have published together in the past and participated on research project applications. Dr. Barie recently spent several days in Wuhan, China, where he discussedresearch strategies and collaborations with Dr. Daszak and Dr. Shi. He will work closely with Dr. Sims and Mr. Yount to prepare timely reports, share research and discuss future research directions with the group. Baric Sub-award Baric's base salary is $190,300.00 a year.
1. Passaging is the placing of a live virus into an animal or cell culture to which it is not adapted and then, before the virus dies out, transferring it to another animal or cell of the same type. Passaging is often done iteratively. The theory is that the virus will rapidly evolve (since viruses have high mutation rates) and become adapted to the new animal or cell type. Passaging a virus, by allowing it to become adapted to its new situation, creates a new pathogen. SCIMEX
They're working on bats SARS like viruses that have never been shown to cause human infection. This means they are enhancing them to do so - this is known as "Gain-of-Threat." MIT TECHNOLOGY REVIEW puts a lot of blame on Ralph Baric. However Baric's father was not a Nazi death camp executioner, like Daszak's father Bohdan, who justified his crimes to his son by inculcating him with Nazi ideology. Evil runs in Daszak's blood. Daszak's father, already a Ukrainian Nazi, voluneered to become a death camp executioner.
RALPH BARIC'S ROLE IN CREATING THE PANDEMIC
Ralph Baric, although at least one of his experiments seemed pointless, like developing a method that made it impossible to discern a artifical virus from a natural one, never funneled any of his USG grant money to the WIV like Daszak did but he collaborated with it. Baric did give a lecture titled "How to Profit from the Next Pandemic." Baric was a cowboy and out of control. His lab was known as "The Wild West." His experiments may have caused a minor outbreak of SARS CoV-1 in Chapel Hill, North Carolina in 1983. His experiments must be reviewed to determine if they were a threat to humanity. For 20 years, beneath the radar, Baric had been playing with millions of people's lives. In Wuhan, China and Chapel Hill, North Carolina, Daszak, Dr. Shi Zheng Li collaborated with Dr. Ralph Baric, and routinely created viruses more dangerous than those that exist in nature.
Dr. Baric had developed, and taught Dr. Shi a general method for engineering bat coronaviruses to attack other species. What was worse, Baric had developed a method of genetic engineering wherein it was impossible to determine if the virus had been altered, which he called the "no-see-um" technique after the pesky little, almost invisible, flies found at various beaches in the South. The point of doing this escapes me? The specific targets were human cells grown in cultures and humanized mice. These laboratory mice are genetically engineered to carry the human version of a protein called ACE2 that studs the surface of cells that line the lungs. The "Bat Lady" flew back to her lab at the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) and resumed the work she had started on genetically engineering coronaviruses to attack human cells using this technique that she learned from Dr. Baric. Her genetically altered virus, enhanced to attack human beings, escaped. It wasn't the first time a genetically altered SARS virus leaked. Evidence suggests that in 2003 a less virulent SARS virus escaped from Baric's North Carolina lab causing several infections.
When you are dealing Baric remember one thing. The University of North Carolina School of Medicine, ranked 17th in the country in total National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding for federal fiscal year 2020 and 5th among peer public universities, according the Blue Ridge Institute for Medical Research. The total dollar amount is $345,729,473, a jump of more than $29 million from FY 2019. This amount does not include research and development contracts with the NIH. The UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, which is part of UNC, where Ralph Baric works, is ranked 3rd in total NIH funding, 1st among public universities. Fauci has been his boss for decades. Baric signed on to the email calling for new Covid-19 investigation and didn't sign Daszak's email supporting the Zoonotic theory to disguise his part in the pandemic.
Baric, a former swim champion, described in this early paper how his lab was able to train a coronavirus, MHV, which causes hepatitis in mice, to jump species, so that it could reliably infect BHK (baby-hamster kidney) cell cultures. They did it using serial passaging: repeatedly dosing a mixed solution of mouse cells and hamster cells with mouse-hepatitis virus, while each time decreasing the number of mouse cells and upping the concentration of hamster cells. At first, predictably, the mouse-hepatitis virus couldn’t do much with the hamster cells, which were left almost free of infection, floating in their world of fetal-calf serum. But by the end of the experiment, after dozens of passages through cell cultures, the virus had mutated: It had mastered the trick of parasitizing an unfamiliar rodent. A scourge of mice was transformed into a scourge of hamsters. And there was more: “It is clear that MHV can rapidly alter its species specificity and infect rats and primates,” Baric said. “The resulting virus variants are associated with demyelinating diseases in these alternative species.” (A demyelinating disease is a disease that damages nerve sheaths.) With steady prodding from laboratory science, along with some rhetorical exaggeration, a lowly mouse ailment was morphed into an emergent threat that might potentially cause nerve damage in primates. That is, nerve damage in us. A few years later, in a further round of “interspecies transfer” experimentation, Baric’s scientists introduced their mouse coronavirus into flasks that held a suspension of African-green-monkey cells, human cells, and pig-testicle cells.
2002 Dr. Baric announced that he found a way to create a full-length infectious clone of the entire mouse-hepatitis genome. His “infectious construct” replicated itself just like the real thing, he wrote. Not only that, but he’d figured out how to perform their assembly seamlessly, without any signs of human handiwork. Nobody would know if the virus had been fabricated in a laboratory or grown in nature. Baric called this the “no-see’m method,” and he asserted that it had “broad and largely unappreciated molecular biology applications.” https://nymag.com/intelligencer/article/coronavirus-lab-escape-theory.html
BARIC WAS CONDUCTING SARS RESEARCH BEFORE A 2003 OUTBREAK IN CHAPEL HILL NORTH CAROLINA
A. Professional Development/Invited Presentations
Invited Speaker: Engineering the Genomes of Microorganisms. DARPA Meeting on “Synthetic Biology,” Menlo Park, California. March 2003.
Invited Speaker: Coronavirus Vaccines. NIAID. SARS: Developing a Research Response, May 30, 2003
Coronavirus Reverse Genetics. Layola University School of Medicine, March 2003.
Grant Review 2003
1. Genetics study section FEBRUARY and OCTOBER, 2003. Ad hoc.
BARIC'S LAB LEAKED IN 2003 AND CAUSED A MINOR EPIDEMIC IN NORTH CAROLINA
The Baric laboratory has pioneered reverse genetic analyses of CoVs and DENVs. Several CoV infectious cDNA clones are available in the lab, including SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV, conventional human and model CoVs, and several bat Co Vs with pandemic potential. The availability of these genetic platforms allows for detailed studies into the role of viral genes in pathogenesis, innate immune antiviral immunity, vaccine performance and design, virus-receptor interactions, entry and virus evolution.
The CDC reported: "DECEMBER 31, 2003 In the United States, EIGHT SARS infections were documented by laboratory testing and an additional 19 probable SARS infections were reported. https://www.cdc.gov/about/history/sars/timeline.htm
The North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) March 19, 2003: Two possible SARS cases reported in N.C., one in WAKE COUNTY [where Baric's UNC lab is located] and one in ORANGE COUNTY. Both cases subsequently tested negative. April 1, 2003: Third and fourth cases of suspected SARS reported, (one in WAKE COUNTY and one in Mecklenburg County). Both cases subsequently tested negative. April 8, 2003: Fifth case of suspected SARS reported (Iredell County). Case subsequently tested negative. April 9, 2003: Sixth suspected SARS case reported (WAKE COUNTY). Case subsequently tested negative. April 21, 2003: Seventh suspected SARS case reported (WAKE COUNTY). Case subsequently tested negative. April 28, 2003: EIGHTH suspected SARS case (WAKE COUNTY). Case tested negative. June 3, 2003: North Carolina reported its ninth case of suspected SARS, an ORANGE COUNTY man, to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). He was reported as probable on June 6, 2003, and then as a confirmed case of SARS on June 9, 2003, when CDC laboratory tests were positive. By the time North Carolina reported its confirmed case in June 2003, that case was the eighth laboratory-confirmed case of SARS in the United States. No further confirmed cases were reported in the U.S., and the transmission of SARS-CoV was declared contained in July 2003. https://epi.dph.ncdhhs.gov/cd/sars/SARSinNorthCarolina2003.pdf
HOW CAN YOU HAVE SARS-RELATED SYMPTOMS AND NOT HAVE SARS?
"THE EIGHT PREVIOUSLY REPORTED SUSPECTED SARS CASES HAVE ALL RECOVERED FROM THEIR SARS-RELATED SYMPTOMS"
APRIL 28, 2003: "North Carolina has reported its EIGHTH case of suspected SARS to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The patient is a WAKE COUNTY woman who developed a fever and respiratory symptoms after returning to WAKE COUNTY from a trip to TORONTO, CANADA. The patient is recovering and is under voluntary isolation at home. THE OTHER SEVEN SUSPECTED CASES OF SARS IN NORTH CAROLINA HAVE ALL NOW RECOVERED FROM THEIR SARS-RELATED SYMPTOMS and may return to their normal activities. June 3, 2003: North Carolina reported its ninth case of suspected SARS to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The patient is an ORANGE COUNTY man who developed symptoms after returning to North Carolina from a trip to TORONTO, CANADA. He is being treated as an outpatient and is recovering at home under isolation. https://epi.dph.ncdhhs.gov/cd/sars/SARSinNorthCarolina2003.pdf
SARS-CoV infected around 8000 individuals worldwide with an overall mortality of 10% during the 2002–2003 pandemic. Two of the North Carolina cases came from the Toronto outbreak cased by a woman who returned from Hong Kong but what about the others? As of May 7, 2003 a total of 328 SARS cases in the United States were reported from 38 states, of which 265 (81%) were classified as suspect SARS, and 63 (19%) were classified as probable SARS (more severe illnesses). There seems to be a disproportionate number of cases in North Carolina but due to medical privacy concerns we will never know if they were in or around Chapel Hill? (one case was reported there) https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5218a2.htm
GAIN OF FUNCTION / GAIN-OF-THREAT RESEARCH INVOLVES CREATION OF RECOMINANT VIRUS IN UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA IN COLLABORATION WITH SCIENTISTS FROM WIV
NOVEMBER 2015 "Utilizing the SARS-CoV infectious clone, we generated and characterized a chimeric virus expressing the spike of bat coronavirus SHC014 in a mouse adapted SARS-CoV backbone. The results indicate that group 2b viruses encoding the SHC014 spike in a wild type backbone can efficiently utilize multiple ACE2 receptor orthologs1 , replicate efficiently in primary human airway cells, and achieve in vitro titers2 equivalent to epidemic strains of SARS-CoV. Additionally, in vivo experiments demonstrate replication of the chimeric virus in mouse lung with notable pathogenesis. Evaluation of available SARS-based immune-therapeutic and prophylactic modalities revealed poor efficacy; both monoclonal antibody and vaccine approaches failed to neutralize and protect from CoVs utilizing the novel spike protein. Importantly, based on these findings, we synthetically rederived an infectious full length SHC014 recombinant virus and demonstrate robust viral replication both in vitro and in vivo. Together, the work highlights a continued risk of SARS-CoV reemergence from viruses currently circulating in bat populations."....While offering preparation against future emerging viruses, this approach must be considered in the context of the US government-mandated pause on GoF/GoT studies. Based on previous models of emergence the creation of chimeric viruses like SHC014-MA15 was not expected to increase pathogenicity. However, while SHC014-MA15 is attenuated relative to parental mouse adapted, equivalent studies examining the wild-type Urbani spike within the MA15 backbone produced no weight loss and replication attenuation. As such, relative to the Urbani Spike-MA15 CoV, SHC014 MA15 constitutes a gain in pathogenesis. Based on these findings, review panels may deem similar studies too risky to pursue as increased pathogenicity in mammalian models cannot be excluded. Coupled with restrictions on mouse adapted strains and monoclonal antibodies generated against escape mutants, research into CoV emergence and therapeutic efficacy may be severely limited moving forward. Together, these data and restrictions represent a crossroads of GoF/GoT research concerns; the potential to prepare and mitigate future outbreaks must be weighed against the risk of creating more dangerous pathogens. In developing policies moving forward, it is important to consider the value of the data generated by these studies and if they warrant further study or the inherent risks involved.
1. Orthologs are genes in different species that evolved from a common ancestral gene by speciation, and, in general, orthologs retain the same function during the course of evolution.
2. The concentration of an antibody, as determined by finding the highest dilution at which it is still able to cause agglutination (the clumping together in suspension of antigen-bearing cells in the presence of specific antibodies of the antigen).
Reported studies were initiated after the University of North Carolina Institutional Biosafety Committee approved the experimental protocol: PROJECT TITLE: GENERATING INFECTIOUS CLONES OF BAT SARS-LIKE COVS; LAB SAFETY PLAN ID: 20145741; SCHEDULE G ID: 12279. These studies were initiated prior to the U.S. Government Deliberative Process Research Funding Pause on Selected GoF/GoT Research Involving Influenza, MERS, and SARS Viruses and the current manuscript has been reviewed by the funding agency, the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Continuation of these studies have been requested and approved by NIH. [Fauci]
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA PRESS RELEASE NOVEMBER 9, 2015
FULL STORY "Researchers from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill have discovered a new bat SARS-like virus that can jump directly from its bat hosts to humans without mutation. However, researchers point out that if the SARS-like virus did jump, it is still unclear whether it could spread from human to human. The discovery, reported in the November 9, 2015 issue of Nature Medicine, is notable not only because there is no treatment for this newly discovered virus, but also because it highlights an ongoing debate over the government's decision to suspend all gain-of- function experiments on a variety of select agents earlier this year. The move has put a substantial standstill on the development of vaccines or treatments for these pathogens should there be an outbreak."Studies have predicted the existence of nearly 5,000 coronaviruses in bat populations and some of these have the potential to emerge as human pathogens," said senior author Ralph Baric, a faculty member at the Gillings School of Global Public Health and expert in coronaviruses. "So this is not a situation of if there will be an outbreak of one of these coronaviruses but rather when and how prepared we'll be to address it." SARS first jumped from animals to humans in 2002-2003 and caused a worldwide outbreak, resulting in 8,000 cases, including one case in Chapel Hill. With nearly 800 deaths during that outbreak, SARS-CoV presents much like flu symptoms but then can accelerate, compromise breathing and bring on a deadly form of pneumonia. The outbreak was controlled through public health interventions and the original virus was thought to have been extinct since 2004. Baric and his team demonstrated that the newly-identified SARS-like virus, labeled SHC014-CoV and found in the Chinese horseshoe bats, can jump between bats and humans by showing that the virus can latch onto and use the same human and bat receptor for entry. [ACE2] The virus also replicates as well as SARS-CoV in primary human lung cells, the preferred target for infection. "This virus is highly pathogenic and treatments developed against the original SARS virus in 2002 and the ZMapp drugs used to fight Ebola fail to neutralize and control this particular virus," said Baric. "So building resources, rather than limiting them, to both examine animal populations for new threats and develop therapeutics is key for limiting future outbreaks." Journal Reference: Vineet D Menachery, Boyd L Yount, Kari Debbink, Sudhakar Agnihothram, Lisa E Gralinski, Jessica A Plante, Rachel L Graham, Trevor Scobey, Xing-Yi Ge, Eric F Donaldson, Scott H Randell, Antonio Lanzavecchia, Wayne A Marasco, SHI ZHENGLI-LI Ralph S Baric. A SARS-like cluster of circulating bat coronaviruses shows potential for human emergence. Nature Medicine, 2015; DOI: 10.1038/nm.3985
BARIC'S LAB RAT BITES STUDENT
by Jonathan Latham, PhD
University researchers genetically engineer a human pandemic virus. They inject the new virus into a laboratory mouse. The infected mouse then bites a researcher…..It is a plot worthy of a Hollywood blockbuster about risky coronavirus research. But according to newly obtained minutes of the Institutional Biosafety Committee (IBC) of the University of North Carolina (UNC), Chapel Hill, these exact events need not be imagined. They occurred for real between April 1st and May 6th this year. The identity of the bitten coronavirus researcher has not been revealed except that they were working in a high security BSL-3 virus lab when the accident happened. Other researchers are also calling for restraint. In a paper titled “Prudently conduct the engineering and synthesis of the SARS-CoV-2 virus”, researchers from China and the US critiqued the synthesis in February of a full length infectious clone (Gao et al., 2020; Thao et al., 2020). And, in concluding, these researchers asked a question that is even more pertinent now than then “Once the risks [of a lab escape] become a reality, who or which organization should take responsibility for them?” The accident at the University of North Carolina (UNC) is now in the public domain but only thanks to a FOIA request submitted by Hammond (in line with NIH guidelines) and shared with Independent Science News. espite the FOIA request, apart from the fact that UNC classified it as an official “Reportable Incident”, i.e. that must be reported to National Institutes of Health (NIH) in Washington DC, scarcely any information about the accident is available.In part this is because the minutes of the relevant IBC meeting (May 6th, 2020, p109) are extremely brief. They do not provide any details of the fate of the bitten researcher. Nor do they state, for example, whether the researcher developed an active infection, nor whether they developed symptoms, nor if they transmitted the recombinant virus to anyone else. Neither do they reveal what kind of recombinant virus was being used or the purpose of the experiment. To try to learn more, Independent Science News emailed the lab of Ralph Baric at UNC, which, based on their research history is the most likely coronavirus research group involved (Roberts et al., 2007; Menachery et al., 2015), the University Biosafety Officer, and UNC Media relations. Only the latter replied: “The April 2020 incident referred to in the University Institutional Biosafety Committee meeting minutes involved a mouse-adapted SARS-CoV-2 strain used in the development of a mouse model system.”
“At the dawn of recombinant DNA, at the request of the scientific community itself, following the fabled Asilomar conference, the United States government took the position of not regulating genetic engineering in the lab. The “deal” that big science struck with the government was that, in return for not being directly regulated, principal investigators would take personal responsibility for lab biosafety, involve the public in decision-making, and accept public accountability for their actions. The NIH Guidelines and Institutional Biosafety Committee system of “self-regulation” by researchers is founded upon the principal of personal responsibility of PIs and the promise of transparency. The redaction of the researchers’ identities from IBC meeting minutes, in order to hide the activities of researchers and avoid accountability for accidents, fundamentally contradicts the core principles of the US oversight system and violates the commitments that science made. “There is no justification for UNC’s redaction of the names of the laboratory heads and the identities of pathogens. UNC’s redactions violate conditions UNC agreed to in exchange for NIH funding of UNC’s research and, if not corrected, should result in the termination of current NIH funding, and the loss of eligibility for future NIH funding, of UNC’s research.”
This concern over risks and benefits is shared by Edward Hammond. Using FOIA again he has further discovered that researchers at the University of Pittsburgh (whose identity is redacted) plan to make what Hammond calls Corona-thrax. In short, according to its Institutional Biosafety Committee, Pittsburgh researchers intend put the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 (which allows the virus to gain entry into human cells) into Bacillus anthracis which is the causative agent of anthrax. The anthrax strain proposed to be used for this experiment is “disarmed” but, Hammond agrees with Gao et al., (2020) that the balance of risks and benefits appears not to be receiving adequate consideration. This experiment was nevertheless approved by the Institutional Biosafety Committee of the University of Pittsburgh. But by redacting the name of the laboratory from the minutes and also every name of the members of the committee which approved it, the University has supplied a de facto response to the final question posed by Gao et al.: who will take responsibility for risky coronavirus research?
The accident at the University of North Carolina (UNC) is now in the public domain but only thanks to a FOIA request submitted by Hammond (in line with NIH guidelines) and shared with Independent Science News. Despite the FOIA request, apart from the fact that UNC classified it as an official “Reportable Incident”, i.e. that must be reported to National Institutes of Health (NIH) in Washington DC, scarcely any information about the accident is available. In part this is because the minutes are extremely brief. They do not provide any details of the fate of the bitten researcher. Nor do they state, for example, whether the researcher developed an active infection, nor whether they developed symptoms, nor if they transmitted the recombinant virus to anyone else. Neither do they reveal what kind of recombinant virus was being used or the purpose of the experiment.
To try to learn more, Independent Science News emailed the lab of Ralph Baric at UNC, which, based on their research history is the most likely coronavirus research group involved (Roberts et al., 2007; Menachery et al., 2015), the University Biosafety Officer, and UNC Media relations. Only the latter replied: “The April 2020 incident referred to in the University Institutional Biosafety Committee meeting minutes involved a mouse-adapted SARS-CoV-2 strain used in the development of a mouse model system.” UNC media relations also told Independent Science News that: “The researcher did not develop any symptoms and no infection occurred as a result of the incident.” Our questions in full and the full UNC reply are available here.
REDACTIONS OF BIOSAFETY COMMITTEE DISCUSSIONS
The second reason for this lack of information is that the UNC redacted the names of Principal Investigators (PIs) whose research required biosafety scrutiny, along with many of the experimental specifics. Nevertheless, unredacted parts of minutes from IBC meetings held in 2020 contain descriptions of experiments that potentially encompass the accident. They include: Application 75223:
In all, any one of eight sets of different experiments approved by the UNC Chapel Hill IBC in 2020 proposed infecting mice with live infectious and mutant SARS-CoV-2-like coronaviruses under BSL-3 conditions and therefore could have led to the accident.
BARIC SUPPORTS THE ZOONOTIC THEORY BECAUSE HE PLAYED A PART IN STARTING THE PANDEMIC DUE TO HIS ASSOCIATION WITH WIV SCIENTISTS
MAY 2021 Baric “I really believe that the genetic sequence for sars-CoV-2 really points to a natural-origin event from wildlife,” Ralph Baric said that sars-CoV-2 was different enough from known viruses that to retrofit it from an ancestral strain would have required a truly unprecedented feat of genetic reëngineering. And of course you don’t know what you’re engineering, because SARS-CoV-2 would not have existed." Another possibility was that a virus nearly identical to the eventual pathogen, which had been collected in the wild and stored in the virus repository, had somehow escaped containment, but he hadn’t seen any specific evidence to support that hypothesis, either. All that is known for sure is that a pathogen that likely originated in bats had transferred species and caused a global pandemic in human beings, perhaps in a way that had only happened a few times in modern medical history or in a way—through a lab—that may never have happened before. Baric’s preference was for the theory that resembled previous outbreaks." [Of course Baric would say this since he taught Shi Zhengli how to create viruses in the lab that could not be distinguished from those in nature and so he bears responsibility for the pandemic.]
CHICOMS BLAME BARIC
At University of Iowa, scientist Stanley Perlman launched work for the deadly MERS virus without faculty approval, the Des Moines Register reported in December 2014. Worse still, Perlman’s team conducted the MERS research in a biosafety level-2 lab, instead of a level-3 facility as is required by federal regulators, it said. GLOBAL TIMES
"THE BAT LADY" NEVER CONDUCTED EXPERIMENTS TO MAKE VIRUSES MORE DEADLY, JUST MORE CONTAGIOUS
Dr. Shi Zheng Li, a WIV Microbiologist and Director of the Centre for Emergence of Infectious Disease and Biosafety at the Wuhan Institute of Virology was known as "The Bat Lady" because of her interest in bats as vectors of disease. Dr. Shi, 57, obtained her Ph.D. from the University of Montpellier in France in 2000 and is a member of the American Academy of Microbiology. Shi was fixated on dirt:
"The pandemic is nature's punishment for an unsanitary lifestyle. So shut your stinky mouths. How on earth can I offer up evidence for something where there is no evidence? I don’t know how the world has come to this, constantly pouring filth on an innocent scientist. My lab has never conducted or cooperated in conducting GOF experiments that enhance the virulence of viruses. [Just the transmissability] This is no longer a question of science. It is speculation rooted in utter distrust. It’s really sad to read this ‘Letter’ written by these 18 prominent scientists. The hypothesis of a lab leaking is just based on the expertise of a lab which has long been working on bat coronaviruses which are phylogenetically related to SARS-CoV-2. This kind of claim will definitely damage the reputation and enthusiasm of scientists who are dedicated to work on the novel animal viruses which have potential spillover risk to human populations and eventually weaken the ability of humans to prevent the next pandemic...Another piece of evidence that I can give you is that our lab has been doing research for 15 years, and all our work has been published. We also have a library of our own genetic sequences, and we have experimental records of all our work related to the virus, which are accessible for people to check. Nobody was tested positive. None of us has been infected bycoronaviruses under any circumstances, including while sampling bats in the field. I just wanted to put my head down and concentrate on my work, I thought the storm would just blow over after some time. I used to admire the West. I used to think it was a just and meritocratic society. I used to think itmust be wonderful to live in a country where anybody could criticize the government. Now I think if you are Chinese then it doesn’t matter how good you are at your job—because you are tried by nationality. I’ve now realized that the Western democracy is hypocritical, and that much of its media is driven by lies, prejudices, and politics.”
Dr. Zhengli Shi, Senior Virologist. Dr. Shi will oversee the coronavirus screening for all samples collected in China. Novel SARS-like coronaviruses were detected in Rhinolophus bats collected in different regions of Guangdong province. Diverse novel betacoronaviruses related to HKU5 were detected in Pipistrellus bats and laio in Guangdong and in Asel/iscus stoliczkanus in Mengla, Yunnan. Novel coronaviruses related to HKU9 were found in Cynopterus sphinx and Rousettus leschenaulti in Mengla. In addition, sequences significantly divergent to other CoV were obtained from three samples of /a io and Hipposideros bats. "Bats: Depending on the species and size of bat, swabs wil l be taken from the oropharynx, urogenital tract, and rectum. Fresh feces will be collected if available, in which case a rectal swab will not be collected. Blood will be collected from fruit bats either from the cephalic vein or from the radial artery or vein using a 25 gauge needle and 1 cc syringe. Blood will be collected from bats weighing less than 100g according to published techniques. Principal Investigator/Program Director: Daszak, Peter" INTERCEPT DOC page 72, 167, 124
SHI ZHENG LI
Daszak's dupe at the WIV was Shi Zheng Li, the director of Bio-Safety. In January 2018, the State Department had visited her lab after reports of unsafe conditions. “During interactions with scientists at the WIV laboratory, they noted the new lab has a serious shortage of appropriately trained technicians and investigators needed to safely operate this high-containment laboratory, the researchers also showed that various SARS-like coronaviruses can interact with ACE2, the human receptor identified for SARS-coronavirus." Were the unsafe conditions the fact that the corona virus procedures were being carried out in a low level lab? Doctor Daszak knew the young Technicians and scientists were incompetent and sloppy. He knew Shi Zheng Li, "The Bat Lady" was a weirdo. Interestingly enough Shi stated that no experiments were conducted at the WIV to make the virus more deadly but never addressed the experiments that made it more contagious. Daszak put her in touch with the genius Dr. Ralph Baric and, with him, she co-authored a paper on SARS-1 coming from bats. Baric developed a method to alter the RNA in a virus by cutting the strands in seperate sections then re-combining them with other viral RNA. This man is more dangerous than Daszak because he has the ability to make a virus more lethal, but his motivation is to create vaccines, not a pandemic. In summation, Daszak who was at the epi-center of all this activity, knew how risky to humanity these WIV activities were and made sure they were conducted.
TRUMP AND BIDEN BOTH SAY GET VACCINATED AGAINST THE DASZAK STRAIN
TWO WUHAN INSTITUTE OF VIROLOGY SCIENTISTS, XING-YI GE AND ZHENGLI-LI SHI, USE REVERSE GENETICS TO GENERATE A CHIMERICAL VIRUS CLOSELY RESEMBLING THE NOVEL CORONAVIRUS COVID-19 (WHY COULDN'T THEY HAVE DEVELOPED THE NOVEL CORONA VIRUS?)
MAY 13, 2020: Two Wuhan Institute of Virology scientists, Xing-Yi Ge and Zhengli-Li Shi, use reverse genetics to generate a chimeric virus (one that has been created by combining cells of more than one distinct genotype) closely resembling the novel coronavirus Covid-19:“On the basis of these findings, we synthetically re-derived an infectious full-length SHC014 recombinant virus and demonstrate robust viral replication both in vitro and in vivo.” The Nature Medicine article also mentions, “Human lungs for HAE cultures were procured under University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Institutional Review Board–approved protocols.” The Chinese government’s poor record of transparency; the fact that the Wuhan Institute of Virology, a research center with facilities in the same city where the virus first appeared, was studying and creating new dangerous pathogens, including bat coronaviruses cannot be easily dismissed.
If the virus leaked out of a Chinese lab, every one through four Bio-Safety Level laboratory in the U.S. and Europe will be shut down and forced to move to more isolated locations. In 2010, by one count, there were 249 BSL-3 laboratories and seven BSL-4 laboratories in the U.S., and more than 11,000 scientists and staffers were authorized to handle the ultralethal germs on the government’s select pathogen list. Jamie Metzl of the Asia Society: “If zoonosis was the origin, it was a validatin of Dr. Daszak's life work. But if the pandemic started as part of a lab leak, it had the potential to do to virology what Three Mile Island and Chernobyl did to nuclear science. It could mire the field indefinitely in moratoriums and funding restrictions." So many virologists are circling the wagons around Fauci because of this and because he is the one the issues them their research grants.
ANOTHER KEY FIGURE TO EMERGE IN THIS DEBACLE IS ALEKSEI CHMURA
Chmura was educated at Kingston University Academic degree Doctor of Philosophy start time September 1, 2012 end time June 1, 2018; Columbia University academic degree Bachelor of Science Start time September 1, 2001 end time May 15, 2004. I call him Chumpura.
ALEKSEI CHMURA & PETER DASZAK'S ECO-FASCIST MANIFESTO
They seem to go back quite a long way Daszak helped supervise his Thesis. They wrote a quite bizarre letter back in 2007 called "A FALL FROM GRACE TO…VIRULENCE?"
In Bruegel’s painting of The Fall of the Rebel Angels we are witness to a tumbling maelstrom of falling rebel angels outcast from Heaven. Within the fray stands St. Michael1 in gilded armor, and his angels-at-arms serenely in pale albs, and almost as if threshing grain, hewing and striking down this inconceivable rout. The main focus of the image and what draws the eye is the extraordinarily creative mélange of creatures; mixtures of human, animal, plant, and inanimate objects slashing and stabbing as they fall from the great battlefields in the skies. They pour down in a vast column that stretches infinitely from the luminous sun; they fall from the light to the darkness. The column of falling angels is so numerous that it widens to encompass the whole lower canvas as it approaches the viewer. With a start, then, we realize that Bruegel intends that we too are in the thick of this. Will we succumb to the multitudinous horde? Are we to be cast downward into chthonic2 chaos represented here by the heaped up gibbering phantasmagory3 against which we rail and struggle?
1.Saint Michael is an archangel, a spiritual warrior in the battle of good versus evil. He is considered a champion of justice, a healer of the sick, and the guardian of the Church. In art Saint Michael is depicted with a sword, a banner, or scales, and is often shown vanquishing Satan in the form of a dragon.
2. Concerning, belonging to, or inhabiting the underworld.
3. A fantastic sequence of haphazardly associative imagery, as seen in dreams or fever.
Clearly Bruegel intended for us to identify with St. Michael and his comrades. The classic imagery of religious battles between humanity and evil, is straightforward fodder for us to digest, but is there another metaphor here? If the fallen angels [depicted in the Bruegel painting] represent the evil mirror image of St. Michael and his cohort, so they also represent the mirror image of our own genetic kind—pathogenic organisms which are otherwise just like us, but have fallen from grace through an evolutionary (not spiritual) pathway that takes them to a netherworld where they can feed only on our genes, our cells, our flesh. On closer scrutiny, we can see that Bruegel has depicted the Natural World—specifically chosen it as proxy for the fallen angels—for both its fascinating wonder and horror. Thus may we surmise that nature was, in Bruegel’s mind, itself as strange, wondrous, and horrific as the fallen angels that he depicted in the juxtaposed forms of otherwise anatomically correct fishes, bats, and frogs? Bruegel was an urban man and precisely because of his lack of intimate knowledge of Nature, he was likely able to observe it with such precision. No doubt he was influenced during time spent in France & Italy by that unique Renaissance creation, the scientific method, or means to learn about phenomena via empirical evidence. Today, we are not unlike Bruegel as we view the wondrously diverse animals and plants that represent nature, peering beneath this palimpsest the pathogens that threaten to plague us? AIDS, SARS, Malaria, West Nile Virus, and Avian Influenza are but a few of these fallen angels that have burst from out of the Natural world to wreck havoc causing countless deaths and economic losses.
In Bruegel’s curious chimeras, we find yet another analogy—for the genetic recombination, mutation and evolution that negative-stranded RNA viruses in particular undergo as they shift, morph and adapt to their changing habitat—animal cells. Here St. Michael is at risk of more than just the prodding of a sword. Here he is at the mercy of the tooth and nail of glycoproteins sharpened and honed to strike with precision through the gaps in his golden armor. As Pulliam shows in this issue of EcoHealth, this battle continues in reality as human encroachment into wildlife habitat, and the increasing globalization of agriculture, trade and travel bring us into dramatic juxtaposition with a seemingly infinite number and variety of viral angels hosted by the wildlife we contact and exploit. In this prescient scene, Bruegel reminds us that our battle against novel zoonotic pathogens is far from over: They lie in wait in a multitude of surely the same overwhelming dimensions as Bruegel's column of descending angels. Perhaps he reminds us also that it is the nature of our interactions with wildlife—here represented as an evil entity for humanity to vanquish—which cause new zoonoses to emerge in the first place. Perhaps the EcoHealth view is that if we tread carefully, we might avoid those nasty little pincers waiting to nip!
NAZI SCUM BOHDAN DASZAK MAKES THE ECO-FASCIST CHARGE CREDIBLE
DASZAK grew up with a hard core Nazi, his father, Bohdan Daszak, a rabid Jew hating scum and former member the OUN Youth, (Organization of Ukrainian Nazis or "Nationalists"). Peter Daszak is the son-of a Nazi death camp executioner who volunteered to murder countless Jews, and like father like son. Daszak was indoctrinated in Nazi thought by this Nazi war criminal: While protecting flora, fauna, water, and soil, the Nazis also murdered millions of human beings. The Christchurch mass murderer manifesto: "I consider myself an Eco-fascist by nature. The nation with the closest political and social values to my own is the People’s Republic of China." As documented here, Daszack is an agent-of-influence for the Chinese Communist Party, who led the W.H.O. cover-up. Daszak never says not a bad thing about China, including commenting on their human rights abuses, such as building concentration camps for the Uyghurs. Daszak was taught to respect fascism: like that of the CCP and his father had taught him concentration camps were okay. Daddy and China are keys to the fact that he is something other than what he pretends to be. Read what Facebook members comment about him!
DASZAK'S FATHER, BOHDAN DASZAK, WAS A NAZI DEATH CAMP EXECUTIONER
REICHSFUEHRER SS HEINRICH HIMMLER TOURING JANOWSKA DEATH CAMP LEMBERG, DISTRICT OF GALICIA, GENERAL GOVERNMENT (FORMERLY LWÓW, SECOND POLISH REPUBLIC; TODAY LVIV, UKRAINE). OPERATED BY SS OPERATIONAL SEPTEMBER 1941 – NOVEMBER 1943 INMATES JEWS
In September 1941, the Germans set up a factory on Janowska Street in the northeastern suburbs of Lvov, in southeastern Poland. This factory became part of a network of factories, the German Armament Works, owned and operated by the SS. Jews were used as forced laborers, mainly in carpentry and metalwork. In October 1941, the Germans established a camp housing the forced laborers next to the factory. In addition to being a forced-labor camp for Jews, Janowska was a transit camp during the mass deportations of Polish Jews to the killing centers in 1942. Jews underwent a selection process in Janowska similar to that used at Auschwitz-Birkenau and Majdanek. Those classified as fit to work remained at Janowska for forced labor. The majority, rejected as unfit for work, were deported to Belzec and killed or were shot at the Piaski ravine, just north of the camp. In the summer and fall of 1942, thousands of Jews (mainly from the Lvov ghetto) were deported to Janowska and killed. The evacuation of the Janowska camp began in November 1943. As the Germans attempted to destroy the traces of mass murder (Aktion 1005), they forced the prisoners to open the mass graves and burn the bodies. On November 19, 1943, these prisoners staged an uprising and a mass escape attempt. A few succeeded in escaping, but most were recaptured and killed. The SS staff and their local auxiliaries murdered at least 6,000 surviving Jews from various forced-labor camps in Galicia when the Janowska camp was liquidated in November 1943. https://ukrainianjewishencounter.org/en/the-janowska-concentration-camp-what-we-know-and-dont-know/
The day began with an inspection that culminated in mass beatings and shootings of prisoners. The weak, the sick, and those who had violated discipline were either shot on the spot or brought to the area between the two barbed wire fences, where they were shot or simply expired. Death runs were also carried out. This meant that a large group of condemned prisoners had to run the gauntlet of SS men, who tripped them with their legs or carbines, beat them over the head, shot at them, etc. There were two gallows in the camp. One of them was for prisoners who wanted to commit suicide. Every day the prisoners were subjected to abuse and beatings for no reason. There is evidence indicating that every day nearly a hundred corpses were piled on the garbage dump next to the kitchen. In other words, this was a daily, systematic killing of people, but the methods used were quite different. Special methods were used to kill women, and we have testimony about sexual violence and crimes in the camp.
Peter Daszak’s brother, opera singer John Daszak, revealed: "My father, Bohdan Daszak, (born March 21, 1926 died February 5, 1996 in Tameside, Greater Manchester, England) was a Ukrainian who had ended up in Britain at the end of the Second World War. Thankfully for him he was taken prisoner by the Allies and later released into the community rather than sent back to Ukraine and be dispatched with. He ended up in Manchester where I was born after he married a British woman, she was half Welsh and half English – so technically I am only a quarter English [laughs]. So I was brought up here but never really felt I always fitted in. It was only when I started travelling around I realised why my father was so culturally very different to those around me." https://seenandheard-international.com/2013/09/newjohn-daszak-genesis-of-a-new-british-siegfried-an-interview-with-jim-pritchard
FROM GIFTED LIVES BY JOAN FREEMAN
John Daszak not only had a powerful mother, but his father, Bogdan Daszak, had lived a life of exceptional bravery and determination. He had managed the extraordinary feat of reaching England from the Ukraine during WWII.[As a Prisoner-of-War] When he was about 16, in March 1944, the German’s had occupied his country. They captured him by going round the villages threatening to shoot the families unless the sons joined the German army. At that time the boys hated the Russians even more, and so were willing to join the the German’s who were fighting the Russians. But since the Russians and become allies of the British, the boys became enemies of the British. Many who had been badly treated ran off and escaped. Bodgen though was an educated town boy, not a peasant like the others, so he was used for paperwork in a [Nazi death] camp.1. He was eventually taken as a POW by the British. He could not know whether his family was alive, nor could he try to contact them becase he knew that is someone found out his was alive, they would torture his family. In fact Bogdan’s father was tortured by the Russians. About 40 years later, the the mid-1980’s, a friend spotted the name Zenon Daszak in a magazine and told Bogdan, who was thrilled to find his long lost brother alive. Zenon he said, was always practicing the violin, and though he’d preferred football himself, and he used to laugh at his brothers devotion. Zenon had become head of music Conservatories in Lvov in the Ukraine, their home town, and had played in the Bolshoi orchestra. Lvov was at the time under Soviet rule and it was forbidden for a Westerner to openly contact someone there. Bogdan though managed to pass his brother a secret message, along with his childhood pet name that no one else would know. They met in 1989 in Munich where Zenon was adjudicating at an international string competition. This had to be in secret shaking off the KGB. Zenon had named one of his sons Bogdan. Another one of his sons Uri had become a well known viola player. Both brothers died in their 60’s and John no longer and John no longer has contact with Zenon’s family. It had been particularly important to Bogdan that his family became totally British. He forbade them from visiting the Ukraine. https://www.google.com/books/edition/Gifted_Lives/ySItCK3A4uEC
Public prosecutors in Germany have indicted a 95-year-old woman for her role supporting the Nazi killing machinery as a secretary in a concentration camp, charging her with 10,000 counts of being an accessory to murder, and complicity in attempted murders. The indictment against the woman, identified only as Irmgard Furchner under German privacy laws, followed a five-year investigation, prosecutors said. Because she was under 21 at the time of the offenses she is accused of, they said, she would be tried in a juvenile court, where she is likely to receive a milder sentence. The woman worked between June of 1943 and April of 1945 as a secretary for the camp commander at the Stutthof camp, 20 miles from the Polish city of Gdansk, which was known as Danzig under German rule at the time. “It’s about the concrete responsibility she had in the daily functioning of the camp,” said Peter Müller-Rakow of the public prosecutor’s offices in Itzehoe, north of Hamburg. NYT
Those Ukrainians who did collaborate with the German occupiers did so in various ways including participating in the local administration, in German-supervised auxiliary police, Schutzmannschaft, in the German military, and serving as concentration camp guards. Nationalists in western Ukraine were among the most enthusiastic and hoped that their efforts would enable them to re-establish an independent state later on. For example, on the eve of Operation' Barbarossa, as many as 4000 Ukrainians, operating under Wehrmacht orders, sought to cause disruption behind Soviet lines. After the capture of Lviv, a highly-contentious and strategically-important city with a significant Ukrainian minority, OUN [Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists], leaders proclaimed a new Ukrainian State on June 30, 1941 and simultaneously encouraged loyalty to the new regime in the hope that they would be supported by the Germans. Already in 1939, during the German-Polish War, the OUN had been "a faithful German auxiliary." Few people noticed when they arrived in Britain in May 1947: one Labour MP, Barnett Janner, complained bitterly in the Commons that members of the Galizien division "murdered hundreds of people in cold blood", while a solitary letter in the London Evening News, signed with the correspondent's death camp number, 3399, complained that he or she had witnessed first-hand the "brutal, uncouth and bloodthirsty" behaviour of Ukrainian guards. Most newspapers devoted just one paragraph to reporting the division's arrival, however. The men were dispersed among PoW camps. Over the next three years just eight "undesirables" were deported to Germany, while some emigrated to Canada, the US or Argentina.
Daszak knew the viruses had leaking potential leading to a pandemic yet he did nothing even after the State Department deemed the WIV unsafe he continued funding the bat virus and collection work. A pandemic would delay human encroachment on nature. Daszak favors plant and animal life over human life. Daszak is not only an eco-fascist, but a eco-Fascist mole or eco-Fascist spook. What this means is that you can't tell where he is coming from, from his social media. He is not connected to the rightwing and has embedded himself in the Democratic Party.
DASZAK'S FATHER, BOHDAN, WOULD BE PROUD OF HIM
FROM GIFTED LIVES BY JOAN FREEMAN
John Daszak not only had a powerful mother, but his father, Bogdan Daszak, had lived a life of exceptional bravery and determination. He had managed the extraordinary feat of reaching England from the Ukraine during WWII.[As a Prisoner-of-War] When he was about 16, in March 1944, the German’s had occupied his country. They captured him by going round the villages threatening to shoot the families unless the sons joined the German army. At that time the boys hated the Russians even more, and so were willing to join the the German’s who were fighting the Russians. But since the Russians and become allies of the British, the boys became enemies of the British. Many who had been badly treated ran off and escaped. Bodgen though was an educated town boy, not a peasant like the others, so he was used for paperwork in a [Nazi death] camp.1. He was eventually taken as a POW by the British. He could not know whether his family was alive, nor could he try to contact them becase he knew that is someone found out his was alive, they would torture his family. In fact Bogdan’s father was tortured by the Russians. About 40 years later, the the mid-1980’s, a friend spotted the name Zenon Daszak in a magazine and told Bogdan, who was thrilled to find his long lost brother alive. Zenon he said, was always practicing the violin, and though he’d preferred football himself, and he used to laugh at his brothers devotion. Zenon had become head of music Conservatories in Lvov in the Ukraine, their home town, and had played in the Bolshoi orchestra. Lvov was at the time under Soviet rule and it was forbidden for a Westerner to openly contact someone there. Bogdan though managed to pass his brother a secret message, along with his childhood pet name that no one else would know. They met in 1989 in Munich where Zenon was adjudicating at an international string competition. This had to be in secret shaking off the KGB. Zenon had named one of his sons Bogdan. Another one of his sons Uri had become a well known viola player. Both brothers died in their 60’s and John no longer and John no longer has contact with Zenon’s family. It had been particularly important to Bogdan that his family became totally British. He forbade them from visiting the Ukraine. https://www.google.com/books/edition/Gifted_Lives/ySItCK3A4uEC
Public prosecutors in Germany have indicted a 95-year-old woman for her role supporting the Nazi killing machinery as a secretary in a concentration camp, charging her with 10,000 counts of being an accessory to murder, and complicity in attempted murders. The indictment against the woman, identified only as Irmgard Furchner under German privacy laws, followed a five-year investigation, prosecutors said. Because she was under 21 at the time of the offenses she is accused of, they said, she would be tried in a juvenile court, where she is likely to receive a milder sentence. The woman worked between June of 1943 and April of 1945 as a secretary for the camp commander at the Stutthof camp, 20 miles from the Polish city of Gdansk, which was known as Danzig under German rule at the time. “It’s about the concrete responsibility she had in the daily functioning of the camp,” said Peter Müller-Rakow of the public prosecutor’s offices in Itzehoe, north of Hamburg. NYT
Those Ukrainians who did collaborate with the German occupiers did so in various ways including participating in the local administration, in German-supervised auxiliary police, Schutzmannschaft, in the German military, and serving as concentration camp guards. Nationalists in western Ukraine were among the most enthusiastic and hoped that their efforts would enable them to re-establish an independent state later on. For example, on the eve of Operation' Barbarossa, as many as 4000 Ukrainians, operating under Wehrmacht orders, sought to cause disruption behind Soviet lines. After the capture of Lviv, a highly-contentious and strategically-important city with a significant Ukrainian minority, OUN [Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists], leaders proclaimed a new Ukrainian State on June 30, 1941 and simultaneously encouraged loyalty to the new regime in the hope that they would be supported by the Germans. Already in 1939, during the German-Polish War, the OUN had been "a faithful German auxiliary." Few people noticed when they arrived in Britain in May 1947: one Labour MP, Barnett Janner, complained bitterly in the Commons that members of the Galizien division "murdered hundreds of people in cold blood", while a solitary letter in the London Evening News, signed with the correspondent's death camp number, 3399, complained that he or she had witnessed first-hand the "brutal, uncouth and bloodthirsty" behaviour of Ukrainian guards. Most newspapers devoted just one paragraph to reporting the division's arrival, however. The men were dispersed among PoW camps. Over the next three years just eight "undesirables" were deported to Germany, while some emigrated to Canada, the US or Argentina.
Daszak knew the viruses had leaking potential leading to a pandemic yet he did nothing even after the State Department deemed the WIV unsafe he continued funding the bat virus and collection work. A pandemic would delay human encroachment on nature. Daszak favors plant and animal life over human life. Daszak is not only an eco-fascist, but a eco-Fascist mole or eco-Fascist spook. What this means is that you can't tell where he is coming from, from his social media. He is not connected to the rightwing and has embedded himself in the Democratic Party.
DASZAK'S FATHER, BOHDAN, WOULD BE PROUD OF HIM
SCIENCE MAGAZINE VERSION
Daszak grew up in Dukinfield, England, a coal-mining town outside of Manchester. His father was a Ukrainian conscripted to serve in the German army when the Nazis invaded who wound up a British prisoner of war in Italy, which eventually led him to Scotland and a job in a chocolate biscuit factory. He later worked as a draftsman and married a woman from Dukinfield. Daszak had 18 cages of reptiles at home. “I’m a lizard guy,” he says. In a primary school essay, he wrote that he wanted to become a zoologist and study marmosets in the Amazon. He studied zoology at Bangor University and earned a Ph.D. in infectious diseases at the University of East London with a thesis on electron microscopy of a parasite that caused an intestinal disease in chickens A postdoctoral [Daszak worked at the School of Life Sciences, Kingston University, in Surrey, England in the 1990s. He never earned a post-graduate degree Wiki] stint at Kingston University led to a collaboration with former surgeon Andrew Wakefield, now infamous for his role in the antivaccine movement."
LIKE DEMJANJUK DID BOHDAN DASZAK SERVE AS AN EXECUTIONER AT SOBIBOR EXTERMINATION CAMP IN POLAND?
Naturalisation Certificate: Bohdan Daszak. From Poland. Resident in Dukinfield,...
Ordering and viewing options
Reference: HO 334/436/60527
Description:
Naturalisation Certificate: Bohdan Daszak. From Poland. Resident in Dukinfield, Cheshire.
Certificate BNA60527 issued 26 April 1960.
Date: 1960 Apr 26
Held by: The National Archives, Kew
Legal status: Public Record(s)
Language: English
Closure status: Open Document, Open Description
Born in 1920 in Soviet Ukraine, John Demjanjuk was conscripted into the Soviet Red Army in 1940. He fought in World War II and was taken prisoner by the Germans in spring 1942. He was recruited by the Germans and trained at Trawniki concentration camp, going on to serve at Sobibor extermination camp and at least two concentration camps. After the war he married a woman he met in a West German displaced persons camp, and emigrated with her and their daughter to the United States. They settled in Seven Hills, Ohio where he worked in an auto factory and raised three children. Demjanjuk became a US citizen in 1958.
CHAPTER 7
DASZAK COLLABORATED WITH A NOTORIOUS ANTI-VAXXER
Wakefield asked Daszak to do electron microscopy of gut segments removed from Crohn disease patients. They found evidence of the measles virus, and Wakefield—“a charismatic guy,” Daszak says—went on to argue that the measles vaccine might be to blame for the disease. Subsequent studies made Daszak question the findings. “No one could repeat it,” he says. Wakefield was later discredited for a fraudulent study that linked vaccines to autism and has become a touchstone for vaccination skeptics. Daszak had 18 cages of reptiles at home. “I’m a lizard guy,” he says. In a primary school essay, he wrote that he wanted to become a zoologist and study marmosets in the Amazon. He studied zoology at Bangor University and earned a Ph.D. in infectious diseases at the University of East London with a thesis on electron microscopy of a parasite that caused an intestinal disease in chickens. Science
CHAPTER 8
DR. DASZAK'S HIDDEN AGENDA
Daszak financed DURC Dual Use Research of Concern (DURC) proceedures. The DURC experiments involved creating new forms of life, just as Mary Shelly's Doctor Frankenstein did when he created a homicidal monster. But the chance of creating a monster virus didn't bother "Dr. Daszakstein," who headed a "non-profit" called EcoHealth Alliance, because it was Doctor Daszak's intention from the start to cause a pandemic. Dr. Daszak is not a microbiologist. Daszak has no medical degree. None-the-less he plays a major part in the most dangerous experiments known to man. He's a world-class conman with a British accent and a hidden agenda, as stated, the son of a Nazi war criminal, a Ukranian who volunteered to kill Jews in a notorious death camp. Daszak never talks about the father who raised him, Bohdan. As for December 2021 Peter Daszak murdered 5 million including many Jews - and counting......Experts say that five million is an undercount. Many countries are unable to accurately record the number of people who have died from Covid-19, like India and African nations. It took nine months for the virus to kill one million people, three and a half more to reach two million, another three to claim three million and about two and a half to exceed four million. Feb. 4, 2022 More than 2,600 Americans are dying from Covid-19 each day, an alarming rate that has climbed by 30 percent in the past two weeks. Across the United States, the coronavirus pandemic has now claimed more than 900,000 lives.
DASZAK FOCUSED ON GAIN-OF-THREAT, GAIN-OF-FUNCTION RESEARCH FOR A REASON
DASZAK: "If we do the math on the previous emerging disease events the viruses tend to come from animals. Mammals cover the vast majority. You should probably include birds, because of Avian flu being such a threat. It is a stamp collecting exercise. Some of those stamps are penny blanks and you have to throw them out. Some of the viruses will be killers and some of them won’t. How do we work that out from a viral sequence? It is not straight forward. First of all we are only looking at viral families that include those that have gotten to people from animals. We have narrowed it down from there. Then, when you get a sequence and it looks like a relative to their known nasty pathogen just like we did with SARS – we found viruses in bats. Some of them looked very similar to SARS. We sequenced the spine protein, the protein that attaches to cells, and then you create pseudo particles, insert proteins from the viruses that combined to human cells. Each step of this you move closer and closer to could the virus becomes pathogenic in people! You narrow down the field. You end up with a small number of viruses that really do look like killers. And you look at the people in the region where the animal lives; do we see anti-bodies to that virus? In Cameroon it was a new virus coming into people. What is the activity and can we find the alternative? It is not straight forward, but there are many ways to hone it down. We had just got to do it. It makes sense for humanities sake." See video
Daszak : "We found corona virus in bats which looked exactly like SARS....My colleagues in China [at the Wuhan Institute of Virology] did this work, you create pseudoparticles1, you insert the spike proteins from those viruses, see if they bind to human cells and each step of this you move closer and closer to: a virus could really become pathogenic in people." Most of the experiments with bat viruses were performed with wild-type viruses.
1. Pseudotypes are biosafe, replication-defective retroviruses and lentiviruses that have been repurposed from gene therapy applications. They have heterologous (foreign) viral glycoproteins on their surface that originate from the viral pathogen. They thus mimic the wild- type virus with respect to cell entry, but can be handled by end users in biosafety level (BSL)-1 instead of BSL-3/4 laboratories. "Experience working with receptor mutants & pseudovirus binding assays: We have established a stable pseudovirus assay for SARS-CoV and SARS-like CoV and tested the infectivity of these spike proteins in cells expressing ACE2 from human. civet and bats (52, 68). We have demonstrated that several bat species are susceptible to the SARS-CoV and that some SARS-like CoV strains can use human ACE2 for cellular entry (Intercept 125) Minor mutations in S proteins or ACE2s greatly affected the receptor binding and finally abolish the pseudovirus entry (68, 121) (Fig. 9). Recently, we have discovered a number of alpha and beta CoVs including HKU4/5
We will use prepared pseudoviruses bearing different S proteins to infect human and bat ACE2 or DPP4 receptor expressing cells (in Hela cell model), 24 hours post infection, receptor usage by different S proteins will be determined by measuring luciferase activities. We will also induce site mutations in S proteins using site-directed mutation method, then do receptor-mutant pseudovirus binding assays. Pseudovirus infectivity on different human cell lines (A549, 293T, Caco, Huh?. and etc), primary and immortalized bat cell lines (listed below) and other mammalian cell line (mouse, pig, hamster, monkey, and ect) will be also determined by luciferase assay. The results will provide information whether bat-CoVs could use known bat and human ACE2. DPP4 or other known CoV receptors to enter cells. and allow us to determine critical receptor binding sites. viral host range, and to better predict the capacity of our Co Vs to infect people. (Intercept 118)
Daszak continued to finance the collection of exotic bat viruses and GoF / GoT experiments that were being performed in a low level biosecurity lab at the WIV - despite the fact they were banned in the USA and despite the fact he was not a microbiologist. Daszak knew if GoF / GoT proceedures were banned in the USA, where bio-security was high, they should not be out-sourced to China, where he knew first hand bio-security was minimal. Any normal person in Daszak's position would have seen red flags. But Daszak had a hidden agenda which was to start a pandemic, so he ignored them. The U.S. House of Representatives Foreign Affairs Committee: "Was Daszak aware the funding he was providing directly supported gain-of-function research by paying for the collection of viruses the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) later experimented with, even though the federal government had a moratorium on GoF research from 2014 through 2017?" Either a bat virus escaped that could directly infect humans or these procedures created a novel bat virus whose spike protein was genetically engineered to easily interface with the human respiratory system's ACE2 receptors, ostensibly to determine in which species of bat the next spillover to humans would occur. Daszak had predicted that a new virus would arise from a spillover. He called it VIRUS X. The enhanced natural bat virus that Daszak's crew created , or natural one they collected, escaped the Bio Safety Lab-2 facility, that had a much security as a dental office, and caused a pandemic setting back civilization God knows how long? Or the virus was one of the known bat-CoVs (including 630 novel CoV sequences) collected and stored at the WIV. Daszak puts the collection figures much higher. Perhaps it was the Rhinolophus Horseshoe virus or RaTG13 or RmYN02 that was altered? The virus was bio-engineered to be more contagious, not more virulent, accounting for the number of mild cases, before it began to mutate into something more deadly, such as "the Delta Mutation." The Delta Variant causes mucormycosis, Black Fungus, a rare and often deadly disease that has exploded across India on the coattails of the coronavirus pandemic. 44% of new Covid cases in NYC are attributable to this mutation. Fully immunized people with breakthrough infections of the Delta variant can spread the virus to others just as readily as unvaccinated people. The Alpha variant proved to be twice as transmissible as the original virus, and the Delta variant has mutations that turbocharged its contagiousness even more. As the virus continues to change, newer variants may turn out to be even more transmissible. In early August 2021 in Wuhan, the authorities started testing all 12 million residents after only three cases of the Delta variant were discovered. The cities of Sanmenxia and Zhuhai have also begun mass testing. In Beijing, where there are five infections, train service from 23 cities has been canceled. In the U.S. “This Delta wave just rips through the unvaccinated,” said Howard Markel, a medical historian at the University of Michigan. The deaths that have followed the wide availability of vaccines, he added, are “absolutely needless.” The variant is thought to be more contagious than previous versions of the coronavirus because the infected carry it in substantially greater amounts in their airways.
HIDDEN AGENDA: CUT DOWN ON HUMAN POPULATION GROWTH THAT'S DESTROYING NATURE
Over all, the birthrate declined by 4 percent in 2020. Births were down most sharply in December 2000, when babies conceived at the start of the pandemic would have been born. The New York Times reported: "All over the globe, countries are confronting population stagnation and a fertility bust, a dizzying reversal unmatched in recorded history. Fewer babies’ cries. More abandoned homes. Toward the middle of this century, as deaths start to exceed births, changes will come that are hard to fathom." When one of SHI, BARIC, DASZAK designer viruses escaped, 3,840,528 people died and 177,559,790 were infected. In the United States, life expectancy fell by a full year in the first six months of 2020; for Black Americans, the drop was 2.7 years. [Daszak employs no blacks at his Eco-Health Alliance operation.] December 2020 had the single largest decline of any month. Over all for the year, births declined by 4 percent, the data showed. There were 3,605,201 births in the United States last year, the lowest number since 1979. The International Monetary Fund predicts that the global economy will lose over $22 trillion between 2020 and 2025. A major part of Eco-Fascism's agenda was fullfilled. To an ecofascist, in order to achieve both environmental and social purity, people of color and immigrants must sacrifice themselves for the good of the planet. From 2019 to 2020, Hispanic people experienced the greatest drop in life expectancy — three years — and Black Americans saw a decrease of 2.9 years. White people experienced the smallest decline, of 1.2 years. Deaths exceed births in Alabama Nearly 15 million more people died during the pandemic than would have in normal times, the World Health Organization said a staggering measure of Covid’s true toll that laid bare how vastly country after country has undercounted victims. April 26, 2022: Sixty percent of Americans, including 75 percent of children, had been infected with the coronavirus by February 2022, federal health officials reported — another remarkable milestone in a pandemic that continues to confound expectations. The highly contagious Omicron variant was responsible for much of the toll. Global cases surpass 400 million! The number of women in the United States who died during pregnancy or shortly after giving birth increased sharply during the first year of the coronavirus pandemic, according to a new study, an increase that health officials attribute partly to Covid and pandemic-related disruptions. The new report, from the National Center for Health Statistics, found that the number of maternal deaths rose 14 percent, to 861 in 2020 from 754 in 2019. Black women in America experienced the most deaths: One-third of the pregnant women and new mothers who died in 2020 were Black, though Black Americans make up just over 13 percent of the population. Their mortality rate was nearly three times that of white women. By May 15, 2022 one million Americans had died, including my first wife, Ann Christine Duncan-Weberman. CDC reported: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/hestat/maternal-mortality/2020/maternal-mortality-rates-2020.htm
DASZAK FINANCED WIV GAIN-OF-THREAT EXPERIMENTS WITH YOUR TAXPAYER MONEY
Did the organization have aggregate revenues or expenses of more than $10,000 from grantmaking, fundraising, business, investment, and program service activit1es outside the United States, or aggregate foreign investments valued at $100,000 or more? If "Yes," complete Schedule F, Parts I and IV. YES
Did the organization report on Part IX, column (A), line 3, more than $5,000 of aggregate grants or other assistance to or for foreign Individuals? If "Yes," complete Schedule F, Parts III and IV. YES
Was any supported organization not organized in the United States ("foreign supported organization")' If "Yes" and if you checked 12a or 12b to Part I, answer (b) and (c) below 4ab Did the organization have ultimate control and discretion in deciding whether to make grants to the foreign supported organization? If "Yes," describe in Part VI how the organization had such control and discretion despite being controlled or 4b supervised by or in connection with its supported organizations c. Did the organization support any foreign supported organization that does not have an IRS determination under sections 501 (c)( 3) and 509 (a) ( 1) or (2)' If "Yes," explain in Part VI what controls the organization used to ensure that all support to the foreign supported organtzation was used exclusively for section 170(c)(2)(8) purposes. LEFT BLANK
GAIN-OF-FUNCTION / GAIN-OF-THREAT OUTSOURCED TO WUHAN INSTITUTE OF VIROLOGY AFTER AMERICA BANS IT AS TOO DANGEROUS
2014-2019Daily Mail:"The US National Institutes of Health (NIH) funded bat-coronavirus research in the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China to the tune of US$3.7 million. Back in October 2014, the US government had placed a federal moratorium on gain-of-function (GoF) research – altering natural pathogens to make them more deadly and infectious – as a result of rising fears about a possible pandemic caused by an accidental or deliberate release of these genetically engineered monster germs.1 A portion of $3.7 million in grants awarded between 2014 and 2019 by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) funded research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China. However, not all of that $3.7 million went to the WIV, and not all of the funding took place under the Obama administration. Approximately $700,000 of the $3.7 million total was approved under Donald Trump."
1. The funding was laundered though Daszak's ECOHEALTH ALLIANCE.
Daszak was one of the first men to find out about the virus becqause he was expecting a virus to leak and told his assets in China to be on the lookout for it. His story about how he first heard about it is full of contradictions. He told Wired: "On the night after the first Covid-19 post on December 31, 2019, which would be January 1, 2020, Dr. Peter Daszak,a disease ecologist and president of the EcoHealth Alliance, interrupted Marjorie Pollack’s New Year’s Eve dinner [December 31, 2019] to relay details his Mandarin-speaking staff members had picked up from China. Early lab work done in the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) showed the novel coronavirus behind Covid-19 had 80 percent homology—similarity due to shared ancestry—with the 2003 coronavirus that caused SARS. Daszak wanted the ProMED volunteers to know, he says, because “they are a gold standard for information.” He went on: "I got hold of Marjorie Pollack on New Year’s Eve [December 31, 2019], and as the champagne was getting warm we realized something really serious was going on in China. We had it from a good source that this was a coronavirus and that it was 20% different to SARS. So we knew that SARS was pretty good at transmitting from person to person; we knew it had a 10% mortality rate. That’s a huge red flag. I really knew something was wrong when every single senior person that I was trying to get hold of in China was busy. I sent a really long text to George Gao, who’s head of the CDC. I offered to send a team out there, to come out there and do anything to support them, and I got the shortest response ever from George, which was "Happy New Year." Wired March 5, 2020
December 31, 2019 the World Health Organization's Country Office in the People’s Republic of China picked up a media statement by the Wuhan Municipal Health Commission from their website on cases of ‘viral pneumonia’ in Wuhan, People’s Republic of China. The night after this was January 1, 2019 First Daszak says it came from his his Mandarin-speaking staff members then he says he and Dr. Pollack had the same source in China. He was concealing the fact that he was the first to become aware of SARS-CoV-19 from his Bat Lady dupe at the WIV, Shi Zheng Li.
Dr. Shi: "I have been working on the discovery and characterization of novel viruses from bats and other wildlife since 2004. This included the discovery that Chinese horseshoe bats are the natural reservoir of SARSr-CoVs and the likely origin of SARS-CoV. My group then isolated SARSr-CoVs from bats sharing high homology with human SARS-CoV and demonstrated their interspecies transmission risk, largely confirming bats as the source of SARs" (Intercept 352)
"While much of the public debate was initially focused on the Huanan seafood market in Wuhan as the origin of the pandemic, the preponderance of evidence now suggests that the virus leaked from the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Given the WIV’s demonstrated history of conducting gain-of-function experiments on coronaviruses, including genetically manipulating viruses specifically to make them infectious to humans in BSL-2 labs, as well as their possession of one of the world’s largest of coronaviruses, it is completely plausible that one or more researcher(s) was accidentally infected and carried the virus out of the lab. The evidence outlined above, combined the cover-up conducted CCP authorities, strongly suggest the Wuhan Institute of Virology as the source of the current pandemic.... After this extensive investigation, we believe it is time to call Peter Daszak to testify before Congress. There are still many outstanding questions about the type of research he funded at the WIV that only he can answer. In addition, we believe there is legislation Congress can pass that would not only hold those responsible accountable but also help to prevent a future pandemic, including but not limited to:
Institute a ban on conducting and funding any work that includes gain-of-function research until an international and legally binding standard is set, and only where that standard is verifiably being followed.
Sanction the Chinese Academy of Sciences and affiliated entities.
List the Wuhan Institute of Virology and its leadership on the Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List and apply additional, appropriate secondary sanctions.
Authorize new sanctions for academic, governmental, and military bioresearch facilities that fail to ensure the appropriate levels of safety and information sharing."
Get to know our scientists! Andrew Huff, Ph.D. Associate Vice President Dr. Andrew Huff began his formal education after two combat tours of duty as an infantryman in Operation Enduring Freedom throughout Central America and in Iraq. After earning a bachelors degree in psychology, and masters degrees in security technologies and geographic information systems (GIS), he was appointed a research fellow at the National Center for Food Protection and Defense (NCFPD) while earning a Ph.D. in Environmental Health specializing in emerging and environmental infectious disease at the University of Minnesota. ECOHEALTH NEWSLETTER
Dr. Andrew Huff filed this request with the Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency of the United States of America:
My name is Dr. Andrew Huff, and I am working with the House Select Committee on Intelligence with Mr. Ravi Batra, Ravi Batra Law, related to the investigation into the origin of COVID. For the past 2 months I have been under constant surveillance in all forms, my house has been broken into, hard drives have been stolen, electronic eavesdropping equipment has been installed throughout my home, all my electronic devices have been hacked with drones, culminating with being attacked in my house with microwaves from an aircraft. This is due to me revealing that Dr. Peter Daszak of EcoHealth Alliance stated to me that he was working with the CIA. SOURCE MUCKROCK
CHAPTER 11
BIDEN REDACTED REPORT
intellcomm.pdf
The IC [Who is the Intelligence Community?] assesses that SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, probably emerged and infected humans through an initial small-scale exposure that occurred no later than November 2019 with the first known cluster of COVID-19 cases arising in Wuhan, China in December 2019. In addition, the IC was able to reach broad agreement on several other key issues. We judge the virus was not developed as a biological weapon. Most agencies also assess with low confidence that SARS-CoV-2 probably was not genetically engineered; however, two agencies believe there was not sufficient evidence to make an assessment either way. Finally, the IC assesses China’s officials did not have foreknowledge of the virus before the initial outbreak of COVID-19 emerged. After examining all available intelligence reporting and other information, though, the IC remains divided on the most likely origin of COVID-19. All agencies assess that two hypotheses are plausible: natural exposure to an infected animal and a laboratory-associated incident. Four IC elements and the National Intelligence Council assess with low confidence that the initial SARS-CoV-2 infection was most likely caused by natural exposure to an animal infected with it or a close progenitor virus—a virus that probably would be more than 99 percent similar to SARS-CoV-2. These analysts give weight to China’s officials’ lack of foreknowledge, the numerous vectors for natural exposure, and other factors. One IC element assesses with moderate confidence that the first human infection with SARS-CoV-2 most likely was the result of a laboratory-associated incident, probably involving experimentation, animal handling, or sampling by the Wuhan Institute of Virology. These analysts give weight to the inherently risky nature of work on coronaviruses.
"The IC assesses that SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, probably emerged and infected humans through an initial small-scale exposure" if it started at the Wuhan Market it would have been large scale "that occurred no later than November 2019 with the first known cluster of COVID-19 cases arising in Wuhan, China in December 2019. In addition, the IC was able to reach broad agreement on several other key issues. We judge the virus was not developed as a biological weapon. [If it was why are the Chinese vaccines ineffective?] Most agencies also assess with low confidence that SARS-CoV-2 probably was not genetically engineered; however, two agencies believe there was not sufficient evidence to make an assessment either way. Finally, the IC assesses China’s officials did not have foreknowledge of the virus before the initial outbreak of COVID-19 emerged." Unless we know which Agency made each assesment the information is meaningless.
After examining all available intelligence reporting and other information, though, the IC remains divided on the most likely origin of COVID-19. All agencies assess that two hypotheses are plausible: natural exposure to an infected animal and a laboratory-associated incident. Four IC elements and the National Intelligence Council assess with low confidence that the initial SARS-CoV-2 infection was most likely caused by natural exposure to an animal infected with it or a close progenitor virus—a virus that probably would be more than 99 percent similar to SARS-CoV-2. These analysts give weight to China’s officials’ lack of foreknowledge, the numerous vectors for natural exposure, and other factors. One IC element assesses with moderate confidence that the first human infection with SARS-CoV-2 most likely was the result of a laboratory-associated incident, probably involving experimentation, animal handling, or sampling by the Wuhan Institute of Virology. These analysts give weight to the inherently risky nature of work on coronaviruses.Unless we know which Agency made each assesment the information is meaningless.
Analysts at three IC elements remain unable to coalesce around either explanation without additional information, with some analysts favoring natural origin, others a laboratory origin, and some seeing the hypotheses as equally likely. Variations in analytic views largely stem from differences in how agencies weigh intelligence reporting and scientific publications, and intelligence and scientific gaps. The IC judges they will be unable to provide a more definitive explanation for the origin of COVID-19 unless new information allows them to determine the specific pathway for initial natural contact with an animal or to determine that a laboratory in Wuhan was handling SARSCoV-2 or a close progenitor virus before COVID-19 emerged. The IC—and the global scientific community—lacks clinical samples or a complete understanding of epidemiological data from the earliest COVID-19 cases. If we obtain information on the earliest cases that identified a location of interest or occupational exposure, it may alter our evaluation of hypotheses. China’s cooperation most likely would be needed to reach a conclusive assessment of the origins of COVID-19. Beijing, however, continues to hinder the global investigation, resist sharing information and blame other countries, including the United States. These actions reflect, in part, China’s government’s own uncertainty about where an investigation could lead as well as its frustration the international community is using the issue to exert political pressure on China.
CHAPTER 12
AN ACCIDENT TOOK PLACE AT THE WIV
Three unidentified workers from the Wuhan Institute of Virology went to the hospital in November 2019 with flu-like symptoms. WAPO: "In China, people visit the hospital for routine and mild illnesses." However the intelligence came from the French who built the high containment lab at the WIV and was a result of an inquiry to the French about what to do about this accident. How to decontaminate the labs.
DASZAK: I remember specifically asking the Wuhan lab director and the staff about people who got sick, and we repeated that and pushed and asked pretty tough questions around that and they refuted it.
GUPTA: According to the Wuhan Institute of Virology on practices, they would have taken blood samples around that time.
DASZAK: Yes.
GUPTA: Did you get to see those blood samples?
DASZAK: No. No. But we did ask them. We asked them if they do that, they confirmed that they did take sample, that they tested them after the outbreak and that they were negative for COVID.
GUPTA (voice-over): The same missing pathogen database containing thousands of bat coronavirus entries that was taken offline by WIV in September of 2019.
ALINA CHAN, BROAD INSTITUTE: So this is a database that the mission was to collect all the viruses in the wild and use it to help prevent pandemics. So this is a pandemic. So why didn't they share that database with other scientists so they could figure out how dangerous this virus, where did it come from? [A Chinese news outlet accused her of “filthy behavior and a lack of basic academic ethics,” and readers piled on that she was a “race-traitor,” because of her Chinese ancestry. To scientists and editors “who are directly or indirectly covering up severe research integrity issues surrounding the key SARS-2-like viruses to stop and think. If your actions obscure SARS2 origins, you’re playing a hand in the death of millions of people.” ]
GUPTA (on-camera): What is the status of that database now? Have you been able now then as a member of this WHO team or in any capacity to look at that data?
DASZAK: No.
GUPTA: That sounds concerning, Peter, if it is as serious and we're trying to be as thorough as possible. Maybe it mounts to nothing but I think the fact that you still haven't seen that database, it's just going to raise a lot of eyebrows as we go forward.
DASZAK: Well, rightly so. I think that, you know, China should be more open about the things that they've not released. But this is where politics comes into and when a country is under attack, and they defend and then scientists are caught in the middle of it. It's really unfortunate.
GUPTA (voice-over): Dr. Shi Zhengli and others at the Wuhan Institute of Virology did not respond to interview requests for this documentary.
"These analysts also note that China’s investigations into the pandemic’s origin might not uncover evidence of a laboratory-associated incident if it involved only a small number of researchers who did not acknowledge or have knowledge of a potential infection. Updated Assessment on COVID-19 Origins"
Is the so-called “respiratory disease” or “white lung disease” of unknown cause that broke out in the United States in the second half of 2019 as new coronary pneumonia? What kind of research is being carried out in Fort Detrick and other biological laboratories in the United States? Is it related to coronavirus? How are the security measures implemented? Is it related to the origin of the global new crown epidemic? These are all questions that should be answered in the tracing of the new crown, but the US government has been covering up. In order to use the epidemic to achieve political goals, the US government suppressed scientists and suppressed professional opinions. In particular, scientists who deny the "laboratory leak theory" are subjected to cyber violence and harassment, not only affecting their normal work, but even facing personal threats.
Beijing won't accept the W.H.O's proposed second phase investigation into the origins of the Covid-19 pandemic, accusing it of “arrogance” and a “disrespect for common sense” with its return to the “lab leak” theory. Zeng Yixin, deputy minister of the National Health Commission, said he was “very surprised” when he first read about the proposed study “because it places the hypothesis that ‘China’s breach of laboratory protocols caused the virus to leak’ as one of the research priorities.” Zeng said none of the staff or postgraduates at the Wuhan Institute of Virology – at the centre of the lab leak claims – had been infected with the new coronavirus and the lab had not conducted any gain-of-function studies. Fauci approved Daszak re-purposing NIH grants to the WIV so these experiments could go foward, assuming his Deputy, Erik Stemmy, apprised him of them. South China Morning Post
GOP ORIGINS REPORT: "Therefore, it is reasonable to conclude, based on the WIV’s extensive sample library and history of genetically manipulating coronaviruses, that in early September, one or more researchers became infected with SARS-CoV-2 in the lab and carried it out into the city. Based on the WIV’s publications, researchers could have been exposed while experimenting with a natural virus collected from the wild or infected with a virus they genetically manipulated. Those researchers likely traveled to and from the WIV via the Wuhan metro or via the shuttle service, providing a vector for the virus to spread. This corresponds with the first signs of a growing wave of ill people in Wuhan centered around the WIV’s Wuchang facility."
FAUCI TRUSTS THE CHINESE COMMUNIST PARTY?
Doctor Anthony Fauci states we can't rely on the three scientists falling ill, intell, until China produces the scientists medical records, as if this were a real possibility. China is a "socialist" slave-state where 43% of the population, earns $150-a-month and a country that routinely launches cyber-attacks against the U.S. The Chinese insist that Covid-19 didn't orginate in Wuhan so there will never be any medical records. CCP spokeswoman Hua Chunying: "I’d like to stress that if the United States truly respects facts, it should open the biological lab at Fort Detrick, Maryland, give more transparency to issues like its 200-plus overseas bio-labs, invite WHO experts to conduct origin-tracing in the United States, and respond to the concerns from the international community with real actions."
JULY 2021: FAUCI WANTS TO REVIVE DASZAK'S PREDICT PROGRAM THAT FAILED TO PREDICT THE PANDEMIC
"The idea is to make “prototype” vaccines to protect against viruses from about 20 families that might spark a new pandemic. Using research tools that proved successful for Covid-19, researchers would uncover the molecular structure of each virus, learn where antibodies must strike it, and how to prod the body into making exactly those antibodies. It would cost “a few billion dollars” a year, take five years for the first crop of results and engage a huge cadre of scientists, he said." There has never been a vaccine produced by GoF / GoT experiments either before and outbreak or after one. It is junk science. No Mention of GoF experiments in new PREDICT plan
DASZAK IS A MOLE WHO INFILTRATED FAUCI, BARIC AND LI'S SCIENTIFIC CIRCLES
Daszak: "We have obtained a letter of support from Dr Ralph Baric, who is keen to collaborate with us initially to infect his humanized mouse model with our bat SL-CoV that uses ACE2, and subsequently to use other CoVs we identify (see Dr Ralph Baric, Letter of Support) Intercept 125. In October 2014 President Obama banned Gain-of-Threat experiments in the USA. Obama feared a global pandemic if one of the nano particle-sized viruses escaped via a leak or in an infected human or animal. Daszak was one step ahead of Obama, with help from the NIH's Fauci, Daszak had already outsourced the experiments to the WIV. Again, Gain-of-Threat experiments, called "Gain-of-Function" experiments, utilize genetic engineering to make a virus hundreds of times more transmittable than the virus nature created. GoF is also used to expand the number of hosts the virus can infect. SARS-CoV-2 was not designed to mutate rapidly making it difficult for vaccines to be developed that would work on every variant.1 But it is in so many human hosts that it does just that: e. g. "About half of adults infected in a June 2021 outbreak of the Delta variant of Covid-19 in Israel were fully inoculated with the Pfizer Inc. vaccine, prompting the government to reimpose an indoor mask requirement and other measures to contain the highly transmissible strain." However the NYT reported: "The vaccines made by Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna set off a persistent immune reaction in the body that may protect against the coronavirus for years, scientists reported. The findings add to growing evidence that most people immunized with the mRNA vaccines may not need boosters, so long as the virus and its variants do not evolve much beyond their current forms — which is not guaranteed." The paradigm for many was that Israel is the most vaccinated country in the world, that vaccinated people rarely become infected, that even more rarely do they become severely ill and that basically, with very few precautions in place, the population was very close to herd immunity. The problemwas that what was true for the original virus “did not necessarily hold true for future variants coupled with waning immunity.”
1. "Variant" is a mutation. That's a word no one likes to use.
Despite Obama's Executive Order, made against the wishes of NIH head Fauci, Dr. Daszak continued to "re-purpose" part of his NIH / NIAID / USAID (CIA lite) grant money to the WIV where no such ban existed, so it could continue the GoT experiments. Why was Daszak gung-ho on seeing gain-of-threat experiments continue? Daszak's cover is liberal-Democrat but he is really a Chinese agent-of-influence. Daszak's organization, Eco-Health Alliance, was first described as a foreign entity. Daszak is a Fascist, a reincarnation of his Fascist father Bohdan Daszak, but this time around, an Eco-Fascist.
CHAPTER 15
CHINESE-AGENT-OF-INFLUENCE PETER DASZAK TWEETS
Not only did Daszak orchestrate the pandemic, but he, along with Dr. Marion Koopmans, orchestrated the coverup. Daszak was the most visible presence in the bogus W.H.O. investigation that blamed the pandemic on imported frozen meat.
Daszak: "What possible infection sources in Huanan market? Could have been introduced by a person, or a product (e.g. frozen farmed wildlife INCLUDING SPECIES SUSCEPTIBLE TO COVID)..Vendors were trading wildlife products..frozen. From farms within the country. On future work amidst [Chinese] political sensitivities: “I stand resolute against the political attacks that we see every day. [In Wuhan] we met scientists who are ready, willing & able to collaborate. I’m looking forward to digging deeper & tracing back the origins of this virus....What we found is evidence of a way the virus could have emerged from rural China into a big city like Wuhan... at the end of the report, both the China team of experts & the WHO experts all felt this was the most likely pathway that the virus took. The WHO team examined lab work of a number of researchers in Wuhan & found "no evidence at all that any of the labs in China were working on this virus prior to the outbreak...Did they have viruses that were potential ancestor of SARS-CoV-2? Again, no evidence of that. Attempts to re-engage with China may not be the worst thing. The Trump administration taught us that the United States’ most effective way of destabilizing China is to destabilize itself. That this is a foolish exercise should be self-evident. We need better options."
This is too unbelievable to have been made up so it must be true and it's extremely terrifying. I think I've read too many David Baldacci and Michael Crichton novels to see this ending well.
![[in the BRUEGEL painting]](https://peterdaszak.com/fallenangels.jpg){kind=link}
This is too unbelievable to have been made up so it must be true and it's extremely terrifying. I think I've read too many David Baldacci and Michael Crichton novels to see this ending well.